Busch Caleb, Nakadate Ryu, Uemura Munenori, Obata Satoshi, Jimbo Takahiro, Hashizume Makoto
University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Center for Advanced Medical Innovation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019 Oct;12(4):388-395. doi: 10.1111/ases.12672. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
The purpose of this study was to assess robot-assisted suturing skills on a laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis model by using a novel computerized objective assessment system.
This study compared the suturing skills of 13 surgically naïve participants on an artificial intestinal anastomosis model that mimics real tissue. Each examinee sutured using da Vinci robot assistance under 2-D and 3-D visualization and with conventional laparoscopy (CL). Pressure-measuring and image-processing devices were employed to quantitatively evaluate suturing skills. Five unique criteria were used to evaluate the skills of participants.
Suturing under 3-D visualization (P < 0.01) and with CL (P < 0.05) were significantly faster than under 2-D visualization. Sutures placed under 3-D (P < 0.05) and 2-D (P < 0.01) visualization had significantly better suture tension than those placed with CL, which did not meet acceptable values for suture tension. Sutures placed with CL had significantly better air pressure leakage than those placed under 2-D visualization (P < 0.05), which did not meet acceptable values for air pressure leakage and wound opening area. One participants failed to achieve full-thickness sutures with 2-D, two participants with CL, and one participant with 3-D.
Using 3-D vision is necessary for complex maneuvering during robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Our quantitative assessment system is useful for evaluating the skill acquisition of surgeon-trainees undergoing robotic surgery training.
本研究旨在通过使用一种新型计算机化客观评估系统,评估在腹腔镜肠吻合模型上的机器人辅助缝合技能。
本研究比较了13名无手术经验的参与者在模拟真实组织的人工肠吻合模型上的缝合技能。每位受试者在二维和三维可视化以及传统腹腔镜检查(CL)下使用达芬奇机器人辅助进行缝合。采用压力测量和图像处理设备对缝合技能进行定量评估。使用五个独特的标准来评估参与者的技能。
在三维可视化(P < 0.01)和CL(P < 0.05)下的缝合明显比在二维可视化下更快。在三维(P < 0.05)和二维(P < 0.01)可视化下放置的缝线的缝合张力明显优于在CL下放置的缝线,CL下放置的缝线的缝合张力未达到可接受值。在CL下放置的缝线的气压泄漏明显优于在二维可视化下放置的缝线(P < 0.05),二维可视化下放置的缝线的气压泄漏和伤口开口面积未达到可接受值。一名参与者在二维下未能完成全层缝合,两名参与者在CL下未能完成,一名参与者在三维下未能完成。
在机器人辅助微创手术中进行复杂操作时,使用三维视觉是必要的。我们的定量评估系统有助于评估接受机器人手术培训的外科实习生的技能掌握情况。