Institute of Neuroscience, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.
Brain. 2018 Dec 1;141(12):3290-3307. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy281.
Non-invasive functional brain imaging is used more than ever to investigate pain in health and disease, with the prospect of finding new means to alleviate pain and improve patient wellbeing. The observation that several brain areas are activated by transient painful stimuli, and that the magnitude of this activity is often graded with pain intensity, has prompted researchers to extract features of brain activity that could serve as biomarkers to measure pain objectively. However, most of the brain responses observed when pain is present can also be observed when pain is absent. For example, similar brain responses can be elicited by salient but non-painful auditory, tactile and visual stimuli, and such responses can even be recorded in patients with congenital analgesia. Thus, as argued in this review, there is still disagreement on the degree to which current measures of brain activity exactly relate to pain. Furthermore, whether more recent analysis techniques can be used to identify distributed patterns of brain activity specific for pain can be only warranted using carefully designed control conditions. On a more general level, the clinical utility of current pain biomarkers derived from human functional neuroimaging appears to be overstated, and evidence for their efficacy in real-life clinical conditions is scarce. Rather than searching for biomarkers of pain perception, several researchers are developing biomarkers to achieve mechanism-based stratification of pain conditions, predict response to medication and offer personalized treatments. Initial results with promising clinical perspectives need to be further tested for replicability and generalizability.
非侵入性功能脑成像被越来越多地用于研究健康和疾病中的疼痛,以期找到减轻疼痛和改善患者福祉的新方法。人们观察到,几个大脑区域会被短暂的疼痛刺激激活,而且这种活动的程度通常与疼痛强度成比例,这促使研究人员提取大脑活动的特征作为生物标志物来客观地测量疼痛。然而,当疼痛存在时观察到的大多数大脑反应也可以在疼痛不存在时观察到。例如,相似的大脑反应可以由显著但非疼痛的听觉、触觉和视觉刺激引起,即使在先天性镇痛的患者中也可以记录到这种反应。因此,正如本文所讨论的,对于当前的大脑活动测量与疼痛的确切关系程度,仍然存在分歧。此外,是否可以使用最近的分析技术来识别特定于疼痛的大脑活动的分布式模式,只有在使用精心设计的对照条件下才能得到保证。在更一般的层面上,目前从人类功能神经影像学中得出的疼痛生物标志物的临床实用性似乎被夸大了,并且缺乏其在现实临床条件下有效性的证据。与其寻找疼痛感知的生物标志物,一些研究人员正在开发生物标志物来实现基于机制的疼痛状况分层,预测对药物的反应,并提供个性化治疗。具有有前景的临床观点的初步结果需要进一步测试其可重复性和普遍性。