• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对《荷包缝合术与带引流管一期缝合术用于造口回纳手术的比较：一项随机临床试验的结果》的勘误

Correction to: Purse-string approximation vs. primary closure with a drain for stoma reversal surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Amano Kunihiko, Ishida Hideyuki, Kumamoto Kensuke, Okada Norimichi, Hatano Satoshi, Chika Noriyasu, Tajima Yusuke, Ohsawa Tomonori, Yokoyama Masaru, Ishibashi Keiichiro, Mochiki Erito

机构信息

Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1981 Kamoda, Kawagoe, Saitama, 350-8550, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Miki-cho, Kagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2019 Mar;49(3):238. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1735-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00595-018-1735-7
PMID:30460403
Abstract

In the original publication, surname of first author is misspelt as "Amamo". It should be "Amano" as given in this Correction.

摘要

在原出版物中，第一作者的姓氏拼写错误为“Amamo”。如本勘误所示，应为“Amano”。

相似文献

1
Correction to: Purse-string approximation vs. primary closure with a drain for stoma reversal surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial.对《荷包缝合术与带引流管一期缝合术用于造口回纳手术的比较：一项随机临床试验的结果》的勘误
Surg Today. 2019 Mar;49(3):238. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1735-7.
2
Purse-string approximation vs. primary closure with a drain for stoma reversal surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial.荷包缝合术与带引流管的一期缝合术用于造口回纳手术的比较：一项随机临床试验的结果
Surg Today. 2019 Mar;49(3):231-237. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1729-5. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
3
[Application of modified purse-string closure in the wound following loop stoma reversal].改良荷包缝合在袢式造口回纳术后伤口的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 25;21(12):1403-1407.
4
The effect of purse-string approximation versus linear approximation of ileostomy reversal wounds on morbidity rates and patient satisfaction: the 'STOMA' trial.荷包缝合与线性缝合回肠造口还纳术对术后并发症发生率和患者满意度的影响：STOMA 试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Nov;21(11):863-868. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1713-x. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
5
Purse-string closure versus conventional primary closure of wound following stoma reversal: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.荷包缝合与常规缝合在肠造口还纳术后的对比：随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:208-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.027. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
Influence of skin closure technique on surgical site infection after loop ileostomy reversal: retrospective cohort study.肠袢式回肠造口还纳术后切口缝合方式对手术部位感染的影响：回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(10):1123-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
7
Quality of life following ostomy reversal with purse-string vs linear skin closure: a systematic review.荷包缝合与直线皮肤缝合回纳造口术后的生活质量：一项系统评价
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Feb;34(2):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3219-z. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
8
Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure techniques in stoma closure: a comprehensive meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised trials.造口关闭术中荷包缝合皮肤与线性缝合皮肤技术的比较：一项随机试验的综合荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;33(10):1319-1332. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3139-y. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
9
Purse-string closure technique reduces the incidence of incisional hernias following the reversal of temporary ileostomy.荷包缝合关闭技术可降低临时回肠造口回纳术后切口疝的发生率。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jul;33(7):973-977. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2986-x. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
10
Purse-string suture vs second intention healing: results of a randomized, blind clinical trial.荷包缝合与二期愈合的比较：一项随机、盲法临床试验的结果。
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Mar;151(3):265-70. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.2313.