Yoong Deborah, Bayoumi Ahmed M, Robinson Linda, Rachlis Beth, Antoniou Tony
Department of Pharmacy (Yoong), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Bayoumi), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Bayoumi), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Pharmacy (Robinson), Windsor Regional Hospital, Windsor, Ont.; Ontario HIV Treatment Network (Rachlis), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Antoniou), St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Antoniou), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ Open. 2018 Nov 27;6(4):E551-E560. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180058. Print 2018 Oct-Dec.
BACKGROUND: Antiretrovirals are expensive and people living with HIV may experience a range of financial burdens when accessing these medications. Our aim was to describe the policy of all Canadian public drug insurance programs for antiretroviral drugs and illustrated how these policies might affect patients' annual out-of-pocket expenditures. METHODS: In December 2017, we reviewed public drug programs offering antiretroviral coverage in Canada using government websites to summarize eligibility criteria. We estimated the annual out-of-pocket costs incurred by people living with HIV by applying the cost-sharing rules to 2 hypothetical cases, a single man and a married woman with a net household income of $39 000 and $80 000, respectively, receiving identical prescriptions in different jurisdictions. RESULTS: We observed substantial variation in the subsidy provided based mainly on geography, income and age. All 5 federal programs and 6 of 13 provincial and territorial jurisdictions offered universal coverage. In the remaining regions, patients spend up to several thousand dollars annually depending on income (Manitoba), age and income (Ontario, Saskatchewan) and age, income and drug costs (Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador). We found the greatest variation for our higher income case, with out-of-pocket expenses ranging from 0 to over 50% of the antiretroviral cost. INTERPRETATION: There is considerable inter- and intra-jurisdiction heterogeneity in the cost-sharing policies for antiretrovirals across Canada's public drug programs. Policy reforms that either eliminate or set national standards for copayments, deductibles or premiums would minimize variation and could reduce the risk of cost-associated non-adherence to HIV therapy.
背景:抗逆转录病毒药物价格昂贵,感染艾滋病毒的人在获取这些药物时可能会面临一系列经济负担。我们的目的是描述加拿大所有公共药物保险计划对抗逆转录病毒药物的政策,并说明这些政策可能如何影响患者的年度自付费用。 方法:2017年12月,我们通过政府网站审查了加拿大提供抗逆转录病毒药物覆盖的公共药物计划,以总结资格标准。我们通过将费用分摊规则应用于两个假设案例来估计艾滋病毒感染者的年度自付费用,这两个案例分别是一名单身男子和一名已婚妇女,家庭净收入分别为39000加元和80000加元,在不同司法管辖区接受相同的处方。 结果:我们观察到补贴存在很大差异,主要基于地理位置、收入和年龄。所有5个联邦计划以及13个省和地区司法管辖区中的6个提供了全民覆盖。在其余地区患者每年根据收入(马尼托巴省)、年龄和收入(安大略省、萨斯喀彻温省)以及年龄、收入和药物成本(魁北克省、纽芬兰和拉布拉多省)花费高达数千加元。我们发现高收入案例的差异最大,自付费用占抗逆转录病毒药物成本的比例从0到超过50%不等。 解读:加拿大公共药物计划中抗逆转录病毒药物的费用分摊政策在司法管辖区之间和内部存在相当大的异质性。消除或设定共付额、免赔额或保费国家标准的政策改革将使差异最小化,并可降低与成本相关的艾滋病毒治疗不依从风险。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020-8-28
N Engl J Med. 2016-9-1
N Engl J Med. 2015-8-27