Instituto Biofisika (CSIC, UPV/EHU), Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidad del País Vasco, 48940 Leioa, Spain.
Chem Phys Lipids. 2019 Jan;218:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
The membrane raft hypothesis, proposed in 1997 by Simons and Ikonen, has played a paradoxical role in the history of biomembrane research. While it has generated a large amount of investigations, thus helping to increase our understanding of membranes, the object that gives name to the hypothesis, i.e. the raft itself, has been and still is an object of controversy, in which its very reality is often questioned. In this contribution I review the history of the hypothesis and its reception by membrane biologists, and summarize some of the valuable physico-chemical results that have been obtained while testing the raft hypothesis. To save a useful concept from its many misuses I propose that the expression "(transient) nanodomains" be employed instead of "rafts".
膜筏假说由 Simons 和 Ikonen 于 1997 年提出,在生物膜研究的历史上扮演了一个矛盾的角色。虽然它引发了大量的研究,从而有助于增加我们对膜的理解,但该假说所命名的对象,即筏本身,一直是并且仍然是争议的对象,其真实性经常受到质疑。在这篇综述中,我回顾了该假说的历史及其在膜生物学家中的接受情况,并总结了在检验该假说过程中获得的一些有价值的物理化学结果。为了避免一个有用的概念被其许多误用所困扰,我建议用“(瞬态)纳米域”来代替“筏”。