Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Ecology, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Ecol Lett. 2019 Jan;22(1):170-180. doi: 10.1111/ele.13182. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
While forest management strongly influences biodiversity, it remains unclear how the structural and compositional changes caused by management affect different community dimensions (e.g. richness, specialisation, abundance or completeness) and how this differs between taxa. We assessed the effects of nine forest features (representing stand structure, heterogeneity and tree composition) on thirteen above- and belowground trophic groups of plants, animals, fungi and bacteria in 150 temperate forest plots differing in their management type. Canopy cover decreased light resources, which increased community specialisation but reduced overall diversity and abundance. Features increasing resource types and diversifying microhabitats (admixing of oaks and conifers) were important and mostly affected richness. Belowground groups responded differently to those aboveground and had weaker responses to most forest features. Our results show that we need to consider forest features rather than broad management types and highlight the importance of considering several groups and community dimensions to better inform conservation.
虽然森林管理强烈影响生物多样性,但仍不清楚管理引起的结构和组成变化如何影响不同的群落维度(例如丰富度、专化性、丰度或完整性),以及不同分类群之间的差异。我们评估了九个森林特征(代表林分结构、异质性和树种组成)对 150 个温带森林样地中 13 个地上和地下营养层的植物、动物、真菌和细菌的影响,这些样地的管理类型不同。冠层覆盖减少了光资源,这增加了群落的专化性,但降低了整体多样性和丰度。增加资源类型和使微生境多样化的特征(橡树和针叶树的混合)很重要,并且主要影响丰富度。地下类群对地上类群的反应不同,对大多数森林特征的反应较弱。我们的结果表明,我们需要考虑森林特征而不是广泛的管理类型,并强调考虑多个类群和群落维度的重要性,以便更好地为保护提供信息。