• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠袢式回肠造口还纳术后切口缝合方式对手术部位感染的影响:回顾性队列研究。

Influence of skin closure technique on surgical site infection after loop ileostomy reversal: retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2013;11(10):1123-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.09.003
PMID:24035923
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intestinal stoma closure is associated with high risk of surgical site infection (SSI) at stoma reversal site. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the outcome of purse string approximation (PSA) compared to primary linear closure (PLC) of the skin after loop ileostomy reversal.

METHODS

Data of 140 patients operated between 2005 and 2012 were analyzed in this two-center-study to determine the outcome of patients with either PSA (n = 44) or PLC (n = 96) after loop ileostomy reversal.

RESULTS

Patients in the PSA group were significantly older than in the PLC group (64 ± 15 vs. 57 ± 18; p = 0.026). Cardiac diseases were significantly more present in the PSA group in comparison to the PLC group (59% vs. 38%; p = 0.017). Stoma creation was significantly more often due to malignancy in the PSA group in comparison to the PLC group (68% vs. 50%; p = 0.044). SSI occurred significantly more often in the PLC group in comparison to the PSA group (17% vs. 5%; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk for SSI is lower in patients with PSA in comparison to patients with PLC. In order to diminish SSI we recommend performing a PSA in patients with loop ileostomy reversal.

摘要

背景

肠造口关闭与造口反转部位手术部位感染(SSI)的风险较高有关。本回顾性队列研究的目的是确定荷包缝合(PSA)与回肠造口反转后皮肤的线性一期缝合(PLC)的结果。

方法

对 2005 年至 2012 年间进行手术的 140 例患者的数据进行了这项双中心研究,以确定行回肠造口反转后行 PSA(n = 44)或 PLC(n = 96)的患者的结局。

结果

PSA 组患者明显比 PLC 组患者年龄大(64 ± 15 岁 vs. 57 ± 18 岁;p = 0.026)。与 PLC 组相比,PSA 组患者的心脏病明显更多(59% vs. 38%;p = 0.017)。与 PLC 组相比,PSA 组患者造口形成更多是由于恶性肿瘤(68% vs. 50%;p = 0.044)。与 PSA 组相比,PLC 组 SSI 的发生率明显更高(17% vs. 5%;p = 0.047)。

结论

与 PLC 组相比,PSA 组患者 SSI 的风险较低。为了降低 SSI 的风险,我们建议在进行回肠造口反转时行 PSA。

相似文献

1
Influence of skin closure technique on surgical site infection after loop ileostomy reversal: retrospective cohort study.肠袢式回肠造口还纳术后切口缝合方式对手术部位感染的影响:回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(10):1123-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
2
The effect of purse-string approximation versus linear approximation of ileostomy reversal wounds on morbidity rates and patient satisfaction: the 'STOMA' trial.荷包缝合与线性缝合回肠造口还纳术对术后并发症发生率和患者满意度的影响:STOMA 试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Nov;21(11):863-868. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1713-x. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
3
Purse-string approximation is superior to primary skin closure following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.荷包缝合法优于肠造口还纳术后的一期皮肤缝合:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Aug;17(4):345-51. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0970-y. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
4
Prevalence of surgical site infection at the stoma site following four skin closure techniques: a retrospective cohort study.四种皮肤闭合技术后造口部位手术部位感染的患病率:一项回顾性队列研究
Dig Surg. 2014;31(2):73-8. doi: 10.1159/000354426. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
5
Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure in people undergoing stoma reversal.造口回纳术患者荷包式皮肤缝合与直线式皮肤缝合的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 12;3(3):CD014763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014763.pub2.
6
Randomized controlled trial: comparison of two surgical techniques for closing the wound following ileostomy closure: purse string vs direct suture.随机对照试验:比较回肠造口关闭术后两种缝合方法:荷包缝合与直接缝合。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Aug;15(8):1033-40. doi: 10.1111/codi.12211.
7
Comparison of purse-string technique vs linear suture for skin closure after ileostomy reversal. A randomized controlled trial.荷包缝合技术与直线缝合在回肠造口术后皮肤关闭中的比较。一项随机对照试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 27;409(1):141. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03332-w.
8
Risk factors for surgical site infections and trends in skin closure technique after diverting loop ileostomy reversal: A multi-institutional analysis.预防性回肠造口还纳术后手术部位感染的危险因素及皮肤缝合技术的变化趋势:多中心分析。
Am J Surg. 2023 Nov;226(5):703-708. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.07.042. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
9
A prospective study of 'circumferential purse-string approximation' vs. primary linear skin closure in stoma reversal.前瞻性研究“环形荷包缝合”与造口反转中的原发性线性皮肤缝合的比较。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Aug 17;42:287. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.287.29213. eCollection 2022.
10
The use of purse-string skin closure in loop ileostomy reversals leads to lower wound infection rates--a single high-volume centre experience.在回肠造口术回纳术中使用荷包缝合皮肤可降低伤口感染率——来自一个高容量单中心的经验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jun;29(6):709-14. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1822-6. Epub 2014 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of different skin suturing methods on patient prognosis after ileostomy closure.不同皮肤缝合方法对回肠造口关闭术后患者预后的影响。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):106560. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560.
2
Laparoscopic versus open ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes.腹腔镜与开放回肠造口关闭术:术后结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 May 5;40(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04897-8.
3
The effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy for wound healing after stoma reversal: a randomized control study.
负压伤口治疗对造口回纳术后伤口愈合的有效性:一项随机对照研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Sep;105(3):126-132. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.3.126. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
Short-term outcome of diverting loop ileostomy reversals performed by residents: a retrospective cohort prognostic factor study.经住院医师施行的回肠袢式造口还纳术的短期结局:一项回顾性队列预后因素研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Apr 21;38(1):108. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04390-0.
5
A prospective study of 'circumferential purse-string approximation' vs. primary linear skin closure in stoma reversal.前瞻性研究“环形荷包缝合”与造口反转中的原发性线性皮肤缝合的比较。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Aug 17;42:287. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.287.29213. eCollection 2022.
6
Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy for the wound of ileostomy closure: a multicenter, phase II randomized controlled trial.负压伤口疗法在回肠造口关闭伤口中的有效性:一项多中心、二期随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2021 Dec 28;21(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01446-2.
7
Evidence-based adoption of purse-string skin closure for stoma wounds.基于证据的造口伤口荷包缝合皮肤闭合术的应用
Med J Armed Forces India. 2020 Apr;76(2):185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
8
The effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy for wound healing after stoma reversal: a randomised control study (SR-PICO study).负压伤口疗法在造口反转术后伤口愈合中的疗效:一项随机对照研究(SR-PICO 研究)。
Trials. 2020 Jan 6;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3925-z.
9
Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.回肠袢式造口关闭术后肠麻痹的发生率及预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2430-2443. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06794-y. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
10
Purse-string vs. linear skin closure at loop ileostomy reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.荷包缝合与线性皮肤缝合在回肠袢式造口还纳术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Mar;23(3):207-220. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01952-9. Epub 2019 Feb 26.