• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国精神分裂症患者从口服抗精神病药物转换为阿立哌唑长效注射剂后的住院率及资源利用情况

Hospitalization rates and resource utilization of schizophrenic patients switched from oral antipsychotics to aripiprazole-depot in Germany.

作者信息

Potempa Christoph, Rychlik Reinhard

机构信息

Institute of Empirical Health Economics, Am Ziegelfeld 28, 51399, Burscheid, Germany.

出版信息

Health Econ Rev. 2018 Nov 23;8(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13561-018-0215-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13561-018-0215-5
PMID:30470936
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6755603/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Examine cost-driving factors of schizophrenia in Germany for patients prior- and post-switch from an oral antipsychotic therapy to aripiprazole-depot and perform a budget impact analysis (BIA) referring to the context of German health care.

METHODS

A single-armed, retrospective, non-interventional pre-post comparison study with 132 patients to compare the total psychiatric hospitalization rates and the associated costs of both, the treatment with oral antipsychotics and aripiprazole-depot. The BIA was performed to compare both treatment periods with respect to health-related costs. A subsequent univariate sensitivity analysis examined the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

After switching the treatment to aripiprazole-depot, the total psychiatric hospitalization rates for the 6-month treatment period were significantly (p < 0.001) lower (14%) compared to the hospitalization rates when treated with oral antipsychotics (55.1%). 18.2% of the patients reported to be employed, with 29.2% having work incapacities. The mean number of schizophrenia episodes was 2.58 episodes per patient during the oral-antipsychotic treatment compared to 0.41 episodes per patient during the aripiprazole-depot phase (p < 0.001). The treatment with aripiprazole-depot also significantly reduced the mean number of hospitalizations per patient (0.63 to 0.16, p < 0.001) and the mean number of hospitalized days (27.39 to 5.56, p < 0.001) compared to the oral antipsychotic treatment. Additionally a significant reduction of the mean stay in day-clinics and psychiatric institute ambulances (PIAs) was observed (46.13 days to 7.29 days, p < 0.01). Treatment of a patient suffering from schizophrenia with oral antipsychotics produced costs of 9935.38€ (direct costs: 9498.36 €), while aripiprazole-depot generated costs of 4557.56€ (direct costs: 4449.83 €) per patient for a one-year observation period. This resulted in total costs of 6,517,606,265.43€ for the oral antipsychotic treatment and 2,989,756,603.05€ for aripiprazole-depot treatment from the perspective of the German health care system. The results remained robust during sensitivity analysis, with aripiprazole-depot being the more cost-effective strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that aripiprazole-depot treatment for schizophrenia patients has major potential in terms of cost savings for the German statutory health insurance.

摘要

目的

研究德国精神分裂症患者从口服抗精神病药物治疗转换为阿立哌唑长效针剂治疗前后的成本驱动因素,并结合德国医疗保健背景进行预算影响分析(BIA)。

方法

一项单臂、回顾性、非干预性的前后对照研究,纳入132例患者,比较口服抗精神病药物治疗和阿立哌唑长效针剂治疗的总精神科住院率及相关成本。进行BIA以比较两个治疗阶段的健康相关成本。随后进行单因素敏感性分析以检验结果的稳健性。

结果

转换为阿立哌唑长效针剂治疗后,6个月治疗期的总精神科住院率显著低于口服抗精神病药物治疗时(p < 0.001),降低了14%(口服抗精神病药物治疗时住院率为55.1%)。18.2%的患者报告有工作,29.2%的患者无工作能力。口服抗精神病药物治疗期间,每位患者精神分裂症发作的平均次数为2.58次,而阿立哌唑长效针剂治疗阶段每位患者为0.41次(p < 0.001)。与口服抗精神病药物治疗相比,阿立哌唑长效针剂治疗还显著降低了每位患者的平均住院次数(从0.63次降至0.16次,p < 0.001)和平均住院天数(从27.39天降至5.56天,p < 0.001)。此外,日间诊所和精神病院救护车(PIA)的平均停留时间也显著减少(从46.13天降至7.29天,p < 0.01)。口服抗精神病药物治疗一名精神分裂症患者的成本为9935.38欧元(直接成本:9498.36欧元),而阿立哌唑长效针剂治疗每位患者一年观察期的成本为4557.56欧元(直接成本:4449.83欧元)。从德国医疗保健系统的角度来看,口服抗精神病药物治疗的总成本为6517606265.43欧元,阿立哌唑长效针剂治疗的总成本为2989756603.05欧元。在敏感性分析中结果仍然稳健,阿立哌唑长效针剂是更具成本效益的策略。

