• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Receipt of Colonoscopy Following Diagnosis of Advanced Adenomas: An Analysis within Integrated Healthcare Delivery Systems.高级腺瘤诊断后结肠镜检查的接受情况:综合医疗保健提供系统内的分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Jan;28(1):91-98. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0452. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
2
Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.低风险大肠腺瘤患者结肠镜监测间隔较短的相关因素及其对结局的影响
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun;152(8):1933-1943.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
3
Baseline Colonoscopy Findings Associated With 10-Year Outcomes in a Screening Cohort Undergoing Colonoscopy Surveillance.基线结肠镜检查结果与结肠镜筛查监测队列中 10 年结局的相关性。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):862-874.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.052. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Removal of Adenomas During Screening Colonoscopies.筛查结肠镜检查中切除腺瘤后结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):875-883.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.011. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
5
Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population.中国南方人群息肉切除术后结直肠腺瘤的复发和监测。
J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;45(8):838-45. doi: 10.1007/s00535-010-0227-3. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
6
Do surveillance intervals in patients with more than five adenomas at index colonoscopy be shorter than those in patients with three to four adenomas? A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease study.在初次结肠镜检查时发现有超过5个腺瘤的患者中,监测间隔时间是否应短于有3至4个腺瘤的患者?一项韩国肠道疾病研究协会的研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May;32(5):1026-1031. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13643.
7
[Distribution characteristics and risk factors of colorectal adenomas].[结直肠腺瘤的分布特征及危险因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 25;21(6):678-684.
8
Sex-specific prevalence of adenomas, advanced adenomas, and colorectal cancer in individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy.在接受筛查性结肠镜检查的个体中,腺瘤、高级别腺瘤和结直肠癌的性别特异性患病率。
JAMA. 2011 Sep 28;306(12):1352-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1362.
9
Association of Colonoscopy Adenoma Findings With Long-term Colorectal Cancer Incidence.结肠镜检查腺瘤发现与长期结直肠癌发病率的关系。
JAMA. 2018 May 15;319(19):2021-2031. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5809.
10
Colonoscopist Performance and Colorectal Cancer Risk After Adenoma Removal to Stratify Surveillance: Two Nationwide Observational Studies.结肠镜检查医生的表现与腺瘤切除后的结直肠癌风险分层监测:两项全国性观察性研究。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Mar;160(4):1067-1074.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A National Cancer Database Study on the Demographic, Prognostic, and Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Survival in Adenocarcinoma in Villous Adenoma.一项关于影响绒毛状腺瘤腺癌患者生存的人口统计学、预后及社会经济因素的国家癌症数据库研究。
Cureus. 2025 Apr 16;17(4):e82367. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82367. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Adherence to follow-up and resource use after abnormal FIT-screening: Evaluation of the Danish colorectal cancer screening program.粪便免疫化学检测筛查异常后的随访依从性及资源利用情况:丹麦结直肠癌筛查项目评估
Endosc Int Open. 2024 May 3;12(5):E649-E658. doi: 10.1055/a-2297-9622. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for post-polypectomy colorectal cancer in the USA: a prospective cohort study.美国息肉切除术后结直肠癌风险预测模型的开发与验证:一项前瞻性队列研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Aug 10;62:102139. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102139. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Deep Learning Empowers Endoscopic Detection and Polyps Classification: A Multiple-Hospital Study.深度学习助力内镜检测与息肉分类:一项多医院研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 19;13(8):1473. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13081473.
5
Use of surveillance colonoscopy among individuals with removal of high-risk polyps according to the US Multi-Society Task Force recommendations.根据美国多学会工作组的建议,在切除高危息肉的个体中使用监测结肠镜检查。
Cancer. 2023 May 1;129(9):1394-1401. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34692. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
6
The impact of cumulative colorectal cancer screening delays: A simulation study.结直肠癌筛查延误的影响:一项模拟研究。
J Med Screen. 2022 Jun;29(2):92-98. doi: 10.1177/09691413211045103. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
7
Gastroenterology visitation and reminders predict surveillance uptake for patients with adenomas with high-risk features.胃肠病学就诊和提醒可预测具有高危特征的腺瘤患者的监测接受率。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 22;11(1):8764. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88376-4.
8
Clinical care pathway program versus open-access system: a study on appropriateness, quality, and efficiency in the delivery of colonoscopy in the colorectal cancer.临床护理路径方案与开放接入系统:结直肠癌结肠镜检查提供的适宜性、质量和效率研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;16(5):1197-1206. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02565-z. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
9
Black and White Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Outcomes: A Narrative Review.黑白人群在结直肠癌筛查及筛查结局方面的差异:一项叙述性综述。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Jan;30(1):3-12. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1537. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
10
Early Screening of African Americans (45-50 Years Old) in a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.以粪便免疫化学试验为基础的结直肠癌筛查方案中对 45-50 岁非裔美国人的早期筛查。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Nov;159(5):1695-1704.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2576-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3332.
2
Underuse and Overuse of Colonoscopy for Repeat Screening and Surveillance in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局中结肠镜检查在重复筛查和监测方面的使用不足与过度使用情况。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar;14(3):436-444.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
3
Unifying screening processes within the PROSPR consortium: a conceptual model for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.PROSPR联盟内统一筛查流程:乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的概念模型
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 May 7;107(6):djv120. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv120. Print 2015 Jun.
4
Utilization of surveillance after polypectomy in the medicare population--a cohort study.医疗保险人群息肉切除术后监测的应用——一项队列研究
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 13;9(11):e110937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110937. eCollection 2014.
5
Underuse of surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer.在结直肠癌风险增加的患者中,监测结肠镜检查的使用不足。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;110(5):633-41. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.344. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
6
Patient-, provider-, and system-level factors in low adherence to surveillance colonoscopy guidelines: implications for future interventions.结肠镜监测指南依从性低的患者、提供者和系统层面因素:对未来干预措施的启示
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2014 Dec;45(4):500-3. doi: 10.1007/s12029-014-9653-4.
7
The colorectal cancer screening process in community settings: a conceptual model for the population-based research optimizing screening through personalized regimens consortium.社区环境中的结直肠癌筛查流程:基于人群研究的概念模型,通过个性化方案联盟优化筛查
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul;23(7):1147-58. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1217. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
8
Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death.腺瘤检出率与结直肠癌风险和死亡。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.
9
Use of colonoscopy for polyp surveillance in Medicare beneficiaries.在 Medicare 受益人群中使用结肠镜检查进行息肉监测。
Cancer. 2013 May 15;119(10):1800-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27990. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
10
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.筛查和息肉切除术后结肠镜监测指南:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组的共识更新
Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):844-857. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

