Qiang Wei-Lin, Li Yu-Xuan, Liu Gang, Zhang Li-Hong, Zhang Jing-Yang, Cao Wen-Jin
Dept. of Prosthodontics, Yinchuan Stomatology Hospital, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750001, China.
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 1;36(5):493-497. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2018.05.006.
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effect of pulp-less molars with defects of different degrees repaired by cast ceramic onlays of three marginal types.
A total of 165 endodontically treated molars of 105 patients were included in this study and were divided into three kinds of defect (mild, moderate, severe) according to the number of remaining axial walls. Each defect was divided into three groups according to the shape of edge to edge, bevel edge, and concave shoulder. After tooth preparation, the casting of ceramic onlays was performed. Treatment follow-up was done for the evaluation of the success and survival rates of three groups under the same defect.
The average follow-up was 925.44 days. Under the mild defect, the success and survival rates of the edge to edge onlays were respectively 100% and 100%; bevel edge onlays, 100% and 100%; and concave shoulder onlays, 94.4% and 100%. Under the moderate defect, the success and survival rates of the edge to edge onlays were respectively 96.0% and 100%; bevel edge onlays, 80.0% and 93.3%; and concave shoulder onlays, 95.2% and 95.2%. Under the severe defect, the success and survival rates of the edge to edge onlays were respectively 95.2% and 100%; bevel edge onlays, 73.7% and 89.5%; and concave shoulder onlays, 73.3% and 80.0%. Under different defects, the success or survival rates of the three kinds of onlays had no significant difference (P>0.05).
The edge to edge type is the most preferable way of onlay tooth preparation and can achieve good clinical results in the mild, middle, and severe tooth defection with root canal treatment.
本研究旨在评估三种边缘类型的铸造陶瓷高嵌体修复不同程度缺损的无髓磨牙的临床效果。
本研究纳入105例患者的165颗经根管治疗的磨牙,根据剩余轴壁数量分为三种缺损类型(轻度、中度、重度)。每种缺损根据边缘形状分为边缘对接、斜面边缘和凹肩三组。牙体预备后,进行陶瓷高嵌体铸造。进行治疗随访,以评估相同缺损下三组的成功率和存留率。
平均随访925.44天。在轻度缺损下,边缘对接高嵌体的成功率和存留率分别为100%和100%;斜面边缘高嵌体,100%和100%;凹肩高嵌体,94.4%和100%。在中度缺损下,边缘对接高嵌体的成功率和存留率分别为96.0%和100%;斜面边缘高嵌体,80.0%和93.3%;凹肩高嵌体,95.2%和95.2%。在重度缺损下,边缘对接高嵌体的成功率和存留率分别为95.2%和100%;斜面边缘高嵌体,73.7%和89.5%;凹肩高嵌体,73.3%和80.0%。在不同缺损情况下,三种高嵌体的成功率或存留率无显著差异(P>0.05)。
边缘对接型是高嵌体牙体预备的最佳方式,在根管治疗后的轻度、中度和重度牙齿缺损中均可取得良好的临床效果。