结论

结果表明,阿立哌唑长效针剂治疗精神分裂症患者对德国法定医疗保险而言在成本节约方面具有重大潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38ea/6755603/a61ea3374fc3/13561_2018_215_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38ea/6755603/cfae11df9ef8/13561_2018_215_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38ea/6755603/a61ea3374fc3/13561_2018_215_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38ea/6755603/cfae11df9ef8/13561_2018_215_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38ea/6755603/a61ea3374fc3/13561_2018_215_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Hospitalization rates and resource utilization of schizophrenic patients switched from oral antipsychotics to aripiprazole-depot in Germany.德国精神分裂症患者从口服抗精神病药物转换为阿立哌唑长效注射剂后的住院率及资源利用情况
Health Econ Rev. 2018 Nov 23;8(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13561-018-0215-5.
2
Cost effectiveness of long-acting risperidone injection versus alternative antipsychotic agents in patients with schizophrenia in the USA.长效利培酮注射剂与其他抗精神病药物在美国精神分裂症患者中的成本效益比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23 Suppl 1:75-89. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523001-00007.
3
Inpatient resource use and costs associated with switching from oral antipsychotics to aripiprazole once-monthly for the treatment of schizophrenia.住院患者从口服抗精神病药物换用阿立哌唑每月一次治疗精神分裂症的资源使用情况及成本。
Drugs Context. 2016 Mar 11;5:212273. doi: 10.7573/dic.212273. eCollection 2016.
4
Safety and tolerability of once monthly aripiprazole treatment initiation in adults with schizophrenia stabilized on selected atypical oral antipsychotics other than aripiprazole.在稳定使用非阿立哌唑的特定非典型口服抗精神病药物的精神分裂症成人患者中,起始每月一次阿立哌唑治疗的安全性和耐受性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Oct;29(10):1241-51. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.821973. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
5
[Comparison of medical and economic benefits of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia in France].[法国抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的医学与经济效益比较]
Encephale. 2017 Aug;43(4):311-320. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
6
Relapse rates in patients with schizophrenia receiving aripiprazole in comparison with other atypical antipsychotics.与其他非典型抗精神病药物相比,接受阿立哌唑治疗的精神分裂症患者的复发率。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;67(12):1942-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n1215.
7
Treatment Patterns, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Spending in Medicaid Beneficiaries Initiating Second-generation Long-acting Injectable Agents Versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics.启动第二代长效注射剂与口服非典型抗精神病药物的医疗补助受益人的治疗模式、医疗资源利用及支出情况
Clin Ther. 2017 Oct;39(10):1972-1985.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
8
Decline in hospitalization risk and health care cost after initiation of depot antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia.长效抗精神病药物用于治疗精神分裂症后住院风险及医疗费用的下降情况。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;3:9-14. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S16061. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of switching antipsychotic medication to long-acting injectable risperidone in patients with schizophrenia : a 12- and 24-month follow-up from the e-STAR database in Spain.精神分裂症患者抗精神病药物换用长效注射用利培酮的成本效益分析:来自西班牙e-STAR数据库的12个月和24个月随访
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2008;6(1):41-53. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200806010-00004.
10
Schizophrenia relapse and the clinical usefulness of once-monthly aripiprazole depot injection.精神分裂症复发与阿立哌唑长效注射剂每月 1 次的临床应用
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Aug 30;10:1605-11. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S52486. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Better treatment outcomes with aripiprazole long-acting injection in community and incarcerated patients with serious mental illness.阿立哌唑长效注射剂用于社区及监禁环境下的严重精神疾病患者可带来更好的治疗效果。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 8;16:1499400. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1499400. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Second Generation Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotics Based on Nationwide Database Research in Hungary: An Update.基于匈牙利全国数据库研究的第二代长效注射用抗精神病药物的比较疗效:最新情况
Schizophr Bull Open. 2022 Jan 31;3(1):sgac013. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac013. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3

