• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结构性指导计划用于髋臼周围截骨术,使低容量骨盆外科医生的并发症较少。

Structured-mentorship Program for Periacetabular Osteotomy Resulted in Few Complications for a Low-volume Pelvic Surgeon.

机构信息

D. T. S. Chou, L. B. Solomon, K. Costi, O. T. Holubowycz, D. W. Howie, Discipline of Orthopedics & Trauma, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia D. T. S. Chou, L. B. Solomon, K. Costi, S. Pannach, D. W. Howie, Department of Orthopedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1126-1134. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000571.

DOI:10.1097/CORR.0000000000000571
PMID:30461514
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6494294/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a complex surgical procedure with a substantial learning curve. Although larger hospital and surgeon procedure volumes have recently been associated with a lower risk of complications, in geographically isolated regions, some complex operations such as PAO will inevitably be performed in low volume. A continuous structured program of distant mentoring may offer benefits when low numbers of PAOs are undertaken, but this has not been tested. We sought to examine a structured, distant-mentorship program of a low-volume surgeon in a geographically remote setting.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to identify the clinical results of PAO performed in a remote-mentorship program, as determined by patient-reported outcome measures and complications of the surgery; (2) to determine radiographic results, specifically postoperative angular corrections, hip congruity, and progression of osteoarthritis; and (3) to determine worst-case analysis of PAO survivorship, defined as nonconversion to THA, in a regionally isolated cohort of patients with a high rate of followup.

METHODS

Between August 1992 and August 2016, 85 PAOs were undertaken in 72 patients under a structured, distant-mentorship program. The patients were followed for a median of 5 years (range, 2-25 years). There were 18 males (21 hips) and 54 females (64 hips). The median age of the patients at the time of surgery was 26 years (range, 14-45 years). One patient was lost to followup (two PAOs) and one patient died as a result of an unrelated event. Patient-reported outcome measures and complications were collected through completion of patient and doctor questionnaires and clinical examination. Radiographic assessment of angular correction, joint congruity, and osteoarthritis was undertaken using standard radiology software. PAO survivorship was defined as nonconversion to THA and is presented using worst-case analysis. The loss-to-followup quotient-number of patients lost to followup divided by the number of a patients converted to THA-was calculated to determine quality of followup and reliability of survivorship data.

RESULTS

The median preoperative Harris hip scores of 58 (range, 20-96) improved postoperatively to 78 (range, 33-100), 86 (range, 44-100), 87 (range, 55-97), and 80 (range, 41-97) at 1, 5, 10, and 14 years, respectively. Sink Grade III complications at 12 months included four relating to the PAO and one relating to the concomitant femoral procedure. The median lateral center-edge angle correction achieved was 22° (range, 3°-50°) and the median correction of acetabular index was 19° (range, 3°-37°). Osteoarthritis progressed from a preoperative mean Tönnis grade of 0.6 (median, 1; range, 0-2) to a postoperative mean of 0.9 (median, 1; range, 0-3). Six hips underwent conversion to THA: five for progression of osteoarthritis and one for impingement. At 12-year followup, survivorship of PAO was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85%-98%) and survivorship with worst-case analysis was 90% (95% CI, 79%-96%). The loss-to-followup quotient for this study was low, calculated to be 0.3.

CONCLUSIONS

When PAO is performed using a structured process of mentoring under the guidance of an expert, one low-volume surgeon in a geographically isolated region achieved good patient-reported outcomes, a low incidence of complications at 12 months, satisfactory radiographic outcomes, and high survivorship. A structured distant-mentorship program may be a suitable method for initially learning and continuing to perform low-volume complex surgery in a geographically isolated region.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

摘要

背景

伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)是一种具有复杂学习曲线的手术。尽管较大的医院和外科医生手术量与较低的并发症风险相关,但在地理上孤立的地区,一些复杂的手术,如 PAO,将不可避免地在低手术量下进行。当进行的 PAO 数量较少时,持续的远程指导结构化计划可能会带来好处,但这尚未得到检验。我们试图在地理偏远的地区,检查低手术量外科医生的结构化、远程指导计划。

