Bourcier Jean-Eudes, Gallard Emeric, Redonnet Jean-Philippe, Majourau Magali, Deshaie Dominique, Bourgeois Jean-Marie, Garnier Didier, Geeraerts Thomas
Emergency, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Lourdes Hospital, 2 Avenue Alexandre Marqui, 65100, Lourdes, France.
CFFE (Centre Francophone de Formation en Echographie), Nîmes, France.
Crit Ultrasound J. 2018 Nov 23;10(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13089-018-0112-5.
Right iliac fossa abdominal pain is a common reason for emergency ward admissions, its etiology is difficult to diagnose. It can be facilitated by an imaging examination, such as a Computerized Tomography scan which exposes the patient to ionizing radiation and implies delays. A bedside ultrasound performed by emergency physicians could avoid these issues. The aim of our study was to assess the performance of ultrasound carried out at the patient's bedside by an emergency physician compared with a clinical-laboratory examination for the diagnosis of a surgical pathology in right iliac fossa pain.
This is a single-center prospective cohort study conducted in an Emergency Department receiving 19,000 patients per year. All patients presenting pain in the right iliac fossa were included by four (out of ten) emergency physicians certified in an ultrasound examination. A full grid pattern scan ultrasound of the abdominal cavity with analysis of the right iliac fossa was performed. The primary outcome was to compare the diagnosis performance of bedside ultrasound and clinical-laboratory examination to detect a surgical pathology. Two emergency physicians who did not participate in the study made the final diagnosis (i.e., surgical or non-surgical pathology) by reviewing the entire medical chart of each patient.
From January 2011 to July 2013, 158 patients with a median age of 17 [13-32] years were analyzed. The diagnosed cases were: appendicitis (53), non-specific abdominal pain (48), lymphadenitis (22), ileitis (11), complicated ovarian cysts (7), neoplasias (5), inflammatory or infectious colitis (5), inguinal herniations (3), bowel obstructions (2), and salpingitis (2). The accuracy of ultrasound diagnoses was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.94) versus 0.70 (95% CI 0.57-0.82) for diagnoses based on clinical-laboratory examination only (p < 0.001).
Bedsides, ultrasound allows an accurate diagnosis of a surgical pathology in 89% of cases, which is more efficient than the clinical-laboratory examination.
右下腹疼痛是急诊病房收治患者的常见原因,其病因难以诊断。影像学检查有助于诊断,如计算机断层扫描,但会使患者暴露于电离辐射且可能导致诊断延迟。急诊医生进行的床旁超声检查可避免这些问题。我们研究的目的是评估急诊医生在患者床旁进行的超声检查与临床实验室检查相比,对诊断右下腹疼痛的外科病理情况的效能。
这是一项在每年接收19000名患者的急诊科进行的单中心前瞻性队列研究。所有右下腹疼痛的患者由四名(共十名)获得超声检查认证的急诊医生纳入研究。对腹腔进行全网格模式扫描超声检查,并对右下腹进行分析。主要结局是比较床旁超声检查和临床实验室检查对检测外科病理情况的诊断效能。两名未参与研究的急诊医生通过查阅每位患者的完整病历做出最终诊断(即外科或非外科病理)。
2011年1月至2013年7月,分析了158例患者,中位年龄为17岁[13 - 32岁]。诊断病例包括:阑尾炎(53例)、非特异性腹痛(48例)、淋巴结炎(22例)、回肠炎(11例)、复杂性卵巢囊肿(7例)、肿瘤(5例)、炎症性或感染性结肠炎(5例)、腹股沟疝(3例)、肠梗阻(2例)和输卵管炎(2例)。超声诊断的准确性为0.89(95%置信区间0.84 - 0.94),而仅基于临床实验室检查的诊断准确性为0.70(95%置信区间0.57 - 0.82)(p < 0.001)。
床旁超声检查在89%的病例中能准确诊断外科病理情况,比临床实验室检查更有效。