• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Beyond bare bones: critical, theoretically engaged qualitative research in public health.超越基础:公共卫生领域批判性、理论性的定性研究
Can J Public Health. 2018 Dec;109(5-6):613-621. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0154-2. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
2
Commentary on the new sex and gender editorial policy of the Canadian Journal of Public Health.《加拿大公共卫生杂志》新的性别与性取向编辑政策述评
Can J Public Health. 2016 Aug 15;107(2):e140-e141. doi: 10.17269/cjph.107.5584.
3
Canadian Journal of Public Health commits to qualitative research : La Revue canadienne de santé publique s'engage envers la recherche qualitative.《加拿大公共卫生杂志》致力于定性研究:《加拿大公共卫生评论》致力于定性研究。
Can J Public Health. 2018 Dec;109(5-6):611-612. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0155-1.
4
Public health emergency preparedness: a framework to promote resilience.突发公共卫生事件应急准备:促进恢复力的框架。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):1344. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6250-7.
5
Are we ready to accept the challenge? Addressing the shortcomings of contemporary qualitative health research.我们是否准备好迎接挑战?应对当代定性健康研究的不足。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Mar-Apr;13(2):332-338. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
6
No research about "them" without "them": CJPH policy with regard to publication of health research on First Nations, Inuit, Métis and Indigenous Peoples.没有“他们”的参与就没有关于“他们”的研究:《加拿大公共卫生杂志》关于发表第一民族、因纽特人、梅蒂斯人和原住民健康研究的政策。
Can J Public Health. 2020 Dec;111(6):818-821. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00449-5.
7
Showcasing the contribution of social sciences to health policy and systems research.展示社会科学对卫生政策和体系研究的贡献。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 24;17(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0862-5.
8
The Promise of Qualitative Research to Inform Theory to Address Health Equity.定性研究对构建理论以解决健康公平问题的启示。
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Oct;44(5):815-819. doi: 10.1177/1090198117728548.
9
Innovations in Policy and Practice: Engaging practitioners as scholars.政策与实践中的创新:让从业者成为学者。
Can J Public Health. 2015 Oct 5;106(6):e343-52. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.5280.
10
Connecting qualitative research on exercise and environment to public health agendas requires an equity lens.将关于运动与环境的定性研究与公共卫生议程联系起来需要公平视角。
Health Place. 2018 Sep;53:264-267. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes of German General Practitioners Toward eHealth Apps for Dementia Risk Reduction: Qualitative Interview Study.德国全科医生对用于降低痴呆风险的电子健康应用程序的态度:定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 22;9:e56310. doi: 10.2196/56310.
2
It's time to make room for the next: a look back at the last ten years of the Canadian Journal of Public Health : Il est temps de laisser la place au suivant/à la suivante : regard sur les dix dernières années de la Revue canadienne de santé publique.是时候为下一个腾出空间了:回顾《加拿大公共卫生杂志》的过去十年:Il est temps de laisser la place au suivant/à la suivante : regard sur les dix dernières années de la Revue canadienne de santé publique.
Can J Public Health. 2023 Dec;114(6):885-888. doi: 10.17269/s41997-023-00827-9.
3
"When I think about my future, I just see darkness": How youth exiting homelessness navigate the hazy, liminal space between socioeconomic exclusion and inclusion.“当我思考未来时,我只看到黑暗”:无家可归的年轻人如何在社会经济排斥和包容之间的模糊、过渡空间中前行。
Can J Public Health. 2023 Dec;114(6):893-905. doi: 10.17269/s41997-023-00804-2. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
4
Introducing SAMMSA, a Five-Step Method for Producing 'Quality' Qualitative Analysis.引入 SAMMSA,一种产生“优质”定性分析的五步方法。
Qual Health Res. 2023 Mar;33(4):334-344. doi: 10.1177/10497323231154482. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
5
Public health community engagement with Asian populations in British Columbia during COVID-19: towards a culture-centered approach.在 COVID-19 期间不列颠哥伦比亚省公共卫生界与亚洲人群的互动:迈向以文化为中心的方法。
Can J Public Health. 2022 Dec;113(Suppl 1):14-23. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00699-5. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
6
A socio-ecological approach to reduce the physical activity drop-out ratio in primary care-based patients with type 2 diabetes: the SENWI study protocol for a randomized control trial.采用社会生态学方法降低基于初级保健的 2 型糖尿病患者身体活动脱落率的研究:一项随机对照试验的 SENWI 研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Oct 3;23(1):842. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06742-7.
7
Advancing Health Equity, Eliminating Health Disparities, and Improving Population Health.推进健康公平、消除健康差异并改善人群健康。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Aug 12;18:E79. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.210264.
8
Characterizing street-connected children and youths' social and health inequities in Kenya: a qualitative study.描述肯尼亚街头流浪儿童和青少年的社会和健康不平等现象:一项定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Aug 28;19(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01255-8.
9
The benefits of a historical-dialectical ontology to critical mental health promotion research.历史辩证本体论对批判性心理健康促进研究的益处。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Mar 12;36(1):262-273. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa024.
10
Qualitative Research for One Health: From Methodological Principles to Impactful Applications.“同一健康”的定性研究:从方法原则到有效应用
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Feb 18;7:70. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00070. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research.致《英国医学杂志》编辑的一封关于定性研究的公开信。
BMJ. 2016 Feb 10;352:i563. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i563.
2
[The qualitative research on social inequalities in health: the life courses].
Can J Public Health. 2013 Feb 11;104(2):e154-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03405680.
3
Walkable for whom? Examining the role of the built environment on the neighbourhood-based physical activity of children.步行对谁而言更便利?探究建成环境对儿童邻里间体力活动的作用。
Can J Public Health. 2012 Jul 26;103(9 Suppl 3):eS29-34. doi: 10.1007/BF03403832.
4
Suicide in rural Haiti: clinical and community perceptions of prevalence, etiology, and prevention.海地农村的自杀问题:流行率、病因和预防的临床和社区认知。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Apr;83:61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.032. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
5
Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences.重新审视定性健康研究的评估:对健康科学领域评估指南综述的思考
J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 May;9(2):187-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00392.x.
6
Human science research in public health: the contribution and assessment of a qualitative approach.
Can J Public Health. 2000 Nov-Dec;91(6):I-4-12.
7
Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?定性方法:它们是什么以及为何要使用它们?
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1101-18.
8
The emergence of qualitative methods in health services research.卫生服务研究中定性方法的出现。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1083-90.
9
Interactions between smokers and non-smokers in public places: a qualitative study.公共场所吸烟者与非吸烟者之间的互动:一项定性研究。
Can J Public Health. 1999 Sep-Oct;90(5):330-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03404522.
10
Why we need qualitative research.我们为何需要定性研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Oct;48(5):425-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.5.425-a.

