• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉导管相关不良事件在外周静脉抗菌药物治疗的门诊患者中超过药物相关不良事件。

Intravenous catheter-related adverse events exceed drug-related adverse events in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

机构信息

The Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Division of Infection, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Mar 1;74(3):787-790. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky474.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dky474
PMID:30462237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6376853/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug-related adverse events (AEs) are reported to be common amongst patients receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). However, comparative data regarding intravenous (iv) catheter-related AEs are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To compare drug- and iv catheter-related AEs from a large UK OPAT centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 544 OPAT episodes [median (IQR) age: 57 (39-71) years, 60% male, 13% with diabetes] with a median (IQR) duration of 7 (2-18) days. Clinically significant drug- and iv catheter-related AEs were calculated as a percentage of OPAT episodes with an AE and also as AEs per 1000 iv drug/catheter days.

RESULTS

Drug-related AEs complicated 13 (2.4%) OPAT episodes at 1.7 (95% CI 0.9-2.9) per 1000 drug days. Catheter-related AEs occurred more frequently, complicating 32 (5.9%) episodes at 5.7 (95% CI 4.2-7.9) per 1000 iv catheter days (χ2 test for difference in AE rate: P < 0.001). Non-radiologically guided midline catheters were associated with the most frequent AEs (n = 23) at 15.6 (95% CI 10.3-23.4) per 1000 iv catheter days compared with other types of iv catheters (HR 8.4, 95% CI 2.4-51.9, P < 0.004), and self-administration was associated with a higher rate of catheter-related AEs at 12.0 (95% CI 6.0-23.9) per 1000 iv catheter days (HR 4.15, 95% CI 1.7-9.1, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically significant iv catheter-related AEs occurred more frequently than drug-related AEs, especially when using non-radiologically guided midline catheters. Regular review of the need for iv therapy and switching to oral antimicrobials when appropriate is likely to minimize OPAT-related AEs.

摘要

背景

在接受门诊静脉注射抗生素治疗(OPAT)的患者中,药物相关不良反应(AE)报告较为常见。然而,关于静脉(iv)导管相关 AE 的比较数据尚缺乏。

目的

比较英国一家大型 OPAT 中心的药物和 iv 导管相关 AE。

患者和方法

我们回顾了 544 例 OPAT 治疗[中位数(IQR)年龄:57(39-71)岁,60%为男性,13%合并糖尿病],治疗持续时间中位数(IQR)为 7(2-18)天。以 AE 发生的 OPAT 治疗例数的百分比和每 1000 iv 药物/导管天的 AE 数来计算临床显著的药物和 iv 导管相关 AE。

结果

13 例(2.4%)OPAT 治疗发生药物相关 AE,药物相关 AE 发生率为每 1000 药物天 1.7(95% CI 0.9-2.9)。导管相关 AE 更为常见,32 例(5.9%)OPAT 治疗发生导管相关 AE,发生率为每 1000 iv 导管天 5.7(95% CI 4.2-7.9)(差异的 χ2 检验:P<0.001)。非放射引导中线导管与最频繁的 AE(n=23)相关,每 1000 iv 导管天发生率为 15.6(95% CI 10.3-23.4),与其他类型的 iv 导管相比(HR 8.4,95% CI 2.4-51.9,P<0.004),自我管理与更高的导管相关 AE 发生率相关,每 1000 iv 导管天为 12.0(95% CI 6.0-23.9)(HR 4.15,95% CI 1.7-9.1,P=0.007)。