高级腺瘤诊断后结肠镜检查的接受情况:综合医疗保健提供系统内的分析。

Receipt of Colonoscopy Following Diagnosis of Advanced Adenomas: An Analysis within Integrated Healthcare Delivery Systems.

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Jan;28(1):91-98. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0452. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0452
PMID:30459208
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6324953/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, experts recommend surveillance colonoscopy 3 years after advanced adenoma removal. Little is known about adherence to that interval.

METHODS

We describe patterns of and factors associated with subsequent colonoscopy among persons with ≥3 adenomas and/or ≥1 adenoma with villous/tubulovillous histology in four U.S. integrated healthcare delivery systems. We report Kaplan-Meier estimators of the cumulative percentage of patients undergoing colonoscopy 6 months to 3.5 years after an index colonoscopy with high-risk findings. Combining data from three healthcare systems, we used multivariable logistic regression with inverse probability of censoring weights to estimate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between patient characteristics and receipt of subsequent colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Among 6,909 persons with advanced adenomas, the percent receiving a subsequent colonoscopy 6 months to 3.5 years later ranged from 18.3% (95% CI: 11.7%-27.8%) to 59.5% (95% CI: 53.8%-65.2%) across healthcare systems. Differences remained significant in the multivariable model. Patients with ≥3 adenomas were more likely than those with 1 to 2 villous/tubulovillous adenomas to undergo subsequent colonoscopy. Subsequent colonoscopy was also more common for patients ages 60-74 and less common for patients ages 80 to 89 compared with those ages 50 to 54 years at their index colonoscopy. Sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbidity index score were generally not associated with subsequent colonoscopy receipt.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonoscopy within the recommended interval following advanced adenoma was underutilized and varied by healthcare system, age, and number of adenomas.

IMPACT

Strategies to improve adherence to surveillance colonoscopy following advanced adenomas are needed.

摘要

背景

为降低结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率,专家建议在高级别腺瘤切除后 3 年内进行监测结肠镜检查。目前对于该间隔时间的依从性知之甚少。

方法

我们描述了在美国四个综合医疗服务系统中,具有≥3 个腺瘤和/或≥1 个具有绒毛/管状绒毛状组织学特征的腺瘤的患者在高级别腺瘤切除后进行后续结肠镜检查的模式和相关因素。我们报告了在具有高危特征的索引结肠镜检查后 6 个月至 3.5 年内接受结肠镜检查的患者百分比的累积 Kaplan-Meier 估计值。通过合并来自三个医疗保健系统的数据,我们使用逆概率 censoring 加权的多变量逻辑回归来估计患者特征与接受后续结肠镜检查之间的关联的比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在 6909 名高级别腺瘤患者中,在不同医疗服务系统中,在高级别腺瘤切除后 6 个月至 3.5 年内接受后续结肠镜检查的患者比例范围为 18.3%(95%CI:11.7%-27.8%)至 59.5%(95%CI:53.8%-65.2%)。在多变量模型中差异仍然显著。与 1 至 2 个绒毛/管状绒毛状腺瘤相比,具有≥3 个腺瘤的患者更有可能进行后续结肠镜检查。与在索引结肠镜检查时年龄为 50-54 岁的患者相比,年龄为 60-74 岁的患者以及年龄为 80-89 岁的患者进行后续结肠镜检查的可能性更高。性别、种族/族裔和合并症指数评分通常与接受后续结肠镜检查的可能性无关。

结论

在高级别腺瘤切除后推荐的间隔内进行结肠镜检查的情况并未得到充分利用,并且因医疗服务系统、年龄和腺瘤数量而异。

影响

需要采取策略来提高对高级别腺瘤监测结肠镜检查的依从性。