Suppr超能文献

随机交叉研究早产儿接受鼻高流量时的自动氧控

Randomised cross-over study of automated oxygen control for preterm infants receiving nasal high flow.

机构信息

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chertsey, Surrey, UK.

School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Jul;104(4):F366-F371. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315342. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a prototype automated controller (IntellO) of the inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO) in maintaining a target range of oxygen saturation (SpO) in preterm babies receiving nasal high flow (HF) via the Vapotherm Precision Flow.

DESIGN

Prospective two-centre order-randomised cross-over study.

SETTING

Neonatal intensive care units.

PATIENTS

Preterm infants receiving HF with FiO ≥25%.

INTERVENTION

Automated versus manual control of FiO to maintain a target SpO range of 90%-95% (or 90%-100% if FiO=21%).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was per cent of time spent within target SpO range. Secondary outcomes included the overall proportion and durations of SpO within specified hyperoxic and hypoxic ranges and the number of in-range episodes per hour.

RESULTS

Data were analysed from 30 preterm infants with median (IQR) gestation at birth of 26 (24-27) weeks, study age of 29 (18-53) days and study weight 1080 (959-1443) g. The target SpO range was achieved 80% of the time on automated (IntellO) control (IQR 70%-87%) compared with 49% under manual control (IQR 40%-57%; p<0.0001). There were fewer episodes of SpO below 80% lasting at least 60 s under automated control (0 (IQR 0-1.25)) compared with manual control (5 (IQR 2.75-14)). There were no differences in the number of episodes per hour of SpO above 98% (4.5 (IQR 1.8-8.5) vs 5.5 (IQR 1.9-14); p=0.572) between the study arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The IntellO automated oxygen controller maintained patients in the target SpO range significantly better than manual adjustments in preterm babies receiving HF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02074774.

摘要

目的

评估一种原型自动化控制器(IntellO)在通过 Vapotherm Precision Flow 为接受经鼻高流量(HF)的早产儿输送时,对维持预设氧饱和度(SpO)范围的影响,该预设范围的吸入氧分数(FiO)为 25%。

设计

前瞻性、双中心、随机交叉研究。

设置

新生儿重症监护病房。

患者

接受 FiO≥25%的 HF 的早产儿。

干预

自动控制与手动控制 FiO 以维持目标 SpO 范围 90%-95%(如果 FiO=21%,则为 90%-100%)。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标为达到目标 SpO 范围内的时间百分比。次要观察指标包括特定高氧和低氧范围内 SpO 的总比例和持续时间,以及每小时范围内的事件次数。

结果

共纳入 30 例胎龄中位数(IQR)为 26(24-27)周、研究日龄中位数(IQR)为 29(18-53)天、研究体重中位数(IQR)为 1080(959-1443)g 的早产儿。与手动控制相比(80%[IQR 40%-57%]),自动控制(IntellO)的目标 SpO 范围达成率为 80%(IQR 70%-87%;p<0.0001)。自动控制下 SpO 持续至少 60s 且低于 80%的事件(0[IQR 0-1.25])少于手动控制下(5[IQR 2.75-14])。研究组间每小时 SpO 高于 98%的事件数无差异(4.5[IQR 1.8-8.5] vs 5.5[IQR 1.9-14];p=0.572)。

结论

与手动调整相比,IntellO 自动化氧气控制器在接受 HF 的早产儿中能更好地维持目标 SpO 范围。

试验注册号

NCT02074774。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验