Primary Pharmacology Group , Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development , Groton , Connecticut 06340 , United States.
ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019 Mar 20;10(3):1753-1764. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00625. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
Preclinical and clinical data suggest that muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation may be therapeutically beneficial for the treatment of schizophrenia and Alzheimer's diseases. This is best exemplified by clinical observations with xanomeline, the efficacy of which is thought to be mediated through co-activation of the M1 and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). Here we examined the impact of treatment with xanomeline and compared it to the actions of selective M1 and M4 mAChR activators on in vivo intracellular signaling cascades in mice, including 3'-5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation and inositol phosphate-1 (IP1) accumulation in the striatum, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex. We additionally assessed the effects of xanomeline on hippocampal electrophysiological signatures in rats using ex vivo recordings from CA1 (Cornu Ammonis 1) as well as in vivo hippocampal theta. As expected, xanomeline's effects across these readouts were consistent with activation of both M1 and M4 mAChRs; however, differences were observed across different brain regions, suggesting non-uniform activation of these receptor subtypes in the central nervous system. Interestingly, despite having nearly equal in vitro potency at the M1 and the M4 mAChRs, during in vivo assays xanomeline produced M4-like effects at significantly lower brain exposures than those at which M1-like effects were observed. Our results raise the possibility that clinical efficacy observed with xanomeline was driven, in part, through its non-uniform activation of mAChR subtypes in the central nervous system and, at lower doses, through preferential agonism of the M4 mAChR.
临床前和临床数据表明,毒蕈碱乙酰胆碱受体激活可能对治疗精神分裂症和阿尔茨海默病具有治疗益处。这一点在 xanomeline 的临床观察中得到了最好的证明,其疗效被认为是通过 M1 和 M4 毒蕈碱乙酰胆碱受体 (mAChR) 的共同激活介导的。在这里,我们研究了 xanomeline 治疗的影响,并将其与选择性 M1 和 M4 mAChR 激动剂对体内细胞内信号级联的作用进行了比较,包括 3'-5'-环磷酸腺苷反应元件结合蛋白 (CREB) 磷酸化和纹状体、海马和前额叶皮质中的肌醇 1 (IP1) 积累。我们还通过从 CA1(Cornu Ammonis 1)进行离体记录以及体内海马θ来评估 xanomeline 对大鼠海马电生理特征的影响。正如预期的那样,xanomeline 在这些读数上的作用与其对 M1 和 M4 mAChR 的激活一致;然而,在不同的大脑区域观察到差异,表明这些受体亚型在中枢神经系统中的激活不均匀。有趣的是,尽管 xanomeline 在体外对 M1 和 M4 mAChR 的效力几乎相同,但在体内试验中,xanomeline 产生 M4 样作用的脑暴露水平明显低于观察到 M1 样作用的水平。我们的结果提出了一种可能性,即 xanomeline 在临床上观察到的疗效部分是由于其在中枢神经系统中对 mAChR 亚型的不均匀激活,并且在较低剂量下通过对 M4 mAChR 的优先激动作用驱动的。