Packer Jonathan D, Cowan James B, Rebolledo Brian J, Shibata Kotaro R, Riley Geoffrey M, Finlay Andrea K, Safran Marc R
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Nov 12;6(11):2325967118807176. doi: 10.1177/2325967118807176. eCollection 2018 Nov.
The preoperative diagnosis of hip microinstability is challenging. Although physical examination maneuvers and magnetic resonance imaging findings associated with microinstability have been described, there are limited reports of radiographic features. In patients with microinstability, we observed a high incidence of a steep drop-off on the lateral edge of the femoral head, which we have named the "cliff sign."
(1) To determine the relationship of the cliff sign and associated measurements with intraoperative microinstability and (2) to determine the interobserver reliability of these measurements.
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
A total of 115 consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroscopy were identified. Patients with prior hip surgery, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, fractures, pigmented villonodular synovitis, or synovial chondromatosis were excluded, resulting in the inclusion of 96 patients in the study. A perfect circle around the femoral head was created on anteroposterior pelvis radiographs. If the lateral femoral head did not completely fill the perfect circle, it was considered a positive cliff sign. Five additional measurements relating to the cliff sign were calculated. The diagnosis of microinstability was made intraoperatively by the (1) amount of traction required to distract the hip, (2) lack of hip reduction after initial traction release following joint venting, or (3) intraoperative findings consistent with hip microinstability. Continuous variables were analyzed through use of unpaired tests and discrete variables with Fisher exact tests. Interobserver reliability (n = 3) was determined for each measurement.
Overall, 89% (39/44) of patients with microinstability had a cliff sign, compared with 27% of patients (14/52) without instability ( < .0001). Conversely, 74% of patients with a cliff sign had microinstability, while only 12% of patients without a cliff sign had instability ( < .0001). In women younger than 32 years with a cliff sign, 100% (20/20) were diagnosed with instability. No differences were found in any of the 5 additional measurements. Excellent interobserver reliability was found for the presence of a cliff sign and the cliff angle measurement.
We have identified a radiographic finding, the cliff sign, that is associated with the intraoperative diagnosis of hip microinstability and has excellent interobserver reliability. Results showed that 100% of young women with a cliff sign had intraoperative microinstability. The cliff sign may be useful in the preoperative diagnosis of hip microinstability.
髋关节微不稳定的术前诊断具有挑战性。尽管已经描述了与微不稳定相关的体格检查手法和磁共振成像表现,但关于放射学特征的报道有限。在微不稳定患者中,我们观察到股骨头外侧边缘出现陡坡状下降的发生率很高,我们将其命名为“悬崖征”。
(1)确定悬崖征及相关测量值与术中微不稳定的关系;(2)确定这些测量值在观察者间的可靠性。
队列研究(诊断);证据等级,2级。
共纳入115例连续接受髋关节镜检查的患者。排除既往有髋关节手术史、Legg-Calvé-Perthes病、骨折、色素沉着绒毛结节性滑膜炎或滑膜软骨瘤病的患者,最终96例患者纳入本研究。在骨盆前后位X线片上围绕股骨头绘制一个完美的圆。如果股骨头外侧未完全填满这个完美的圆,则认为悬崖征阳性。计算与悬崖征相关的另外5项测量值。术中通过以下方法诊断微不稳定:(1)使髋关节牵开所需的牵引力大小;(2)关节排气后最初松开牵引后髋关节未复位;或(3)术中发现与髋关节微不稳定一致。连续变量通过使用非配对t检验进行分析,离散变量通过Fisher精确检验进行分析。确定了每项测量值在观察者间的可靠性(n = 3)。
总体而言,微不稳定患者中有89%(39/44)出现悬崖征,而无不稳定的患者中这一比例为27%(14/52)(P <.0001)。相反,有悬崖征的患者中有74%存在微不稳定,而无悬崖征的患者中只有12%存在不稳定(P <.0001)。在32岁以下有悬崖征的女性中,100%(20/20)被诊断为不稳定。在另外5项测量值中未发现差异。对于悬崖征的存在和悬崖角测量,观察者间可靠性极佳。
我们发现了一种放射学表现,即悬崖征,它与髋关节微不稳定的术中诊断相关,且观察者间可靠性极佳。结果显示,有悬崖征的年轻女性中有100%存在术中微不稳定。悬崖征可能有助于髋关节微不稳定的术前诊断。