Cemagref, UR EFNO, Domaine des Barres, F-45290 Nogent-sur-Vernisson, France.
Conserv Biol. 2010 Feb;24(1):101-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x.
Past and present pressures on forest resources have led to a drastic decrease in the surface area of unmanaged forests in Europe. Changes in forest structure, composition, and dynamics inevitably lead to changes in the biodiversity of forest-dwelling species. The possible biodiversity gains and losses due to forest management (i.e., anthropogenic pressures related to direct forest resource use), however, have never been assessed at a pan-European scale. We used meta-analysis to review 49 published papers containing 120 individual comparisons of species richness between unmanaged and managed forests throughout Europe. We explored the response of different taxonomic groups and the variability of their response with respect to time since abandonment and intensity of forest management. Species richness was slightly higher in unmanaged than in managed forests. Species dependent on forest cover continuity, deadwood, and large trees (bryophytes, lichens, fungi, saproxylic beetles) and carabids were negatively affected by forest management. In contrast, vascular plant species were favored. The response for birds was heterogeneous and probably depended more on factors such as landscape patterns. The global difference in species richness between unmanaged and managed forests increased with time since abandonment and indicated a gradual recovery of biodiversity. Clearcut forests in which the composition of tree species changed had the strongest effect on species richness, but the effects of different types of management on taxa could not be assessed in a robust way because of low numbers of replications in the management-intensity classes. Our results show that some taxa are more affected by forestry than others, but there is a need for research into poorly studied species groups in Europe and in particular locations. Our meta-analysis supports the need for a coordinated European research network to study and monitor the biodiversity of different taxa in managed and unmanaged forests.
过去和现在对森林资源的压力导致欧洲未管理森林的表面积急剧减少。森林结构、组成和动态的变化不可避免地导致森林栖息物种的生物多样性发生变化。然而,森林管理(即与直接森林资源利用有关的人为压力)可能导致的生物多样性增益和损失从未在全欧洲范围内进行过评估。我们使用荟萃分析回顾了 49 篇已发表的论文,这些论文包含了欧洲各地未管理和管理森林物种丰富度的 120 个独立比较。我们探讨了不同分类群的反应及其对废弃时间和森林管理强度的反应的可变性。未管理森林的物种丰富度略高于管理森林。依赖于森林覆盖连续性、枯木和大树(苔藓、地衣、真菌、腐木甲虫)和步甲科的物种受到森林管理的负面影响。相比之下,维管束植物物种受到青睐。鸟类的反应是异质的,可能更多地取决于景观模式等因素。未管理和管理森林之间物种丰富度的全球差异随着废弃时间的增加而增加,表明生物多样性逐渐恢复。树种组成发生变化的皆伐森林对物种丰富度的影响最大,但由于管理强度类别的复制数量较少,无法以稳健的方式评估不同类型的管理对分类群的影响。我们的研究结果表明,一些分类群比其他分类群更容易受到林业的影响,但需要对欧洲和特定地点研究较少的物种群进行研究。我们的荟萃分析支持建立一个协调的欧洲研究网络的需要,以研究和监测管理和未管理森林中不同分类群的生物多样性。