问题/目的:本研究的目的是:(1)通过患者报告的结果测量和手术并发症,确定在远程指导计划下进行的 PAO 的临床结果;(2)确定影像学结果,特别是术后角度矫正、髋关节一致性和骨关节炎进展;(3)确定在一个高随访率的区域性孤立患者队列中,PAO 存活率的最坏情况分析,定义为未转换为 THA。

方法

1992 年 8 月至 2016 年 8 月期间,72 名患者接受了 85 次结构化、远程指导计划下的 PAO。患者平均随访 5 年(范围,2-25 年)。18 名男性(21 髋)和 54 名女性(64 髋)。手术时患者的中位年龄为 26 岁(范围,14-45 岁)。一名患者失访(两例 PAO),一名患者因无关事件死亡。通过完成患者和医生问卷以及临床检查收集患者报告的结果测量和并发症。使用标准放射学软件评估角度矫正、关节一致性和骨关节炎的影像学评估。PAO 存活率定义为未转换为 THA,并使用最坏情况分析进行表示。失访率-失访患者数除以转换为 THA 的患者数-用于确定随访质量和存活率数据的可靠性。

结果

58 例(范围,20-96)的术前 Harris 髋关节评分中位数改善至术后的 78 分(范围,33-100)、86 分(范围,44-100)、87 分(范围,55-97)和 80 分(范围,41-97),分别在 1、5、10 和 14 年时。12 个月时出现 Sink 分级 III 级并发症,其中 4 例与 PAO 有关,1 例与同期股骨手术有关。中位外侧中心边缘角度矫正达到 22°(范围,3°-50°),髋臼指数中位矫正为 19°(范围,3°-37°)。骨关节炎从术前平均 Tönnis 分级 0.6(中位数,1;范围,0-2)进展到术后平均 0.9(中位数,1;范围,0-3)。6 髋进行了 THA 转换:5 髋为骨关节炎进展,1 髋为撞击。在 12 年随访时,PAO 的存活率为 94%(95%置信区间,85%-98%),最差情况分析的存活率为 90%(95%置信区间,79%-96%)。本研究的失访率较低,计算值为 0.3。

结论

当 PAO 由一名低手术量的外科医生在地理孤立地区使用指导专家的结构化过程进行指导时,获得了良好的患者报告结果,12 个月时并发症发生率低,影像学结果满意,存活率高。结构化的远程指导计划可能是在地理孤立地区最初学习和继续进行低手术量复杂手术的合适方法。

证据水平

四级,治疗研究。

相似文献

1
Structured-mentorship Program for Periacetabular Osteotomy Resulted in Few Complications for a Low-volume Pelvic Surgeon.结构性指导计划用于髋臼周围截骨术,使低容量骨盆外科医生的并发症较少。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1126-1134. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000571.
2
What Is the Early/Mid-term Survivorship and Functional Outcome After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy in a Pediatric Surgeon Practice?在小儿外科医生的实践中,伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术后的早期/中期生存率和功能结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 May;474(5):1216-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4386-7.
3
One-third of Hips After Periacetabular Osteotomy Survive 30 Years With Good Clinical Results, No Progression of Arthritis, or Conversion to THA.髋臼周围截骨术后三分之一的髋关节在30年时仍保持良好临床效果,无关节炎进展或无需转换为全髋关节置换术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1154-1168. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5169-5.
4
Periacetabular Osteotomy Provides Higher Survivorship Than Rim Trimming for Acetabular Retroversion.髋臼周围截骨术治疗髋臼后倾的生存率高于髋臼缘修整术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1138-1150. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5177-5. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
5
What Are the Early Outcomes of True Reverse Periacetabular Osteotomy for Symptomatic Hip Overcoverage?真反向髋臼周围截骨术治疗症状性髋过度覆盖的早期结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 May 1;479(5):1081-1093. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001549.
6
Do Radiographic Parameters of Dysplasia Improve to Normal Ranges After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术后发育不良的影像学参数会改善至正常范围吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1120-1127. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5077-8.
7
Rotational Acetabular Osteotomy for Pre- and Early Osteoarthritis Secondary to Dysplasia Provides Durable Results at 20 Years.用于发育异常继发的早期和前期骨关节炎的髋臼旋转截骨术在20年时疗效持久。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2145-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4854-8.
8
Periacetabular Osteotomy Improves Pain and Function in Patients With Lateral Center-edge Angle Between 18° and 25°, but Are These Hips Really Borderline Dysplastic?髋臼周围截骨术可改善外侧中心边缘角在 18° 和 25° 之间的患者的疼痛和功能,但这些髋关节真的属于边缘性发育不良吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1145-1153. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000516.
9
Does Surgeon Experience Impact the Risk of Complications After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?外科医生的经验是否会影响伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术后的并发症风险?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1110-1117. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5010-1.
10
Survivorship of the Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy: What Factors are Associated with Long-term Failure?伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术的生存率:哪些因素与长期失败相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):396-405. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4887-z. Epub 2016 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional and radiological outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia in patients under fifty years using a minimally invasive approach-a single surgeon series with a minimum follow up of two years.采用微创入路治疗五十岁以下髋臼发育不良患者的髋臼周围截骨术的功能和放射学结果:单外科医生系列研究,随访时间至少两年。
Int Orthop. 2024 May;48(5):1225-1231. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06094-8. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
How does telementoring impact medical education within the surgical field? A scoping review.远程指导如何影响外科领域的医学教育?一项范围综述。
Am J Surg. 2022 Sep;224(3):869-880. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.04.038. Epub 2022 May 6.
3
Does hip preservation surgery prevent arthroplasty? Quantifying the rate of conversion to arthroplasty following hip preservation surgery.保髋手术能预防关节置换吗?量化保髋手术后转换为关节置换的发生率。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Jun 28;7(2):168-182. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnaa022. eCollection 2020 Jul.
4
What the papers say.报纸上都说了些什么。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Jul 20;6(2):177-180. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnz033. eCollection 2019 Jul.
5
CORR Insights®: Structured-mentorship Program for Periacetabular Osteotomy Resulted in Few Complications for a Low-volume Pelvic Surgeon.CORR见解®:髋臼周围截骨术的结构化指导计划对低手术量骨盆外科医生而言并发症较少。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1135-1137. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000599.