本文引用的文献

1
[Disability Pension and Productivity Loss in Schizophrenia - An Empirical Analysis of the Financial Burden in Germany].
Psychiatr Prax. 2017 Mar;44(2):93-98. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-104089. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
2
Understanding the direct and indirect costs of patients with schizophrenia.了解精神分裂症患者的直接和间接成本。
F1000Res. 2015 Jul 6;4:182. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6699.2. eCollection 2015.
3
Hospitalization rates in patients switched from oral anti-psychotics to aripiprazole once-monthly: final efficacy analysis.从口服抗精神病药物转换为每月一次阿立哌唑治疗的患者的住院率:最终疗效分析。
Healthcare resource use and costs reduction with aripiprazole once-monthly in schizophrenia: AMBITION, a real-world study.
阿立哌唑每月一次用药对精神分裂症患者医疗资源使用及成本的降低作用:AMBITION一项真实世界研究
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 4;14:1207307. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1207307. eCollection 2023.
4
Long-Term Real-World Effectiveness of Aripiprazole Once-Monthly. Treatment Persistence and Its Correlates in the Italian and Spanish Clinical Practice: A Pooled Analysis.阿立哌唑每月一次给药的长期真实世界有效性。意大利和西班牙临床实践中的治疗持续性及其相关因素:一项汇总分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 28;13:877867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.877867. eCollection 2022.
5
Time to Treatment Discontinuation in German Patients with Schizophrenia: Long-Acting Injectables versus Oral Antipsychotics.德国精神分裂症患者停药时间:长效注射剂与口服抗精神病药。
Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Jan;41(1):99-113. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00990-8. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
Hospitalization Rates and Therapy Costs of German Schizophrenia Patients Who are Initiated on Long-Acting Injectable Medication: A Mirror-Image Study.德国首发长效注射药物精神分裂症患者的住院率和治疗费用:一项镜像研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Apr;40(4):355-375. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00900-y.
7
Comparative effectiveness of second generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics based on nationwide database research in Hungary.基于匈牙利全国性数据库研究的第二代长效注射抗精神病药物的比较效果。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 13;14(6):e0218071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218071. eCollection 2019.
J Med Econ. 2015 Feb;18(2):145-54. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.979936. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
4
Systematic review of long-acting injectables versus oral atypical antipsychotics on hospitalization in schizophrenia.长效注射剂与口服非典型抗精神病药物对精神分裂症住院治疗影响的系统评价
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Aug;30(8):1643-55. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.915211. Epub 2014 May 2.
5
Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.预算影响分析——良好实践原则:ISPOR 2012 预算影响分析良好实践 II 工作组报告。
Value Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
6
Long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of mirror-image studies.长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症的比较:镜像研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;74(10):957-65. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13r08440.
7
Healthcare cost reductions associated with the use of LAI formulations of antipsychotic medications versus oral among patients with schizophrenia.与口服抗精神病药物相比,使用长效注射(LAI)制剂治疗精神分裂症患者所带来的医疗成本降低情况。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul;40(3):355-66. doi: 10.1007/s11414-013-9329-z.
8
World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: update 2012 on the long-term treatment of schizophrenia and management of antipsychotic-induced side effects.世界生物精神病学学会联合会(WFSBP)精神分裂症生物治疗指南,第 2 部分:2012 年关于精神分裂症长期治疗和抗精神病药引起的副作用管理的更新。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;14(1):2-44. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2012.739708. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
9
Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010.2010 年欧洲大脑疾病负担成本。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Oct;21(10):718-79. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
10
[The cost of schizophrenia in Germany: a systematic review of the literature].[德国精神分裂症的成本:文献系统综述]
Psychiatr Prax. 2009 Jul;36(5):211-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1090234. Epub 2009 May 12.