Suppr超能文献

德国精神分裂症患者停药时间:长效注射剂与口服抗精神病药。

Time to Treatment Discontinuation in German Patients with Schizophrenia: Long-Acting Injectables versus Oral Antipsychotics.

机构信息

Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Neuss, Germany.

Düsseldorf Institute of Competition Economics (DICE), University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Jan;41(1):99-113. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00990-8. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are associated with better treatment adherence and persistence than oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in patients with schizophrenia. However, real-world evidence assessing the impact of treatment with LAIs in Germany is limited. To fill this gap, we compared antipsychotic medication adherence and risk of treatment discontinuation (TD) among schizophrenia patients newly initiated on LAI or who switched their OAP regimen (overall cohort; OC).

METHODS

Claims data of German schizophrenia patients who initiated LAIs or switched their OAP during 2012-2016 (index date) were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment switch was defined as add-on medication to existing prescription or terminating the existing prescription and initiating another OAP. Adherence and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) were estimated. Determinants of treatment discontinuation were analyzed using two Cox regression models. Model 1 controlled for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI); model 2 also included insurance status, and medication, visit, and psychiatric inpatient stay costs. Sensitivity analysis on patients who terminated existing prescriptions and initiated new OAPs (complete switch cohort; CSC) was performed.

RESULTS

In OC (n = 2650), LAI users had better adherence (35.4% vs. 11.6%), persistence (no 60-day gap; 40.7% vs. 19.8%), and longer TTD (median [95% confidence interval (CI)] 216 [193-249] vs. 50 [46-56] days) than OAP users. OAP usage (hazard ratio [HR] 1.89, 95% CI 1.73-2.06; p < 0.001) and greater CCI (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.07; p = 0.023) were associated with greater risk of TD in model 1. Model 2 showed similar results. LAI users in CSC also had better adherence, persistence, and longer TTD. In CSC too, OAP usage and greater CCI were associated with greater risk of TD in model 1, but only CCI was significant in model 2. Higher pre-index psychiatric inpatient costs were associated with lower risk of TD (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00; p = 0.014).

LIMITATIONS

Inherent limitations of claims data and lack of control on OAP administration may have influenced the results.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study associates LAIs with better medication adherence and lower antipsychotic discontinuation risk than OAPs.

摘要

背景与目的

长效注射抗精神病药(LAIs)与口服抗精神病药(OAPs)相比,可提高精神分裂症患者的治疗依从性和持续性。然而,德国评估 LAI 治疗效果的真实世界证据有限。为了填补这一空白,我们比较了新开始使用 LAI 或转换 OAP 方案的精神分裂症患者的抗精神病药物依从性和停药风险(总体队列;OC)。

方法

回顾性分析了 2012-2016 年期间开始使用 LAI 或转换 OAP 的德国精神分裂症患者的索赔数据(索引日期)。治疗转换定义为在现有处方中添加药物或终止现有处方并开始使用另一种 OAP。估计了治疗依从性和停药时间(TTD)。使用两个 Cox 回归模型分析停药的决定因素。模型 1 控制了年龄、性别和 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI);模型 2 还包括了保险状况、药物、就诊和精神病住院费用。对终止现有处方并开始使用新 OAP 的患者(完全转换队列;CSC)进行了敏感性分析。

结果

在 OC(n=2650)中,与 OAP 使用者相比,LAI 使用者的依从性更好(35.4% vs. 11.6%),持续性更高(无 60 天间隔;40.7% vs. 19.8%),TTD 更长(中位数[95%置信区间(CI)] 216[193-249] vs. 50[46-56]天)。OAP 使用率(风险比[HR] 1.89,95% CI 1.73-2.06;p<0.001)和更高的 CCI(HR 1.04,95% CI 1.00-1.07;p=0.023)与模型 1 中更高的 TD 风险相关。模型 2 也显示了类似的结果。CSC 中的 LAI 使用者也具有更好的依从性、持续性和更长的 TTD。在 CSC 中,OAP 使用率和更高的 CCI 与模型 1 中更高的 TD 风险相关,但只有 CCI 在模型 2 中具有统计学意义。较高的指数前精神病住院费用与较低的 TD 风险相关(HR 0.99,95% CI 0.98-1.00;p=0.014)。

局限性

索赔数据固有的局限性和 OAP 管理的缺乏可能影响了结果。

结论

这项真实世界的研究表明,与 OAP 相比,LAIs 可提高精神分裂症患者的药物依从性并降低抗精神病药物停药风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82e5/7815621/8e54659b91f1/40261_2020_990_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验