结论

与药物相关 AE 相比,临床显著的 iv 导管相关 AE 更为常见,尤其是使用非放射引导中线导管时。定期评估 iv 治疗的必要性,并在适当情况下转为口服抗生素,可能会最大限度地减少 OPAT 相关 AE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fa/6376853/f637a4e47cf2/dky474f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fa/6376853/f637a4e47cf2/dky474f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fa/6376853/f637a4e47cf2/dky474f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Intravenous catheter-related adverse events exceed drug-related adverse events in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.静脉导管相关不良事件在外周静脉抗菌药物治疗的门诊患者中超过药物相关不良事件。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Mar 1;74(3):787-790. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky474.
2
Factors associated with successful completion of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): A 10-year review from a large West London service.与门诊静脉用抗生素治疗(OPAT)成功完成相关的因素:来自伦敦西部一个大服务机构的 10 年回顾。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Aug;54(2):207-214. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
3
The success rate and complications of midline catheters in pediatric outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT).儿科门诊静脉用抗生素治疗(OPAT)中中线导管的成功率和并发症。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Apr;183(4):1703-1709. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05432-7. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
4
Antimicrobial Agents and Catheter Complications in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗中的抗菌药物与导管并发症
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Apr;38(4):476-481. doi: 10.1002/phar.2099. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
5
The Safety of Midline Catheters for Intravenous Therapy at a Large Academic Medical Center.大型学术医疗中心中线导管用于静脉治疗的安全性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Mar;54(3):232-238. doi: 10.1177/1060028019878794. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
Risk factors for catheter related thrombosis during outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.门诊肠外抗菌治疗期间导管相关性血栓形成的危险因素。
J Vasc Access. 2022 Sep;23(5):738-742. doi: 10.1177/11297298211009361. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
7
Self-Administered Outpatient Antimicrobial Infusion by Uninsured Patients Discharged from a Safety-Net Hospital: A Propensity-Score-Balanced Retrospective Cohort Study.安全网医院出院的未参保患者自我管理门诊抗菌药物输注:一项倾向评分平衡的回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2015 Dec 15;12(12):e1001922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001922. eCollection 2015 Dec.
8
OPAT in Switzerland: single-center experience of a model to treat complicated infections.瑞士的 OPAT:治疗复杂感染的模型的单中心经验。
Infection. 2020 Apr;48(2):231-240. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01381-8. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
9
Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy for infective endocarditis: a review of 4 years' experience at a UK centre.英国某中心 4 年经验回顾:感染性心内膜炎的门诊患者肠外抗生素治疗。
Postgrad Med J. 2012 Jul;88(1041):377-81. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130355. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
10
Efficacy and safety of a Belgian tertiary care outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program.比利时三级保健门诊患者抗菌治疗(OPAT)项目的疗效和安全性。
Infection. 2020 Jun;48(3):357-366. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01398-4. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Delivery of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) in an Ever-Changing National Health Service (UK): Benefits, Barriers, and Opportunities.在不断变化的英国国民医疗服务体系中提供门诊肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT):益处、障碍与机遇
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;14(5):451. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14050451.
2
Evaluation of the stability of tigecycline in elastomeric infusion devices used for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.评价替加环素在用于门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗的弹性输液装置中的稳定性。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 May 13;7(3):dlaf074. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf074. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of self-administered outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment (S-OPAT): a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Antimicrobial Agents and Catheter Complications in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗中的抗菌药物与导管并发症
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Apr;38(4):476-481. doi: 10.1002/phar.2099. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
2
Rates of and Risk Factors for Adverse Drug Events in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.门诊肠外抗菌治疗药物不良事件的发生率和危险因素。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(1):11-19. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix733.
3
Effectiveness and safety of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
自我给药门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗(S-OPAT)的临床和患者报告结局:一项范围综述
Infection. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02549-1.
4
Current practices and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a narrative review.门诊患者的肠外抗菌治疗的现状和挑战:叙事性综述。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Sep 3;79(9):2083-2102. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae177.
5
[Outpatient parenteral anti-infective therapy (OPAT)].门诊胃肠外抗感染治疗(OPAT)
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Jun;65(6):566-575. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01707-1. Epub 2024 May 14.
6
The First Use of a Midline Catheter in Outpatient Pain Management.中线导管在门诊疼痛管理中的首次应用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;12(8):856. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12080856.
7
Does comorbidity index predict OPAT readmission?合并症指数能否预测门诊抗菌药物治疗(OPAT)再入院?
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Nov 23;5(6):dlad125. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad125. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Oritavancin vs Standard of Care for Treatment of Nonendovascular Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections.奥利万星与标准治疗方案治疗非血管内革兰氏阳性血流感染的对比
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 31;10(11):ofad411. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad411. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
The sound of blood: photoacoustic imaging in blood analysis.血液之声:血液分析中的光声成像
Med Nov Technol Devices. 2023 Jun;18. doi: 10.1016/j.medntd.2023.100219. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
10
Current Status of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Korea: Experience of a Single University-Affiliated Acute-Care Hospital.韩国门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗的现状:一所大学附属医院急症医院的经验
Infect Chemother. 2023 Jun;55(2):185-193. doi: 10.3947/ic.2022.0092. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的有效性和安全性
Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;71(12). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13022. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
4
Cost-effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: a simulation modelling approach.门诊胃肠外抗生素治疗的成本效益:一种模拟建模方法。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Aug 1;72(8):2392-2400. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx123.
5
Clinical and cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of ommunity ntraenous ntibiotic ervice models: CIVAS systematic review.社区静脉抗生素服务模式的临床及成本效益、安全性与可接受性:CIVAS系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 20;7(4):e013560. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013560.
6
Time Efficiency Assessment of Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategies.抗菌药物管理策略的时间效率评估
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 May 15;64(10):1463-1464. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix220.
7
Safety and utilization of peripherally inserted central catheters versus midline catheters at a large academic medical center.大型学术医疗中心外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管与中线导管的安全性及使用情况
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Dec 1;44(12):1458-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.09.010.
8
Safety and efficacy of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in an academic infectious disease clinic.学术性传染病诊所门诊胃肠外抗生素治疗的安全性和有效性
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Feb;42(1):39-43. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12465. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
9
Predictors of Hospital Readmission in Patients Receiving Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.接受门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗患者再次入院的预测因素
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Aug;36(8):934-9. doi: 10.1002/phar.1799. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
10
Attitudes and Behaviours to Antimicrobial Prescribing following Introduction of a Smartphone App.引入智能手机应用程序后对抗菌药物处方的态度和行为
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 25;11(4):e0154202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154202. eCollection 2016.