• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国卓越研究框架与马太效应:来自机器学习的启示。

The UK Research Excellence Framework and the Matthew effect: Insights from machine learning.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0207919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207919. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0207919
PMID:30475868
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6258235/
Abstract

With the high cost of the research assessment exercises in the UK, many have called for simpler and less time-consuming alternatives. In this work, we gathered publicly available REF data, combined them with library-subscribed data, and used machine learning to examine whether the overall result of the Research Excellence Framework 2014 could be replicated. A Bayesian additive regression tree model predicting university grade point average (GPA) from an initial set of 18 candidate explanatory variables was developed. One hundred and nine universities were randomly divided into a training set (n = 79) and test set (n = 30). The model "learned" associations between GPA and the other variables in the training set and was made to predict the GPA of universities in the test set. GPA could be predicted from just three variables: the number of Web of Science documents, entry tariff, and percentage of students coming from state schools (r-squared = .88). Implications of this finding are discussed and proposals are given.

摘要

随着英国研究评估工作成本的增加,许多人呼吁采用更简单、耗时更少的替代方案。在这项工作中,我们收集了公开可用的 REF 数据,将其与图书馆订阅数据相结合,并使用机器学习来检验 2014 年研究卓越框架的总体结果是否可以复制。我们开发了一个贝叶斯加法回归树模型,该模型从一组 18 个候选解释变量中预测大学平均绩点 (GPA)。109 所大学被随机分为训练集 (n = 79) 和测试集 (n = 30)。该模型在训练集中“学习”了 GPA 与其他变量之间的关联,并被要求预测测试集中大学的 GPA。仅通过三个变量就可以预测 GPA:Web of Science 文档数量、入学关税和来自公立学校的学生比例(r-squared =.88)。讨论了这一发现的意义,并提出了建议。

相似文献

1
The UK Research Excellence Framework and the Matthew effect: Insights from machine learning.英国卓越研究框架与马太效应:来自机器学习的启示。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0207919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207919. eCollection 2018.
2
Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.大学生学业表现的心理相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Mar;138(2):353-87. doi: 10.1037/a0026838.
3
Determining graduation rate of students who initially enrolled as animal science majors at the University of Missouri during a consecutive four-year period.确定在密苏里大学连续四年入学的动物科学专业学生的毕业率。
J Anim Sci. 2009 Nov;87(11):3825-9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-1990. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
4
Use of a Machine-learning Method for Predicting Highly Cited Articles Within General Radiology Journals.一种用于预测普通放射学期刊中高被引文章的机器学习方法的应用。
Acad Radiol. 2016 Dec;23(12):1573-1581. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Evidence-based selection process to the Master of Public Health program at Medical University.医学大学公共卫生硕士课程的循证选择过程。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 11;17(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1007-z.
6
Attention problems and hyperactivity as predictors of college grade point average.注意力问题和多动作为大学平均绩点的预测指标。
J Atten Disord. 2007 Nov;11(3):368-73. doi: 10.1177/1087054707305155. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
7
UK Doubles Its "World-Leading" Research in Life Sciences and Medicine in Six Years: Testing the Claim?英国在六年内将其生命科学与医学领域“世界领先”的研究成果翻倍:这一说法经得起检验吗?
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 23;10(7):e0132990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132990. eCollection 2015.
8
Rethinking Dental School Admission Criteria: Correlation Between Pre-Admission Variables and First-Year Performance for Six Classes at One Dental School.重新思考牙科学院录取标准:一所牙科学院六个班级入学前变量与一年级成绩之间的相关性。
J Dent Educ. 2018 Apr;82(4):411-416. doi: 10.21815/JDE.018.042.
9
Does the medical college admission test predict global academic performance in osteopathic medical school?医学院入学考试能否预测整骨医学院的整体学业表现?
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007 Apr;107(4):157-62.
10
The droso4schools project: Long-term scientist-teacher collaborations to promote science communication and education in schools.droso4schools 项目:长期的科学家-教师合作,以促进学校的科学传播和教育。
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Oct;70:73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the application of machine learning to expert evaluation of research impact.探索机器学习在专家评估研究影响力中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0288469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288469. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Can we open the black box of AI?我们能打开人工智能的黑匣子吗?
Nature. 2016 Oct 6;538(7623):20-23. doi: 10.1038/538020a.
2
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.文献计量学:《莱顿研究指标宣言》
Nature. 2015 Apr 23;520(7548):429-31. doi: 10.1038/520429a.
3
Has the Research Excellence Framework killed creativity?卓越研究框架扼杀了创造力吗?
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Apr;22(3):155-6. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12217.
4
Science publishing: The golden club.科学出版:黄金俱乐部。
Nature. 2013 Oct 17;502(7471):291-3. doi: 10.1038/502291a.
5
Research assessments: Judgement day.研究评估:审判日。
Nature. 2013 Oct 17;502(7471):288-90. doi: 10.1038/502288a.
6
Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding.大科学与小科学:科学影响力如何随资金投入而变化
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 19;8(6):e65263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065263. Print 2013.
7
Optimally splitting cases for training and testing high dimensional classifiers.最优地拆分高维分类器的训练和测试案例。
BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Apr 8;4:31. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-31.
8
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
9
Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System exceeds the cost of giving every qualified researcher a baseline grant.加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会(NSERC)科研资助同行评审系统的成本超过了给每位合格研究人员提供基准资助的成本。
Account Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;16(1):13-40. doi: 10.1080/08989620802689821.
10
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.一个用于量化个人科研产出的指标。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 15;102(46):16569-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. Epub 2005 Nov 7.