Suppr超能文献

英国短期的欧盟公投与精神健康:使用抗抑郁药处方的自然实验

The EU referendum and mental health in the short term: a natural experiment using antidepressant prescriptions in England.

机构信息

King's College London, London, UK.

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Feb;73(2):168-175. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210637. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has highlighted the impact of economic conditions and uncertainty on physical and mental health. The unexpected result of the Brexit referendum in 2016 triggered high levels of economic uncertainty.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether prescriptions for antidepressants increased after the referendum result, benchmarking them against other drug classes.

METHODS

We used GP practice prescribing data to compile the number of defined daily doses per capita every month in each of the 326 voting areas in England over the period 2011-2016. We used a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to identify the effects of Brexit on antidepressant prescriptions, compared with trends in a control group (antigout and iron preparations) that were unlikely to be associated with uncertainty and depression.

RESULTS

Antidepressant prescribing continued to increase after the referendum but at a slower pace. Therapeutic classes used as controls showed a decrease. The DID approach shows that there was a relative increase of 13.4% in antidepressants compared with other therapeutic classes (DID coeff: 0.134; 95% CI 0.093 to 0.174).

CONCLUSION

Our results are open to different interpretations and should be treated with caution. This relative increase in antidepressant prescribing after the referendum may be attributed to increased uncertainty for certain parts of the population, but does not rule out an improvement in mood for others. Alternatively, some other factor-for example, distraction, might have contributed to a decrease in the control therapeutic classes. A possible policy implication is that programmes for the promotion of mental health may need to be intensified during periods of uncertainty.

摘要

背景

先前的研究强调了经济状况和不确定性对身心健康的影响。2016 年英国脱欧公投的意外结果引发了高度的经济不确定性。

目的

检验公投结果后抗抑郁药的处方是否增加,并与其他药物类别进行对照。

方法

我们使用全科医生实践处方数据,在 2011 年至 2016 年期间,编制了英格兰 326 个投票区中每月每人口的规定日剂量数。我们使用差异中的差异(DID)方法来确定英国脱欧对抗抑郁药处方的影响,与不太可能与不确定性和抑郁相关的对照组(抗痛风和铁制剂)的趋势进行比较。

结果

抗抑郁药的处方在公投后继续增加,但速度较慢。用作对照的治疗类别显示出下降。DID 方法显示,与其他治疗类别相比,抗抑郁药的相对增加了 13.4%(DID 系数:0.134;95%CI 0.093 至 0.174)。

结论

我们的结果有多种解释,应谨慎对待。公投后抗抑郁药处方的相对增加可能归因于部分人群的不确定性增加,但不能排除其他人情绪改善的可能性。或者,其他一些因素——例如分散注意力——可能导致对照治疗类别的减少。一个可能的政策含义是,在不确定时期,可能需要加强促进心理健康的计划。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验