Suppr超能文献

静脉导管相关不良事件在外周静脉抗菌药物治疗的门诊患者中超过药物相关不良事件。

Intravenous catheter-related adverse events exceed drug-related adverse events in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

机构信息

The Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Division of Infection, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Mar 1;74(3):787-790. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky474.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug-related adverse events (AEs) are reported to be common amongst patients receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). However, comparative data regarding intravenous (iv) catheter-related AEs are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To compare drug- and iv catheter-related AEs from a large UK OPAT centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 544 OPAT episodes [median (IQR) age: 57 (39-71) years, 60% male, 13% with diabetes] with a median (IQR) duration of 7 (2-18) days. Clinically significant drug- and iv catheter-related AEs were calculated as a percentage of OPAT episodes with an AE and also as AEs per 1000 iv drug/catheter days.

RESULTS

Drug-related AEs complicated 13 (2.4%) OPAT episodes at 1.7 (95% CI 0.9-2.9) per 1000 drug days. Catheter-related AEs occurred more frequently, complicating 32 (5.9%) episodes at 5.7 (95% CI 4.2-7.9) per 1000 iv catheter days (χ2 test for difference in AE rate: P < 0.001). Non-radiologically guided midline catheters were associated with the most frequent AEs (n = 23) at 15.6 (95% CI 10.3-23.4) per 1000 iv catheter days compared with other types of iv catheters (HR 8.4, 95% CI 2.4-51.9, P < 0.004), and self-administration was associated with a higher rate of catheter-related AEs at 12.0 (95% CI 6.0-23.9) per 1000 iv catheter days (HR 4.15, 95% CI 1.7-9.1, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically significant iv catheter-related AEs occurred more frequently than drug-related AEs, especially when using non-radiologically guided midline catheters. Regular review of the need for iv therapy and switching to oral antimicrobials when appropriate is likely to minimize OPAT-related AEs.

摘要

背景

在接受门诊静脉注射抗生素治疗(OPAT)的患者中,药物相关不良反应(AE)报告较为常见。然而,关于静脉(iv)导管相关 AE 的比较数据尚缺乏。

目的

比较英国一家大型 OPAT 中心的药物和 iv 导管相关 AE。

患者和方法

我们回顾了 544 例 OPAT 治疗[中位数(IQR)年龄:57(39-71)岁,60%为男性,13%合并糖尿病],治疗持续时间中位数(IQR)为 7(2-18)天。以 AE 发生的 OPAT 治疗例数的百分比和每 1000 iv 药物/导管天的 AE 数来计算临床显著的药物和 iv 导管相关 AE。

结果

13 例(2.4%)OPAT 治疗发生药物相关 AE,药物相关 AE 发生率为每 1000 药物天 1.7(95% CI 0.9-2.9)。导管相关 AE 更为常见,32 例(5.9%)OPAT 治疗发生导管相关 AE,发生率为每 1000 iv 导管天 5.7(95% CI 4.2-7.9)(差异的 χ2 检验:P<0.001)。非放射引导中线导管与最频繁的 AE(n=23)相关,每 1000 iv 导管天发生率为 15.6(95% CI 10.3-23.4),与其他类型的 iv 导管相比(HR 8.4,95% CI 2.4-51.9,P<0.004),自我管理与更高的导管相关 AE 发生率相关,每 1000 iv 导管天为 12.0(95% CI 6.0-23.9)(HR 4.15,95% CI 1.7-9.1,P=0.007)。

结论

与药物相关 AE 相比,临床显著的 iv 导管相关 AE 更为常见,尤其是使用非放射引导中线导管时。定期评估 iv 治疗的必要性,并在适当情况下转为口服抗生素,可能会最大限度地减少 OPAT 相关 AE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fa/6376853/f637a4e47cf2/dky474f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验