1 Department of Adult Health and Nursing Systems, School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
2 Department of Psychology, College of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 May;28(5):636-645. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6904. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
The complex interplay of psychological stress appraisal, biology, chronically stressful environments, and individual coping mechanisms can impact and tax physiological adaptive processes. This can result in increased cardiometabolic risk (CMR), type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Underlying mechanisms are not entirely clear and appear to differ significantly based on age, sex, race, and ethnicity. This crosssectional descriptive study explored stress profiles of psychological and behavioral adjustment to determine the extent to which patterns of stressors, coping, and CMR differentiated these profiles. African American (AA) women ( = 110; M age = 38.61 years, SD = 6.94 years) were recruited from low-income communities and participated in two home visits to complete stress and coping and cardiovascular risk measures. Three distinct stress and coping adjustment profiles were associated with differences in CMR. The "holding steady" profile had less insulin resistance (IR) and substance use compared to "high substance users" and "high internalizers" profiles. Women who were "holding steady" used less avoidant coping than "high internalizers." Less favorable adjustment processes were associated with IR, as well as significantly higher levels of avoidant coping and substance use. In AA women, awareness of and attention to stress and coping patterns may help attenuate CMR.
心理压力评估、生物学、长期压力环境和个体应对机制的复杂相互作用会影响和加重生理适应过程。这可能导致心血管代谢风险(CMR)增加、2 型糖尿病和心血管疾病。潜在机制尚不完全清楚,并且似乎因年龄、性别、种族和民族而有很大差异。本横断面描述性研究探讨了心理和行为适应的压力特征,以确定压力源、应对方式和 CMR 的模式在多大程度上区分了这些特征。研究招募了来自低收入社区的 110 名非裔美国(AA)女性(M 年龄=38.61 岁,SD=6.94 岁),并让她们在两次家访中完成压力和应对以及心血管风险的测量。三种不同的压力和应对调整特征与 CMR 的差异有关。与“高物质使用者”和“高内部化者”相比,“保持稳定”的压力应对特征具有较少的胰岛素抵抗(IR)和物质使用。与“高内部化者”相比,“保持稳定”的女性使用较少的回避应对。不太有利的调整过程与 IR 以及明显更高水平的回避应对和物质使用有关。在 AA 女性中,对压力和应对模式的认识和关注可能有助于减轻 CMR。