Suppr超能文献

磁共振成像和超声在诊断性及非诊断性研究中对阑尾炎诊断的准确性

Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound for Appendicitis in Diagnostic and Nondiagnostic Studies.

作者信息

Kearl Y Liza, Claudius Ilene, Behar Sol, Cooper John, Dollbaum Ryan, Hardasmalani Madhu, Hardiman Kevin, Rose Emily, Santillanes Genevieve, Berdahl Carl

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.

Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Hospital, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;23(2):179-85. doi: 10.1111/acem.12873. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Suggestive radiographic studies with nonvisualization of the appendix can present a challenge to clinicians in the evaluation of pediatric abdominal pain. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and of ultrasound (US) in the setting of nonvisualization of the appendix. Secondary objectives reported include sensitivity of MRI and US overall and correlation between MRI and US for diagnosis of appendicitis.

METHODS

Records of pediatric emergency department patients aged 3 to 21 years undergoing MRI and/or US for the evaluation of appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographs were categorized as a normal appendix, neither demonstrating the appendix nor demonstrating abnormalities consistent with appendicitis; equivocal, not demonstrating the appendix but showing evidence of appendicitis; demonstrating an abnormal appendix consistent with appendicitis; or demonstrating an alternate pathology. The reading was compared with the final diagnosis for accuracy.

RESULTS

Of the 589 patients included, 146 had appendicitis. Diagnostic accuracy for studies with a nonvisualized appendix without secondary signs of appendicitis was 100% for MRI and 91.4% (95% CI = 87.3% to 94.2%) for US. Diagnostic accuracy for studies with a nonvisualized appendix with secondary signs of appendicitis was 50% (95% CI = 2.5% to 97.5%) for MRI and 38.9% (95% CI = 18.2% to 64.5%) for US. Appendicitis was ultimately diagnosed in 8.6% of patients with an otherwise negative right lower quadrant (RLQ) US that failed to directly identify the appendix. There was a moderate correlation between US and MRI (ρ = 0.573, p = 0.0001) when all studies were considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging without secondary signs of appendicitis is effective in excluding appendicitis regardless of whether the appendix is directly visualized, while otherwise negative RLQ US that fail to identify the appendix are less useful. Secondary signs of appendicitis without visualization of the appendix were not helpful regardless of radiographic modality. Results of MRI and US correlated moderately well.

摘要

目的

提示性影像学检查未显示阑尾时,可能给临床医生评估小儿腹痛带来挑战。本研究的主要目的是量化在阑尾未显影情况下磁共振成像(MRI)和超声(US)的准确性。报告的次要目的包括MRI和US的总体敏感性以及两者在阑尾炎诊断方面的相关性。

方法

回顾性分析3至21岁因评估阑尾炎而接受MRI和/或US检查的儿科急诊科患者的记录。X线片分为正常阑尾,既未显示阑尾也未显示与阑尾炎相符的异常;不明确,未显示阑尾但有阑尾炎证据;显示与阑尾炎相符的异常阑尾;或显示其他病理情况。将读片结果与最终诊断进行准确性比较。

结果

纳入的589例患者中,146例患有阑尾炎。对于未显示阑尾且无阑尾炎次要征象的检查,MRI的诊断准确性为100%,US为91.4%(95%可信区间 = 87.3%至94.2%)。对于未显示阑尾但有阑尾炎次要征象的检查,MRI的诊断准确性为50%(95%可信区间 = 2.5%至97.5%),US为38.9%(95%可信区间 = 18.2%至64.5%)。在右下象限(RLQ)US检查结果为阴性但未直接发现阑尾的患者中,最终有8.6%被诊断为阑尾炎。当考虑所有检查时,US和MRI之间存在中度相关性(ρ = 0.573,p = 0.0001)。

结论

无论阑尾是否直接显影,无阑尾炎次要征象的磁共振成像在排除阑尾炎方面有效,而未发现阑尾的RLQ US检查结果为阴性时则用处较小。无论采用何种影像学检查方式,未显影阑尾的阑尾炎次要征象均无帮助。MRI和US的结果相关性中等。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验