Neimanis Aleksija S, Ahola Harri, Larsson Pettersson Ulrika, Lopes Ana M, Abrantes Joana, Zohari Siamak, Esteves Pedro J, Gavier-Widén Dolores
Department of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7028, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
BMC Vet Res. 2018 Nov 26;14(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1694-7.
Prior to 2010, the lagoviruses that cause rabbit hemorrhagic disease (RHD) in European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and European brown hare syndrome (EBHS) in hares (Lepus spp.) were generally genus-specific. However, in 2010, rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2), also known as Lagovirus europaeus GI.2, emerged and had the distinguishing ability to cause disease in both rabbits and certain hare species. The mountain hare (Lepus timidus) is native to Sweden and is susceptible to European brown hare syndrome virus (EBHSV), also called Lagovirus europaeus GII.1. While most mountain hare populations are found on the mainland, isolated populations also exist on islands. Here we investigate a mortality event in mountain hares on the small island of Hallands Väderö where other leporid species, including rabbits, are absent.
Post-mortem and microscopic examination of three mountain hare carcasses collected from early November 2016 to mid-March 2017 revealed acute hepatic necrosis consistent with pathogenic lagovirus infection. Using immunohistochemistry, lagoviral capsid antigen was visualized within lesions, both in hepatocytes and macrophages. Genotyping and immunotyping of the virus independently confirmed infection with L. europaeus GI.2, not GII.1. Phylogenetic analyses of the vp60 gene grouped mountain hare strains together with a rabbit strain from an outbreak of GI.2 in July 2016, collected approximately 50 km away on the mainland.
This is the first documented infection of GI.2 in mountain hares and further expands the host range of GI.2. Lesions and tissue distribution mimic those of GII.1 in mountain hares. The virus was most likely initially introduced from a concurrent, large-scale GI.2 outbreak in rabbits on the adjacent mainland, providing another example of how readily this virus can spread. The mortality event in mountain hares lasted for at least 4.5 months in the absence of rabbits, which would have required virus circulation among mountain hares, environmental persistence and/or multiple introductions. This marks the fourth Lepus species that can succumb to GI.2 infection, suggesting that susceptibility to GI.2 may be common in Lepus species. Measures to minimize the spread of GI.2 to vulnerable Lepus populations therefore are prudent.
2010年之前,在欧洲兔(穴兔)中引起兔出血性疾病(RHD)以及在野兔(兔属)中引起欧洲棕兔综合征(EBHS)的兔瘟病毒通常具有属特异性。然而,2010年,兔出血性疾病病毒2(RHDV2),也称为欧洲兔瘟病毒GI.2出现了,它具有在兔和某些野兔物种中引发疾病的独特能力。山兔(Lepus timidus)原产于瑞典,易感染欧洲棕兔综合征病毒(EBHSV),也称为欧洲兔瘟病毒GII.1。虽然大多数山兔种群分布在大陆,但岛屿上也存在孤立的种群。在此,我们调查了哈兰德斯韦德罗小岛上山兔的一次死亡事件,该岛没有包括兔在内的其他兔科物种。
对2016年11月初至2017年3月中旬收集的三只山兔尸体进行的尸检和显微镜检查显示,存在与致病性兔瘟病毒感染一致的急性肝坏死。使用免疫组织化学方法,在病变部位的肝细胞和巨噬细胞中均可见到兔瘟病毒衣壳抗原。对病毒进行基因分型和免疫分型独立证实感染的是欧洲兔瘟病毒GI.2,而非GII.1。对vp60基因的系统发育分析将山兔毒株与2016年7月在约50公里外大陆上爆发的GI.2疫情中的一株兔毒株归为一组。
这是首次有记录的山兔感染GI.2,进一步扩大了GI.2的宿主范围。病变和组织分布与山兔感染GII.1的情况相似。该病毒很可能最初是从相邻大陆上同时发生的大规模兔GI.2疫情传入的,这再次证明了这种病毒传播的容易程度。在没有兔的情况下,山兔的死亡事件持续了至少4.5个月,这需要病毒在山兔之间循环、在环境中持续存在和/或多次传入。这标志着第四个会死于GI.2感染的兔属物种,表明兔属物种对GI.2的易感性可能很普遍。因此,采取措施尽量减少GI.2向易受影响的兔属种群传播是谨慎的做法。