Pomara Nunzio, Bruno Davide
Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2018 Oct 3;2(1):165-167. doi: 10.3233/ADR-180077.
In spite of compelling evidence linking amyloid-β (Aβ) disturbances to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD), Aβ-based treatments have consistently failed to produce any beneficial effects both in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD, even with successful reductions of toxic aggregated and soluble Aβ species. Before abandoning both the hypothesis and approach, there is a need to examine some overlooked factors that may have contributed to the lack of efficacy, such as the potential drug-induced increases in neuronal hyperactivity leading to adverse cognitive effects. In particular, we posit that selective cholinergic and noradrenergic pathways will be especially vulnerable to this adverse effect. If confirmed, this idea could help identify a potentially preventable and treatable obstacle for enhancing the efficacy of therapeutic agents in MCI and AD.
尽管有确凿证据表明β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)紊乱与阿尔茨海默病(AD)的病理生理学相关,但基于Aβ的治疗方法在轻度认知障碍(MCI)和AD中始终未能产生任何有益效果,即便成功减少了有毒的聚集性和可溶性Aβ种类。在放弃这一假说和方法之前,有必要审视一些可能导致疗效不佳而被忽视的因素,比如药物可能引发的神经元活动亢进进而导致不良认知效应。特别是,我们认为选择性胆碱能和去甲肾上腺素能通路将尤其易受这种不良效应的影响。如果得到证实,这一观点可能有助于识别一个潜在可预防和可治疗的障碍,以提高治疗药物在MCI和AD中的疗效。