本文引用的文献

1
Intermediate-Term Hip Survivorship and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Periacetabular Osteotomy: The Washington University Experience.髋关节周围截骨术的中期髋关节生存率和患者报告的结果:华盛顿大学的经验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Feb 7;100(3):218-225. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00337.
2
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Periacetabular Osteotomy from the Prospective ANCHOR Cohort Study.前瞻性ANCHOR队列研究中髋臼周围截骨术的患者报告结局
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jan 4;99(1):33-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00798.
3
Improving survival and local control in rectal cancer in Catalonia (Spain) in the context of centralisation: A full cycle audit assessment.在集中化背景下提高西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区直肠癌的生存率和局部控制率:一项全周期审计评估
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;42(12):1873-1880. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
4
Does Surgeon Experience Impact the Risk of Complications After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?外科医生的经验是否会影响伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术后的并发症风险?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1110-1117. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5010-1.
5
Survivorship of the Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy: What Factors are Associated with Long-term Failure?伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术的生存率:哪些因素与长期失败相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):396-405. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4887-z. Epub 2016 May 12.
6
What Is the Early/Mid-term Survivorship and Functional Outcome After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy in a Pediatric Surgeon Practice?在小儿外科医生的实践中,伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术后的早期/中期生存率和功能结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 May;474(5):1216-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4386-7.
7
The incidence of stress fracture following peri-acetabular osteotomy: an under-reported complication.髋臼周围截骨术后应力性骨折的发生率:一种报告不足的并发症。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Jan;97-B(1):24-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.34525.
8
Complications associated with the periacetabular osteotomy: a prospective multicenter study.髋臼周围截骨术相关并发症:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 3;96(23):1967-74. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00113.
9
Dilemmas in imaging for peri-acetabular osteotomy: the influence of patient position and imaging technique on the radiological features of hip dysplasia.髋臼周围截骨术影像学中的困境:患者体位和影像学技术对髋关节发育不良的影像学特征的影响。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Sep;96-B(9):1155-60. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B9.34269.
10
Clinical and radiological outcome after periacetabular osteotomy: a cross-sectional study of 127 hips operated on from 1999-2008.髋臼周围截骨术后的临床及影像学结果:一项对1999年至2008年期间接受手术的127例髋关节的横断面研究。
Hip Int. 2014 Jul-Aug;24(4):369-80. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000129. Epub 2014 Apr 8.