College of Humanities, University of Exeter.
Br J Sociol. 2019 Sep;70(4):1602-1623. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12620. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
The article examines the limitations of methodological nationalism in the studies of social memory through a case study of memory of Stalinist repression in Belarus. It analyses how various social agencies - national and local activists, religious organisations, and international foundations - use the memory of repression for constructing post-Soviet Belarusian identity by embedding their national representations in larger transnational frameworks. Drawing on the concept of 'internal globalisation', this article develops the idea of 'internal transnationalism' that suggests the importance of wider transnational configurations for the definition of nation. Internalized transnationalism does not make a national memory concept less nation-centred, but it affects the choice of its cultural, political and civilizational framing. In contrast to methodological cosmopolitanism that implies rediscovering of the national as an internalized global, methodological transnationalism emphasizes the multiplicity of co-existing transnational networks that can be invoked by social actors in their national mnemonic agenda. Using the case of the Kurapaty memorial site the article analyses how multiple framings of memory representations - the Belarusian national memory, liberal anti-communist memory, contesting memories, such as Polish, Baltic and Jewish - compete and juxtapose in the space of social memory of political repression.
本文通过对白俄罗斯斯大林时期镇压记忆的案例研究,考察了方法论民族主义在社会记忆研究中的局限性。本文分析了各种社会机构——国家和地方活动家、宗教组织和国际基金会——如何通过将其民族代表性嵌入更大的跨国框架,利用镇压记忆来构建后苏联时期的白俄罗斯身份。本文借鉴“内部全球化”的概念,提出了“内部跨国主义”的观点,认为更广泛的跨国格局对于民族的定义很重要。内化的跨国主义并没有使民族记忆概念变得不那么以民族为中心,而是影响了其文化、政治和文明框架的选择。与方法论世界主义不同,后者意味着重新发现作为内化的全球的民族,方法论跨国主义强调了多种共存的跨国网络的多元性,社会行为体可以在其民族记忆议程中援引这些网络。本文通过库尔帕蒂纪念地的案例分析了在政治镇压的社会记忆空间中,多种记忆表现形式的框架——白俄罗斯民族记忆、自由反共记忆、竞争记忆,如波兰、波罗的海和犹太记忆——是如何相互竞争和并置的。