Muller Felipe, Bermejo Federico, Hirst William
a Department of Psychology , CONICET-Universidad de Belgrano , Buenos Aires , Argentina.
b Department of Psychology , Universidad de Belgrano , Buenos Aires , Argentina.
Memory. 2018 Aug;26(7):974-984. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1431283. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
Studies on collective memory have recently addressed the distinction between cultural and communicative memory as a way to understand how the source of a memory affects its structure or form. When a groups' memory is mediated by memorials, documentaries or any other cultural artifacts, collective memory is shaped by cultural memory. When it is based mostly in communication with other people, its source is communicative memory. We address this distinction by studying two recent events in Argentinean history: the 2001 economic-political-social crisis (communicative memory) and the 1976 coup (cultural memory). We also examine the political ideology and the type of memory involved in collective memory. The memory of the studied events may occur during the lifetime of the rememberer (Lived Memory) or refer to distant events (Distant Memory). 100 participants responded to a Free Recall task about the events of 2001 in Argentina. Narrative analysis allowed comparing these recalls with our 1976 study. Results show: 1) Cultural memories are more contextualised, more impersonal and less affective. 2) Communicative memories are more personal and affective. Study shows how collective memory form changes when it has a different prevalent source.
近期,关于集体记忆的研究探讨了文化记忆与交际记忆之间的区别,以此作为理解记忆来源如何影响其结构或形式的一种方式。当一个群体的记忆通过纪念馆、纪录片或任何其他文化产物来介导时,集体记忆就由文化记忆塑造。当它主要基于与他人的交流时,其来源就是交际记忆。我们通过研究阿根廷历史上的两个近期事件来探讨这种区别:2001年的经济 - 政治 - 社会危机(交际记忆)和1976年的政变(文化记忆)。我们还考察了集体记忆中所涉及的政治意识形态和记忆类型。对所研究事件的记忆可能发生在记忆者的有生之年(鲜活记忆),也可能涉及久远的事件(遥远记忆)。100名参与者对一项关于2001年阿根廷事件的自由回忆任务做出了回应。叙事分析使得我们能够将这些回忆与我们1976年的研究进行比较。结果显示:1)文化记忆更具情境性、更客观且情感色彩更淡。2)交际记忆更具个人色彩且情感更丰富。研究表明,当集体记忆有不同的主要来源时,其形式会发生怎样的变化。