From the Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina (A.S.H.) Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University Hospitals of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (P.K.) Department of Anesthesiology, Wexner Medical Center at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (S.D.B.) Department of Anesthesia, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (F.C.) Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Anesthesiology Institute, Outcomes Research, Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio (S.A.) Department of Anesthesia, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (N.S.) Department of Anesthesiology, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (J.M.) Hermann Drive Surgical Hospital, Houston, Texas (D.G.L.) Helen Keller Hospital, Sheffield, Alabama (T.I.M.) Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, CHU de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France (P.D.) Acacia Pharma Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom (G.M.F.) Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida (K.A.C.).
Anesthesiology. 2019 Feb;130(2):203-212. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002509.
Although antiemetics are commonly used to prevent postoperative nausea or vomiting, the failure rate is appreciable and there is currently no generally accepted standard for rescue treatment of postoperative nausea or vomiting after failed prophylaxis. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was designed to test the hypothesis that intravenous amisulpride, a dopamine D2/D3-antagonist, is superior to placebo at treating established postoperative nausea or vomiting after failed prophylaxis.
A total of 2,285 adult patients undergoing surgery under general inhalational anesthesia and receiving standard antiemetic prophylaxis were enrolled at 23 sites in Canada, France, Germany, and the United States. Of these, 702 patients experienced postoperative nausea or vomiting in the 24-h period after surgery and were randomized to receive a single dose of 5 or 10 mg intravenous amisulpride or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was complete response, defined as no emesis or rescue antiemetic use for 24 h after study drug administration, excluding emesis in the first 30 min. Secondary endpoints included incidence of emesis and rescue medication use, nausea burden, time to treatment failure, and length of stay in postanesthesia care unit and hospital.
Complete response occurred in significantly more patients receiving 10 mg amisulpride (96 of 230, 41.7%) than placebo (67 of 235, 28.5%), a 13.2% difference (95% CI, 4.6 to 21.8; odds ratio, 1.80; P = 0.006). A 5-mg dose of amisulpride did not show a significant benefit (80 of 237, 33.8%); the difference from placebo was 5.2% (95% CI, 3.1 to 13.6; odds ratio, 1.24; P = 0.109). The total number of adverse events recorded and proportion of patients with at least one adverse event were comparable between the placebo and amisulpride groups. No clinically relevant toxicities were observed.
A single 10-mg dose of intravenous amisulpride was safe and more effective than placebo at treating established postoperative nausea or vomiting in patients failing postoperative nausea or vomiting prophylaxis.
尽管止吐药常用于预防术后恶心或呕吐,但失败率仍然很高,目前对于预防失败后的术后恶心或呕吐,尚无普遍接受的补救治疗标准。本前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组、安慰剂对照、多中心研究旨在检验这样一个假设,即多巴胺 D2/D3 拮抗剂静脉注射氨磺必利在治疗预防失败后的已确立的术后恶心或呕吐方面优于安慰剂。
共有 2285 名在加拿大、法国、德国和美国的 23 个地点接受全身吸入麻醉下手术并接受标准止吐预防的成年患者入组。其中,702 名患者在术后 24 小时内出现术后恶心或呕吐,并随机接受单次 5 或 10mg 静脉注射氨磺必利或匹配的安慰剂。主要终点是完全缓解,定义为研究药物给药后 24 小时内无呕吐或使用解救性止吐药,不包括前 30 分钟的呕吐。次要终点包括呕吐和解救药物使用的发生率、恶心负担、治疗失败时间以及术后恢复室和医院的住院时间。
接受 10mg 氨磺必利治疗的患者中有更多患者(230 例中的 96 例,41.7%)发生完全缓解,而安慰剂组(235 例中的 67 例,28.5%),差异为 13.2%(95%置信区间,4.6 至 21.8;比值比,1.80;P=0.006)。5mg 剂量的氨磺必利未显示出显著获益(237 例中的 80 例,33.8%);与安慰剂相比差异为 5.2%(95%置信区间,3.1 至 13.6;比值比,1.24;P=0.109)。记录的不良事件总数和至少有一次不良事件的患者比例在安慰剂和氨磺必利组之间相似。未观察到有临床意义的毒性。
单次 10mg 剂量的静脉注射氨磺必利在预防失败后的术后恶心或呕吐患者中,与安慰剂相比,安全且更有效。