• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢克肟与阿莫西林治疗成年患者急性尿路感染安全性和有效性的双盲、多中心对照研究

A double-blind, multicenter, comparative study of the safety and efficacy of cefixime versus amoxicillin in the treatment of acute urinary tract infections in adult patients.

作者信息

Iravani A, Richard G A, Johnson D, Bryant A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1988 Sep 16;85(3A):17-23. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90459-7.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(88)90459-7
PMID:3048090
Abstract

In this 31-site multicenter trial, 565 adult patients with urinary tract infections were randomly assigned to receive either a 10-day course of cefixime 400 mg once daily (n = 279) or amoxicillin 250 mg three times daily (n = 286). Although all patients were included in the safety analysis, only 93 (33 percent) cefixime-treated and 99 (35 percent) amoxicillin-treated patients were fully evaluable for the efficacy analysis. One week after therapy, the evaluable patients treated with cefixime demonstrated a 90 percent clinical cure rate and a 92 percent eradication rate of the baseline pathogen. This compared with an 83 percent clinical cure rate and an 84 percent bacterial eradication rate in the amoxicillin-treated group. The most frequently isolated pathogen was Escherichia coli (80 percent) followed by Proteus mirabilis (10 percent). One hundred thirty-seven (49 percent) of the 279 cefixime-treated and 126 (44 percent) of the 286 amoxicillin-treated patients reported at least one adverse experience during the study. Adverse reactions associated with cefixime were similar to those reported for other beta-lactam antibiotics. The most frequent adverse experiences reported by cefixime-treated patients were diarrhea (15 percent) and stool changes (12 percent). Headaches (11 percent) and diarrhea (9 percent) were the most frequently reported adverse reactions by the amoxicillin-treated patients. Eleven cefixime-treated patients (3.9 percent) and 10 amoxicillin-treated patients (3.5 percent) discontinued therapy because of adverse experiences. Results of this study demonstrate that a once-daily regimen of cefixime is as safe and effective as a three-times-daily regimen of amoxicillin in the treatment of acute urinary tract infections. Although the incidence of bowel changes was somewhat higher in the cefixime treatment group, these events usually resolved when therapy was discontinued.

摘要

在这项有31个研究点的多中心试验中,565例成年尿路感染患者被随机分配,分别接受为期10天的每日一次400毫克头孢克肟治疗(n = 279)或每日三次250毫克阿莫西林治疗(n = 286)。尽管所有患者都纳入了安全性分析,但只有93例(33%)接受头孢克肟治疗的患者和99例(35%)接受阿莫西林治疗的患者可完全用于疗效分析。治疗一周后,接受头孢克肟治疗的可评估患者临床治愈率为90%,基线病原体根除率为92%。相比之下,阿莫西林治疗组的临床治愈率为83%,细菌根除率为84%。最常分离出的病原体是大肠埃希菌(80%),其次是奇异变形杆菌(10%)。279例接受头孢克肟治疗的患者中有137例(49%),286例接受阿莫西林治疗的患者中有126例(44%)在研究期间报告了至少一次不良事件。与头孢克肟相关的不良反应与其他β-内酰胺类抗生素报告的不良反应相似。接受头孢克肟治疗的患者报告的最常见不良事件是腹泻(15%)和大便改变(12%)。接受阿莫西林治疗的患者报告的最常见不良反应是头痛(11%)和腹泻(9%)。11例接受头孢克肟治疗的患者(3.9%)和10例接受阿莫西林治疗的患者(3.5%)因不良事件而停药。本研究结果表明,在治疗急性尿路感染方面,每日一次的头孢克肟治疗方案与每日三次的阿莫西林治疗方案一样安全有效。尽管头孢克肟治疗组肠道改变的发生率略高,但这些事件在停药后通常会缓解。

