Uemura Munenori, Yamashita Makoto, Tomikawa Morimasa, Obata Satoshi, Souzaki Ryota, Ieiri Satoshi, Ohuchida Kenoki, Matsuoka Noriyuki, Katayama Tamotsu, Hashizume Makoto
Center for Advanced Medical Innovation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan,
Surg Endosc. 2015 Feb;29(2):444-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3681-9. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
The purpose of this study was to develop a new objective assessment system for the suture ligature method employed in the laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis model. Suturing skills were evaluated objectively using this system.
This study compared 17 expert surgeons, each of whom had performed >500 laparoscopic procedures, with 36 novice surgeons, each of whom had performed <15 laparoscopic procedures. Each examinee performed a specific skill assessment task using an artificial model that mimics living tissue, which is linked with the Suture Simulator Instruction Evaluation Unit. The model used internal air pressure measurements and image processing to evaluate suturing skills. Five criteria were used to evaluate the skills of participants.
The volumes of air pressure leak in the expert and novice groups were 21.13 ± 6.68 and 8.51 ± 8.60 kPa, respectively. The numbers of full-thickness sutures in the expert and novice groups were 2.94 ± 0.24 pairs and 2.47 ± 0.77 pairs, respectively. Suture tensions in the expert and novice groups were 60.99 ± 11.81 and 80.90 ± 16.63 %, respectively. The areas of wound-opening in the expert and novice groups were 1.76 ± 2.17 and 11.06 ± 15.37 mm(2), respectively. The performance times in the expert and novice groups were 349 ± 120 and 750 ± 269 s, respectively. Significant differences between the expert and novice groups for each criterion were observed. The acceptable range of values for each criterion except for the number of full-thickness sutures was statistically defined by the performance of the expert group.
Our system is useful for the quantitative assessment of suturing skill in laparoscopic surgery. We believe that this system is a useful tool for training and assessment of laparoscopic surgeons.
本研究旨在开发一种用于腹腔镜肠道吻合模型中缝合结扎方法的新型客观评估系统。使用该系统对缝合技能进行客观评估。
本研究将17名每位都已进行超过500例腹腔镜手术的专家外科医生与36名每位都已进行少于15例腹腔镜手术的新手外科医生进行比较。每位受试者使用一个模拟活体组织的人工模型执行特定技能评估任务,该模型与缝合模拟器指令评估单元相连。该模型使用内部气压测量和图像处理来评估缝合技能。使用五个标准来评估参与者的技能。
专家组和新手组的气压泄漏量分别为21.13±6.68和8.51±8.60kPa。专家组和新手组的全层缝合对数分别为2.94±0.24对和2.47±0.77对。专家组和新手组的缝合张力分别为60.99±11.81%和80.90±16.63%。专家组和新手组的伤口开口面积分别为1.76±2.17和11.06±15.37mm²。专家组和新手组的操作时间分别为349±120和750±269秒。观察到专家组和新手组在每个标准上存在显著差异。除全层缝合对数外,每个标准的可接受值范围由专家组的表现进行统计学定义。
我们的系统可用于定量评估腹腔镜手术中的缝合技能。我们认为该系统是培训和评估腹腔镜外科医生的有用工具。