Suppr超能文献

家庭式渐进抗阻训练或高强度循环训练是否能提高脑瘫儿童的力量、功能、活动或参与度?

Does Home-Based Progressive Resistance or High-Intensity Circuit Training Improve Strength, Function, Activity or Participation in Children With Cerebral Palsy?

机构信息

Paediatric Orthopaedic Unit, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Institute of Sport Science, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Dec;99(12):2457-2464.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Does home-based progressive resistance or high-intensity circuit training improve strength, function, activity, or participation in children with cerebral palsy (CP)?

DESIGN

This was the first study on high-intensity circuit training for children with CP. This study was conducted as a randomized prospective controlled pilot study.

SETTING

Evaluation took place at the gait laboratory of the university hospital, training sessions were performed at home.

PARTICIPANTS

Children (N=22) with CP (average age: 12y, 10mo, 19 Gross Motor Function Classification System level I, 3 level II) were randomly assigned either to progressive resistance training (PRT) or high-intensity circuit training (HICT).

INTERVENTIONS

The PRT group trained with progressive overload, while the HICT group performed as many repetitions as possible within 30-second intervals (8wk, 3 times weekly in both groups).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures stretched over all domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and included muscle strength, muscle power sprint test (MPST), timed stairs test (TST), 6-minute walking test, Gait Profile Score (GPS), timed Up and Go test (TUGT) and participation questionnaires.

RESULTS

Only the HICT group was able to improve strength. Furthermore, the HICT group scored better in the MPST, while PRT participants improved in the TST and TUGT. The HICT-group was able to show improvement in the subscores of the parent-reported participation questionnaire. Other measures of mobility or participation did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Both programs improved function specific to intervention. However, only the HICT group showed significant strength and participation improvements. Compliance was decent in both groups, but the average training unit was shorter in the HICT group. Both exercise programs showed functional benefits, but HICT might be the preferable option for strengthening in highly functional children with CP.

摘要

目的

家庭为基础的渐进式抗阻训练或高强度循环训练是否能提高脑瘫(CP)儿童的力量、功能、活动或参与度?

设计

这是第一项针对 CP 儿童进行高强度循环训练的研究。这是一项随机前瞻性对照初步研究。

设置

评估在大学医院的步态实验室进行,训练在家庭中进行。

参与者

22 名 CP 儿童(平均年龄:12 岁,10 个月,19 名粗大运动功能分级系统 I 级,3 名 II 级)被随机分配到渐进式抗阻训练(PRT)或高强度循环训练(HICT)组。

干预

PRT 组进行渐进性超负荷训练,而 HICT 组则在 30 秒的间隔内尽可能多地完成重复动作(两组均为 8 周,每周 3 次)。

主要观察指标

观察指标涵盖国际功能、残疾和健康分类的所有领域,包括肌肉力量、肌肉爆发力冲刺测试(MPST)、定时楼梯测试(TST)、6 分钟步行测试、步态分析评分(GPS)、计时起立行走测试(TUGT)和参与问卷。

结果

只有 HICT 组的力量得到了提高。此外,HICT 组在 MPST 中的得分更好,而 PRT 参与者在 TST 和 TUGT 中的得分有所提高。HICT 组在家长报告的参与问卷的子量表中也能显示出改善。其他移动性或参与度的测量指标没有变化。

结论

两种方案均改善了特定于干预的功能。然而,只有 HICT 组显示出显著的力量和参与度的改善。两组的依从性都不错,但 HICT 组的平均训练单元较短。两种运动方案都显示出了功能上的益处,但 HICT 可能是 CP 高度功能性儿童增强力量的首选方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验