相似文献

1
A double-blind, multicenter, comparative study of the safety and efficacy of cefixime versus amoxicillin in the treatment of acute urinary tract infections in adult patients.头孢克肟与阿莫西林治疗成年患者急性尿路感染安全性和有效性的双盲、多中心对照研究
Am J Med. 1988 Sep 16;85(3A):17-23. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90459-7.
2
Comparative, multicenter studies of cefixime and amoxicillin in the treatment of respiratory tract infections.头孢克肟与阿莫西林治疗呼吸道感染的对比性多中心研究。
Am J Med. 1988 Sep 16;85(3A):6-13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90457-3.
3
Randomized, open label, multicenter trial of cefixime compared with amoxicillin for treatment of acute otitis media with effusion.头孢克肟与阿莫西林治疗急性分泌性中耳炎的随机、开放标签、多中心试验
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987 Oct;6(10):997-1001. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198710000-00042.
4
[Controlled multicentric study comparing cefixime and amoxicillin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in adults].[比较头孢克肟和阿莫西林治疗成人下呼吸道感染的对照多中心研究]
Presse Med. 1989 Oct 11;18(32):1600-4.
5
Cefixime versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in lower respiratory tract infections.头孢克肟与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗下呼吸道感染的对比
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1989 Jan;27(1):30-3.
6
Comparison of cefixime and co-trimoxazole in acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection. A double-blind general practice study.头孢克肟与复方新诺明治疗急性单纯性尿路感染的比较。一项双盲全科医学研究。
S Afr Med J. 1986 Oct 11;70(8):455-60.
7
[Comparative study of intravenous ceftriaxone followed by oral cefixime versus ceftriaxone alone in the treatment of severe upper urinary tract infections].静脉注射头孢曲松后口服头孢克肟与单纯使用头孢曲松治疗严重上尿路感染的对比研究
Presse Med. 1989 Oct 11;18(32):1617-21.
8
Cefixime versus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in treatment of patients with acute, uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections.头孢克肟与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑治疗急性单纯性下尿路感染患者的疗效比较
Urology. 1989 Nov;34(5):322-6. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(89)90335-x.
9
Efficacy and safety of clarithromycin compared to cefixime as outpatient treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.克拉霉素与头孢克肟作为门诊治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效及安全性比较。
Chest. 1993 Nov;104(5):1393-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.5.1393.
10
[Comparative study of cefixime versus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid combination in the oral treatment of urinary tract infections in children].头孢克肟与阿莫西林-克拉维酸联合用药口服治疗儿童尿路感染的对比研究
Arch Pediatr. 1995 Feb;2(2):136-42. doi: 10.1016/0929-693x(96)89873-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of cephalosporins.头孢菌素类药物的药理学、药代动力学及临床应用综述。
Tex Heart Inst J. 1990;17(3):203-15.
2
Cost-effectiveness and value of an IV switch.静脉输液转换装置的成本效益和价值
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994;5(Suppl 2):20-6. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199400052-00005.
3
Adverse effects of newer cephalosporins. An update.新型头孢菌素的不良反应。最新进展。
Drug Saf. 1993 Aug;9(2):132-42. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199309020-00005.
4
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Does it increase susceptibility to adverse drug reactions?人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染。它是否会增加药物不良反应的易感性?
Drug Saf. 1993 Jul;9(1):1-8. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199309010-00001.
5
Ceftibuten pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Focus on paediatric use.头孢布烯的药代动力学和药效学。重点关注儿科应用。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994 Mar;26(3):169-89. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199426030-00002.
6
Cefixime. A review of its antibacterial activity. Pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.头孢克肟。其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗潜力综述。
Drugs. 1989 Oct;38(4):524-50. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198938040-00004.
7
[Effectiveness and tolerance of cefixime in the treatment of acute pyelonephritis].头孢克肟治疗急性肾盂肾炎的有效性及耐受性
Infection. 1990;18 Suppl 3:S140-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01644633.
8
[Cefixime in urinary tract infections. (Specific studies and literature review)].[头孢克肟在尿路感染中的应用。(专项研究与文献综述)]
Infection. 1990;18 Suppl 3:S132-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01644632.
9
Loracarbef versus cefaclor in the treatment of urinary tract infections in women.氯碳头孢与头孢克洛治疗女性尿路感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Apr;35(4):750-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.4.750.
10
Treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection with ceftibuten.用头孢布烯治疗急性单纯性尿路感染。
Infection. 1991 Mar-Apr;19(2):124-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01645584.