Murray G D
Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Br J Surg. 1988 Jul;75(7):664-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750714.
The results are presented of an audit of the statistical standard of papers published in The British Journal of Surgery. A number of deficiencies are highlighted, many of which stem from an over-emphasis on statistical significance at the expense of any assessment of the clinical relevance of research findings. The flaws in the design of published studies, and in particular the many instances of inadequate sample sizes, emphasize that statistical input should be sought at the beginning of a research project rather than at the end.
本文展示了对发表于《英国外科杂志》上论文的统计学标准审核结果。文中强调了诸多不足之处,其中许多源于过度强调统计学显著性,却忽视了对研究结果临床相关性的评估。已发表研究在设计上存在缺陷,尤其是样本量不足的情况屡见不鲜,这凸显出应在研究项目伊始而非结束时就寻求统计学方面的支持。