Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Jan 2;378(1867):20210082. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0082. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
Wildfires have the potential to add considerably to the already significant challenge of achieving effective forest restoration in the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. While fire can sometimes promote forest restoration (e.g. by creating otherwise rare, early successional habitats), it can thwart it in others (e.g. by depleting key patch types and stand structures). Here we outline key considerations in facilitating restoration of some tall wet temperate forest ecosystems and some boreal forest ecosystems where the typical fire regime is rare high-severity stand-replacing fire. Some of these ecosystems are experiencing altered fire regimes such as increased fire extent, severity and/or frequency. Achieving good restoration outcomes in such ecosystems demands understanding fire regimes and their impacts on vegetation and other elements of biodiversity and then selecting ecosystem-appropriate management interventions. Potential actions range from doing nothing (as the ecosystem already maintains full post-fire regenerative capacity) to interventions prior to a conflagration like prescribed burning to limit the risks of high-severity fire, excluding activities that impair post-fire recovery (e.g. post-fire logging), and artificial seeding where natural regeneration fails. The most ecologically effective actions will be ecosystem-specific and context-specific and informed by knowledge of the ecosystem in question (such as plant life-history attributes) and inter-relationships with attributes like vegetation condition at the time it is burnt (e.g. young versus old forest). This article is part of the theme issue 'Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration'.
野火有可能极大地增加在联合国生态系统恢复十年中实现有效森林恢复的已经巨大的挑战。虽然火灾有时可以促进森林恢复(例如,通过创造其他罕见的早期演替生境),但在其他情况下也可能会破坏森林恢复(例如,通过耗尽关键斑块类型和林分结构)。在这里,我们概述了促进一些高湿温带森林生态系统和一些典型火灾为罕见的高强度林分取代火灾的北方森林生态系统恢复的关键考虑因素。这些生态系统中的一些正在经历改变的火灾模式,例如火灾范围、严重程度和/或频率增加。要在这些生态系统中实现良好的恢复结果,需要了解火灾模式及其对植被和生物多样性其他要素的影响,然后选择适合生态系统的管理干预措施。潜在的行动范围从什么都不做(因为生态系统已经保持了充分的火灾后再生能力)到在大火前进行计划火烧等干预措施,以限制高强度火灾的风险,排除会损害火灾后恢复的活动(例如火灾后采伐),以及在自然再生失败的情况下进行人工播种。最具生态有效性的行动将是针对特定生态系统和具体情况的,并以对相关生态系统的了解为依据(例如植物生活史特征),以及与燃烧时植被状况等属性的相互关系(例如年轻森林与老森林)。本文是主题为“理解森林景观恢复:为联合国生态系统恢复十年提供科学基础”的一部分。