van de Heyning P H, van Haesendonck J, Creten W, Rombaut N
Dept. of ENT, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Allergy. 1988 Jul;43(5):386-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1988.tb00433.x.
Forty-four patients, with symptoms of nasal obstruction, sneezing, itching and/or rhinorrhea, were entered into a placebo-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a topical antihistamine drug, levocabastine, applied 4 times a day for 14 days. At the end of the treatment the placebo patients were treated with levocabastine and the levocabastine patients were treated with beclomethasone dipropionate in a single-blind design for another 14 days. This study showed that levocabastine is significantly more active than placebo with reference to nasal discharge and sneezing. Placebo application improved the symptom score. Levocabastine could not be proved to be more effective against nasal obstruction than placebo in the double-blind trial. In the single-blind set-up, levocabastine resulted in an additional improvement in the score for obstruction, after the placebo period. Although the allergic group tended to respond better, no statistically significant difference could be detected between allergic and non-allergic patients. After treatment with levocabastine, beclomethasone dipropionate administration could not improve the results for nasal discharge and sneezing. For nasal congestion, beclomethasone dipropionate proved to be superior to levocabastine.
44名有鼻塞、打喷嚏、瘙痒和/或流鼻涕症状的患者参与了一项安慰剂对照的双盲研究,以评估一种局部用抗组胺药左卡巴斯汀的临床疗效,该药每天使用4次,持续14天。治疗结束时,安慰剂组患者改用左卡巴斯汀治疗,左卡巴斯汀组患者改用二丙酸倍氯米松进行单盲治疗,持续14天。该研究表明,在减少鼻涕和打喷嚏方面,左卡巴斯汀比安慰剂的活性显著更高。使用安慰剂也使症状评分有所改善。在双盲试验中,无法证明左卡巴斯汀在缓解鼻塞方面比安慰剂更有效。在单盲试验中,经过安慰剂治疗阶段后,左卡巴斯汀使鼻塞评分进一步改善。尽管过敏组的反应往往更好,但在过敏患者和非过敏患者之间未检测到统计学上的显著差异。使用左卡巴斯汀治疗后,改用二丙酸倍氯米松治疗并不能改善鼻涕和打喷嚏的症状。对于鼻塞,二丙酸倍氯米松被证明优于左卡巴斯汀。