超越基础:公共卫生领域批判性、理论性的定性研究

Beyond bare bones: critical, theoretically engaged qualitative research in public health.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, York University, Toronto, Canada.

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2018 Dec;109(5-6):613-621. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0154-2. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

DOI:10.17269/s41997-018-0154-2
PMID:30465286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6964430/
Abstract

While qualitative inquiry has been a part of the Canadian Journal of Public Health (CJPH) for many years, CJPH does not yet have the reputation as a home for qualitative research that has a critical focus and that is cqqqonversant with contemporary developments in social theory and qualitative methodology. This paper describes efforts to establish CJPH as a welcoming home for critical, theoretically engaged qualitative research in public health. The paper introduces the Special Section that heralds the forward vision for qualitative research at CJPH. We specify what we mean by critical, theoretically engaged qualitative research and make the case for its significance for public health research and practice. We describe changes made in how qualitative manuscript submissions are handled at CJPH and highlight the contribution to public health scholarship made by the articles that comprise the Special Section. We issue an invitation to the public health community to support and participate in our vision to enhance critical, theoretically informed qualitative research in public health.

摘要

虽然定性研究多年来一直是《加拿大公共卫生杂志》(CJPH)的一部分,但 CJPH 尚未因其具有批判性焦点且熟悉社会理论和定性方法学当代发展的定性研究而享有盛誉。本文描述了为将 CJPH 确立为欢迎批判性、理论性参与的公共卫生定性研究的家园所做的努力。本文介绍了预示着 CJPH 定性研究前瞻性愿景的特刊。我们具体说明了我们所说的批判性、理论性参与的定性研究的含义,并为其对公共卫生研究和实践的重要性提出了理由。我们描述了在 CJPH 处理定性稿件提交方面所做的更改,并强调了特刊中包含的文章对公共卫生学术的贡献。我们向公共卫生界发出邀请,支持并参与我们的愿景,以加强公共卫生中的批判性、理论性的定性研究。