Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Feb;42(1):141-149. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-00970-0. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
Background The physicians' acceptance rate of pharmacists' interventions to improve pharmacotherapy can vary depending on the setting. The acceptance rate of interventions proposed by pharmacists located in the hospital pharmacy over the telephone and factors associated with acceptance are largely unknown. Objective To determine the physicians' acceptance rate of pharmacists' interventions proposed over the telephone in daily hospital practice and to identify factors associated with acceptance. Setting A retrospective case-control study was performed concerning adult patients admitted to a university hospital in the Netherlands. Method Pharmacists' interventions, based on alerts for drug-drug interactions and drug dosing in patients with renal impairment, recorded between January 2012 and June 2013 that were communicated over the telephone were included. Factors associated with physicians' acceptance were identified with the use of a mixed-effects logistic model. Main outcome measure The primary outcome was the proportion of accepted interventions. Results A total of 841 interventions were included. Physicians accepted 599 interventions, resulting in an acceptance rate of 71.2%. The mixed-effects logistic model showed that acceptance was significantly associated with the number of prescribed drugs (16 to ≤ 20 drugs OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.05-3.35, > 20 drugs OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.41-5.96, compared to ≤ 10 drugs) and the severity of the drug-related problem (problem without potential harm OR 6.36; 95% CI 1.89-21.38; problem with potential harm OR 6.78; 95% CI 2.09-21.99, compared to clinically irrelevant problems), and inversely associated with continuation of pre-admission treatment (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.87). Conclusion Over the study period, the majority of pharmacists' interventions proposed over the telephone were accepted by physicians. The probability for acceptance increased for patients with an increasing number of medication orders, for clinically relevant problems and for problems related to treatment initiated during admission.
医生对药剂师干预以改善药物治疗的接受率可能因环境而异。药剂师通过电话提出的干预措施的接受率以及与接受率相关的因素在很大程度上是未知的。目的:确定药师在日常医院实践中通过电话提出的干预措施的医生接受率,并确定与接受率相关的因素。设置:进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,涉及荷兰一所大学医院的成年患者。方法:纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2013 年 6 月期间记录的基于药物相互作用和肾功能损害患者药物剂量调整的电话沟通的药师干预措施。使用混合效应逻辑模型确定与医生接受相关的因素。主要结果:共纳入 841 项干预措施。医生接受了 599 项干预措施,接受率为 71.2%。混合效应逻辑模型显示,接受与开处方药物数量(16 至≤20 种药物 OR 1.88;95%CI 1.05-3.35,>20 种药物 OR 2.90;95%CI 1.41-5.96,与≤10 种药物相比)和药物相关问题的严重程度(无潜在危害的问题 OR 6.36;95%CI 1.89-21.38;有潜在危害的问题 OR 6.78;95%CI 2.09-21.99,与临床无关的问题相比)显著相关,与入院前治疗的持续时间呈负相关(OR 0.55;95%CI 0.35-0.87)。结论:在研究期间,大多数药师通过电话提出的干预措施得到了医生的接受。接受的可能性随着药物订单数量的增加、与临床相关的问题以及与入院期间开始的治疗相关的问题而增加。