Huang Rui-Rui, Xie Ri-Hua, Wen Shi Wu, Chen Shao-Lin, She Qin, Liu Yan-Nan, Harrison Denise
1 Xiang Ya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China.
2 School of Nursing, Hunan University of Medicine, Huaihua, China.
Can J Nurs Res. 2019 Jun;51(2):116-127. doi: 10.1177/0844562118803756. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
High-quality synthesized evidence of sweet taste analgesia in neonates exists. However, Chinese databases have never been included in previous systematic reviews of sweet solutions for procedural pain.
To conduct a systematic review of Chinese literature evaluating analgesic effects of sweet solutions for neonates. Data sources: Wang Fang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Data extraction and analysis: Two authors screened studies for inclusion and conducted risk of bias ratings and data extraction. A third author resolved any conflicts. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.2 software, on mean differences in pain outcomes using random effects models.
Thirty-one trials (4999 neonates) were included; 26 trials used glucose, 4 used sucrose, and 1 trial evaluated both solutions. Sweet solutions reduced standardized mean pain scores (n = 21 studies; -1.68, 95% confidence interval -2.08, -1.27) and cry duration (n = 6 studies; -25.60, 95% confidence interval -36.47, -14.72 s) but not heart rate change (n = 7 studies; -17.64, 95% confidence interval -52.71, 17.43). No included studies cited the previously published systematic reviews of sweet solutions.
This systematic review of Chinese databases showed the same results as previously published systematic reviews. No trials included in this review cited the English systematic reviews, highlighting a parallel research agenda.
关于新生儿甜味镇痛的高质量综合证据是存在的。然而,中国的数据库从未被纳入以往关于用于程序性疼痛的甜味溶液的系统评价中。
对评估甜味溶液对新生儿镇痛效果的中文文献进行系统评价。数据来源:万方、中国知网和中国生物医学文献数据库。数据提取与分析:两位作者筛选纳入研究,并进行偏倚风险评级和数据提取。第三位作者解决任何分歧。使用RevMan 5.2软件进行Meta分析,采用随机效应模型分析疼痛结局的平均差异。
纳入31项试验(4999名新生儿);26项试验使用葡萄糖,4项试验使用蔗糖,1项试验评估了两种溶液。甜味溶液降低了标准化平均疼痛评分(n = 21项研究;-1.68,95%置信区间-2.08,-1.27)和啼哭持续时间(n = 6项研究;-25.60,95%置信区间-36.47,-14.72秒),但未降低心率变化(n = 7项研究;-17.64,95%置信区间-52.71,17.43)。纳入的研究均未引用先前发表的关于甜味溶液的系统评价。
对中国数据库的这项系统评价显示了与先前发表的系统评价相同的结果。本评价纳入的试验均未引用英文系统评价,凸显了一个平行的研究议程。