Wiener Joshua, Hsieh Jane, McIntyre Amanda, Teasell Robert
Lawson Health Research Institute, Parkwood Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
St. Joseph's Health Care, Parkwood Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Fall;24(4):353-362. doi: 10.1310/sci17-00048. Epub 2018 May 3.
Spasticity is a common secondary complication of spinal cord injury (SCI), which can severely impact functional independence and quality of life. 4-Aminopyridine (4-AP) is a potassium channel blocker that has been studied as an intervention for spasticity in individuals with SCI. To conduct a systematic review of the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of 4-AP for the management of spasticity in individuals with SCI. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on five electronic databases for articles published in English up to January 2017. Studies were included if (1) the sample size was three or more subjects, (2) the population was ≥50% SCI, (3) the subjects were ≥18 years old, (4) the treatment was 4-AP via any route, and (5) spasticity was assessed before and after the intervention. Subject characteristics, study design, intervention protocol, assessment methods, side effects, adverse events, and outcomes were extracted from selected studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated for methodological quality using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) tool. Levels of evidence were assigned using a modified Sackett scale. Nine studies met inclusion criteria with a pooled sample size of 591 subjects. Six studies were RCTs (PEDro = 6-10, Level 1 evidence) and three studies were pre-post tests (Level 4 evidence). There was a wide range in duration, severity, and level of SCI across subjects. Oral 4-AP was investigated in five studies; one study reported significant improvements on the Ashworth Scale (AS), while the remaining four studies found no improvement. Three studies found no significant improvements on the Spasm Frequency Scale. Intravenous 4-AP was investigated in three studies; no significant improvements were found on the AS or in the Reflex Score. Intrathecal 4-AP was investigated in one study, which did not find significant improvements on the AS. There is weak evidence supporting the effectiveness of 4-AP in reducing spasticity post SCI. Future research should utilize contemporary measures of spasticity and address methodological limitations such as small sample sizes.
痉挛是脊髓损伤(SCI)常见的继发性并发症,会严重影响功能独立性和生活质量。4-氨基吡啶(4-AP)是一种钾通道阻滞剂,已被作为SCI患者痉挛的一种干预措施进行研究。旨在对4-AP治疗SCI患者痉挛有效性的现有证据进行系统评价。对五个电子数据库进行了全面的文献检索,以查找截至2017年1月发表的英文文章。纳入标准为:(1)样本量为三名或更多受试者;(2)人群中SCI患者比例≥50%;(3)受试者年龄≥18岁;(4)治疗方式为通过任何途径使用4-AP;(5)在干预前后对痉挛进行评估。从入选研究中提取受试者特征、研究设计、干预方案、评估方法、副作用、不良事件和结果。使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)工具对随机对照试验(RCT)的方法学质量进行评估。采用改良的Sackett量表确定证据级别。九项研究符合纳入标准,汇总样本量为591名受试者。六项研究为RCT(PEDro评分为6 - 10,一级证据),三项研究为前后测试(四级证据)。受试者的SCI病程、严重程度和损伤水平差异很大。五项研究对口服4-AP进行了调查;一项研究报告在Ashworth量表(AS)上有显著改善,而其余四项研究未发现改善。三项研究在痉挛频率量表上未发现显著改善。三项研究对静脉注射4-AP进行了调查;在AS或反射评分方面未发现显著改善。一项研究对鞘内注射4-AP进行了调查,未发现AS有显著改善。支持4-AP降低SCI后痉挛有效性的证据薄弱。未来的研究应采用当代痉挛测量方法,并解决样本量小等方法学局限性问题。