Department of Pharmacy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5 place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France; Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, EA 4129 P2S Parcours Santé Systémique, 7-11 rue Guilllaume Paradin, 69008 Lyon, France.
Department of Pharmacy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5 place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France.
Eur J Intern Med. 2019 Jan;59:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
Pharmacists contribute to reduce the number of medication errors during medication review. Nevertheless, few French studies report the potential clinical impact of pharmacists' interventions performed after detecting drug-related problems. The objective was to evaluate the clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions in a rheumatology ward from medical and pharmaceutical perspectives.
The analysis was conducted on pharmacists' interventions performed between January 1 and December 31, 2015 in a French teaching hospital. Similar pharmacists' interventions were grouped in one item and they were analysed according to 11 drug categories. The clinical significance of pharmacists' interventions was considered independently by a pharmacist and a rheumatologist using a validated French scale that categorises drug-related problems from minor to catastrophic. The agreement between the two professionals was analysed using the weighted kappa coefficient.
Of 1313 prescriptions reviewed, 461 pharmacists' interventions (171 items) were formulated for drug-related problems with an acceptance rate of 67.2%. Of the 418 interventions selected for clinical significance analysis, 235 interventions (56.2%) for the physician and 400 interventions (95.7%) for the pharmacist were at least significant. The two professionals evaluated equally the clinical relevance of 90 items (50.6%). The categories with the most similarities were the analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs (78.1%), the antidiabetics (75.0%) and the anticoagulants (71.4%). The agreement was estimated by a weighted kappa coefficient of 0.29.
This work highlights the positive clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions in rheumatology and the importance of medico-pharmaceutical collaboration to prevent medication errors.
药剂师在药物审查过程中有助于减少用药错误的数量。然而,很少有法国研究报告药剂师在发现药物相关问题后进行干预的潜在临床影响。本研究旨在从医学和药学角度评估风湿科病房药剂师干预的临床相关性。
对 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间在法国教学医院进行的药剂师干预进行了分析。对类似的药剂师干预进行了分组,并根据 11 种药物类别进行了分析。药剂师和风湿病学家使用经过验证的法国量表(该量表将药物相关问题分为轻微至灾难性)独立评估药剂师干预的临床意义。使用加权 kappa 系数分析两位专业人员之间的一致性。
在审查的 1313 份处方中,共提出了 461 项与药物相关的问题的药剂师干预(171 项),接受率为 67.2%。在选择进行临床意义分析的 418 项干预措施中,235 项干预措施(56.2%)对医生和 400 项干预措施(95.7%)对药剂师至少是显著的。两位专业人员对 90 项干预措施(50.6%)的临床相关性评估相同。相似度最高的类别是镇痛药/抗炎药(78.1%)、抗糖尿病药(75.0%)和抗凝剂(71.4%)。加权 kappa 系数估计的一致性为 0.29。
这项工作强调了药剂师在风湿病学中的积极临床相关性,以及医-药合作在预防用药错误方面的重要性。