• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心血管植入式设备囊袋感染治疗实践管理指南实施后的结果

Outcomes After the Implementation of Practice Management Guidelines for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Implantable Device Pocket Infections.

作者信息

Buckarma EeeLN, Rivera Mariela, Schiller Henry, Loomis Erica

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:643-646. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.065. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.065
PMID:30463786
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment of cardiovascular implantable device pocket infections (CIDPIs) requires a multimodal approach that includes antimicrobials, device explantation, and local wound care. Our institution implemented a practice management guideline (PMG) to standardize the care of CIDPIs and engage our acute care surgeons in 2013. Our PMG includes wound culture, complete capsulectomy, pulse lavage, and the placement of a negative pressure wound therapy appliance at the time of device extraction. Forty-eight hours later, wounds are irrigated and closed in a delayed primary fashion over drains. Our objective was to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent device extraction before and after the implementation of the PMG for the treatment of CIDPIs.

METHODS

An IRB-approved retrospective review of 155 patients at our institution from 2012 to 2015 who underwent device explantation. Evaluated outcomes measured included days from device explant to wound closure, and postoperative complications. Outcomes data were analyzed before (pre-PMG) and after (post-PMG) enactment of the PMG.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (42 males; mean age 68 years) were managed prior to PMG implementation; 97 (72 males; mean age 67) were managed after. Mean days from device explantation to wound closure were compared (pre-PMG 6 ± 3.5 and post-PMG 2.8 ± 1.8), and time to closure was reduced by 3-d post-PMG implementation (P < 0.05). No increase in surgical site infection, hematoma, or unplanned return to operating room was demonstrated between groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a PMG for the management of CIDPIs is effective in reducing the number of days to pocket wound closure; acute care surgeons are well equipped to participate in this practice and improve patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

心血管植入式设备囊袋感染(CIDPIs)的治疗需要采取多模式方法,包括使用抗菌药物、取出设备以及局部伤口护理。我们机构于2013年实施了一项实践管理指南(PMG),以规范CIDPIs的护理,并让我们的急性 care 外科医生参与其中。我们的PMG包括伤口培养、完整的囊袋切除术、脉冲冲洗以及在取出设备时放置负压伤口治疗装置。48小时后,伤口进行冲洗,并通过延迟一期缝合的方式在引流管上进行闭合。我们的目的是比较在实施PMG前后接受设备取出治疗CIDPIs的患者的结局。

方法

对2012年至2015年在我们机构接受设备取出的155例患者进行了一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究。评估的结局指标包括从设备取出到伤口闭合的天数以及术后并发症。在PMG颁布之前(PMG前)和之后(PMG后)对结局数据进行分析。

结果

在实施PMG之前管理了58例患者(42例男性;平均年龄68岁);之后管理了97例(72例男性;平均年龄67岁)。比较了从设备取出到伤口闭合的平均天数(PMG前6±3.5天和PMG后2.8±1.8天),实施PMG后闭合时间缩短了3天(P<0.05)。两组之间未显示手术部位感染、血肿或计划外返回手术室的情况增加(P<0.05)。

结论

实施用于管理CIDPIs的PMG可有效减少囊袋伤口闭合的天数;急性 care 外科医生具备充分能力参与此项实践并改善患者结局。

相似文献

1
Outcomes After the Implementation of Practice Management Guidelines for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Implantable Device Pocket Infections.心血管植入式设备囊袋感染治疗实践管理指南实施后的结果
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:643-646. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.065. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
2
Pocket infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices treated by negative pressure wound therapy.经负压伤口疗法治疗的心脏植入式电子设备的口袋感染。
Europace. 2014 Mar;16(3):372-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut305. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
3
Same-day contralateral implantation of a permanent device after lead extraction for isolated pocket infection.同期行永久性心脏起搏器同侧植入术治疗孤立性囊袋感染导致的导线拔除术后感染。
Europace. 2014 Feb;16(2):252-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut220. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
4
Management and outcome of permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infections.永久性起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器感染的管理与预后
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 8;49(18):1851-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.072. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
5
Reimplantation and Repeat Infection After Cardiac-Implantable Electronic Device Infections: Experience From the MEDIC (Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Cohort) Database.心脏植入式电子设备感染后的再植入与重复感染:来自MEDIC(多中心电生理设备感染队列)数据库的经验
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Mar;10(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004822.
6
Risk factors for explantation due to infection after sacral neuromodulation: a multicenter retrospective case-control study.骶神经调节后因感染而导致的器械取出的风险因素:一项多中心回顾性病例对照研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):78.e1-78.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
7
Low lateral thoracic site for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: A viable alternative in patients with limited access options after infected device extraction.低位侧胸部位用于心脏植入式电子设备植入:在感染性设备取出后,对于可选择入路有限的患者,这是一种可行的替代方法。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):1506-1514. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
8
Cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead extraction: evidence, techniques, results, and future directions.心血管植入式电子设备导线拔除:证据、技术、结果及未来方向。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2016 Jan;31(1):23-8. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000247.
9
Device-related infection among patients with pacemakers and implantable defibrillators: incidence, risk factors, and consequences.起搏器和植入式除颤器患者的器械相关感染:发生率、危险因素和后果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Jul;21(7):786-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01690.x. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
10
Cardiac implantable electronic device infections: presentation, management, and patient outcomes.心脏植入式电子设备感染:表现、处理和患者预后。
Heart Rhythm. 2010 Aug;7(8):1043-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.016. Epub 2010 May 12.