Guillory Ashley N, Clayton Robert P, Prasai Anesh, Jay Jayson W, Wetzel Michael, El Ayadi Amina, Herndon David N, Finnerty Celeste C
Shriners Hospitals for Children(®)-Galveston, Galveston, Texas; Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
It has been previously shown that anesthesia and analgesia can affect outcomes in the rat burn model and that buprenorphine alleviated pain without drastically altering the outcomes of interest. Recently, the use of a sustained release (SR) formulation of buprenorphine has been promoted over conventional buprenorphine. In this study, we assessed whether buprenorphine-SR altered hemodynamic parameters in our rat model of severe burn injury.
Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to receive either conventional buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg) or buprenorphine-SR (1 mg/kg). Buprenorphine-SR was administered 24 h before the experiment. Buprenorphine was administered on the day of experiment. These groups were further randomized to control or scald burn (60% of total body surface area). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) and heart rate (HR) were measured using a noninvasive blood pressure system before receiving analgesia and after 72 h.
As expected, HR was significantly higher after burn injury regardless of analgesic (P <0.0001). Both SBP and DBP were significantly decreased in burned animals receiving conventional buprenorphine (P < 0.0001), but neither was altered in the buprenorphine-SR-treated burned animals. However, SBP, DBP, and HR were significantly increased after 72 h in control animals receiving buprenorphine-SR (P < 0.0001).
These data indicate that buprenorphine-SR alters the hemodynamic response to injury and may not be an appropriate choice for a model of severe burn injury. If this analgesic is used, investigators must cautiously form conclusions, especially in experimental conditions that would be expected to alter cardiac hemodynamics.
先前的研究表明,麻醉和镇痛会影响大鼠烧伤模型的结果,且丁丙诺啡可减轻疼痛而不会显著改变相关结果。最近,丁丙诺啡缓释(SR)制剂的使用比传统丁丙诺啡更受推崇。在本研究中,我们评估了丁丙诺啡-SR是否会改变我们的严重烧伤大鼠模型的血流动力学参数。
成年雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠被随机分为两组,分别接受传统丁丙诺啡(0.05mg/kg)或丁丙诺啡-SR(1mg/kg)。丁丙诺啡-SR在实验前24小时给药。丁丙诺啡在实验当天给药。这些组进一步随机分为对照组或烫伤组(占全身表面积的60%)。在接受镇痛前和72小时后,使用无创血压系统测量收缩压和舒张压(SBP、DBP)以及心率(HR)。
正如预期的那样,无论使用何种镇痛剂,烧伤后心率均显著升高(P<0.0001)。接受传统丁丙诺啡的烧伤动物的SBP和DBP均显著降低(P<0.0001),但接受丁丙诺啡-SR治疗的烧伤动物两者均未改变。然而,接受丁丙诺啡-SR的对照动物在72小时后SBP、DBP和HR均显著升高(P<0.0001)。
这些数据表明,丁丙诺啡-SR会改变对损伤的血流动力学反应,可能不是严重烧伤损伤模型的合适选择。如果使用这种镇痛药,研究人员必须谨慎得出结论,尤其是在预期会改变心脏血流动力学的实验条件下。