Department of Anesthesiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Feb;66(2):201-217. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1255-3. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
An increasing number of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) are treated with opioid agonist-antagonists such as buprenorphine/naloxone. Perioperative management of patients on buprenorphine/naloxone is inconsistent and remains a controversial topic with mismanagement posing a significant risk to the long-term health of these patients.
We performed a systematic literature search involving Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, Web of Science (Clarivate), Scopus (Elsevier), CINAHL (EbscoHosst), and PubMed (NLM).
Eighteen studies were included in the final sample, including one controlled study and four observational studies . Neither the controlled study nor the observational studies assessed addiction treatment retention, harm reduction, or long-term mortality rates as primary or secondary outcomes. Of the observational studies, authors showed equivalent peri- and postoperative pain control among buprenorphine continued patients. All but one authors described adequate analgesia among the case reports in which buprenorphine ≤ 16 mg sublingually (SL) daily was continued during the perioperative period. Long-term harm reduction was not reported with only three case reports including any long-term abstinence or relapse rates.
The current understanding of the risks and benefits of continuing or stopping buprenorphine perioperatively is limited by a lack of high-quality evidence. Observational studies and case reports indicate no evidence against continuing buprenorphine perioperatively, especially when the dose is < 16 mg SL daily. In patients with significant potential for relapse, such as those with a recent history of OUD, the discontinuation of buprenorphine should have a strong rationale supported by patient and surgical preferences. Future studies require standardized reporting of median doses, details on the route of delivery, dosing schedules and any dosing changes, and rates of addiction relapse, including long-term morbidity and mortality where possible.
越来越多的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者接受阿片类激动剂拮抗剂治疗,如丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮。接受丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗的患者的围手术期管理不一致,仍然是一个有争议的话题,如果管理不当,会对这些患者的长期健康构成重大风险。
我们进行了一项系统文献检索,涉及 Medline、Medline In-Process、Embase、Cochrane Central、Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews、PsycINFO、Web of Science(Clarivate)、Scopus(Elsevier)、CINAHL(EbscoHosst)和 PubMed(NLM)。
最终样本中包括 18 项研究,其中包括一项对照研究和四项观察性研究。对照研究和观察性研究均未将成瘾治疗保留率、减少伤害或长期死亡率评估为主要或次要结局。在观察性研究中,作者发现继续使用丁丙诺啡的患者在围手术期有相同的围手术期和术后疼痛控制效果。除了一项研究外,所有作者都描述了在丁丙诺啡舌下(SL)每天剂量≤16 毫克的病例报告中,围手术期的镇痛效果是足够的。只有三项病例报告报告了长期减少伤害,其中包括任何长期戒断或复发率。
目前对继续或停止围手术期使用丁丙诺啡的风险和益处的理解受到缺乏高质量证据的限制。观察性研究和病例报告表明,继续围手术期使用丁丙诺啡没有任何证据,特别是当剂量<16 毫克 SL 每天时。在有明显复发风险的患者中,如近期有阿片类药物使用障碍史的患者,应根据患者和手术偏好,有充分的理由停止使用丁丙诺啡。未来的研究需要标准化报告中位数剂量、给药途径的详细信息、剂量方案和任何剂量变化,以及成瘾复发率,包括可能的长期发病率和死亡率。