School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Creswick, VIC 3363, Australia.
School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Creswick, VIC 3363, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 15;232:243-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.063. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
Impacts of wildfire on humans are increasing as urban populations continue to expand into fire prone landscapes. Effective fire risk management can only be achieved if we understand and quantify how ecosystems change in response to fire and how these changes affect flammability. However, there have been limited studies to this effect with the dominant paradigm being the assumption that recently burnt vegetation is less flammable than older vegetation. To better quantify changes in flammability, we first need to quantify trajectories of changes in response to fire within individual vegetation communities. Second, we need to examine the extent to which these changes alter flammability. Here, we quantify the flammability pathways with increasing time since fire for five vegetation communities in south-eastern Australia. A total of 116 sites were measured across a range of heathland, woodland and forest ecosystems. Flammability was measured using an ecological point based mechanistic fire behaviour model that estimates three measures of flammability relevant to both fire management and research. Predicted changes in flammability varied between vegetation types with heathland and wet forests generally increasing in flammability with time since fire and tall mixed, foothills and forby forests decreasing or showing limited changes with time since fire. Variations in flammability pathways suggest fire management activities that alter fuel structure, such as prescribed burning, may only reduce flammability in a limited set of ecosystems. Incorporating these results into a landscape analysis will improve the quantification of fire risk.
随着城市人口不断向易发生火灾的地区扩张,野火对人类的影响正在增加。只有了解和量化生态系统如何响应火灾而发生变化,以及这些变化如何影响可燃性,才能有效地进行火灾风险管理。然而,对此进行的研究有限,主要假设是最近燃烧的植被比旧植被的可燃性更低。为了更准确地量化可燃性的变化,我们首先需要量化单个植被群落对火灾的响应变化轨迹。其次,我们需要研究这些变化在多大程度上改变了可燃性。在这里,我们量化了澳大利亚东南部五个植被群落中,自火灾以来时间增加时的可燃性变化途径。在一系列石南荒原、林地和森林生态系统中,共测量了 116 个地点。使用基于生态点的机械火灾行为模型来测量可燃性,该模型估计了与火灾管理和研究都相关的三种可燃性度量。预测的可燃性变化在植被类型之间存在差异,随着时间的推移,石南荒原和湿地森林的可燃性通常会增加,而高大混合林、丘陵和森林则会减少或随着时间的推移变化有限。可燃性途径的变化表明,改变燃料结构的火灾管理活动,如计划燃烧,可能只会在有限的生态系统中降低可燃性。将这些结果纳入景观分析将提高火灾风险的量化水平。