Department of Anaesthesia, University of Toronto, Canada; T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, USA.
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Anaesthesia, Queen's University School of Medicine, Canada.
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e333-e342. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.044. Epub 2019 May 29.
Until recently, the belief that adequate pain management was not achievable while patients remained on buprenorphine was the impetus for the perioperative discontinuation of buprenorphine. We aimed to use an expert consensus Delphi-based survey technique to 1) specify the need for perioperative guidelines in this context and 2) offer a set of recommendations for the perioperative management of these patients. The major recommendation of this practice advisory is to continue buprenorphine therapy in the perioperative period. It is rarely appropriate to reduce the buprenorphine dose irrespective of indication or formulation. If analgesia is inadequate after optimisation of adjunct analgesic therapies, we recommend initiating a full mu agonist while continuing buprenorphine at some dose. The panel believes that before operation, physicians must distinguish between buprenorphine use for chronic pain (weaning/conversion from long-term high-dose opioids) and opioid use disorder (OUD) as the primary indication for buprenorphine therapy. Patients should ideally be discharged on buprenorphine, although not necessarily at their preoperative dose. Depending on analgesic requirements, they may be discharged on a full mu agonist. Overall, long-term buprenorphine treatment retention and harm reduction must be considered during the perioperative period when OUD is a primary diagnosis. The authors recognise that inter-patient variability will require some individualisation of clinical practice advisories. Clinical practice advisories are largely based on lower classes of evidence (level 4, level 5). Further research is required in order to implement meaningful changes in practitioner behaviour for this patient group.
直到最近,人们还认为,只要患者仍在使用丁丙诺啡,就无法实现充分的疼痛管理,这是停止围手术期丁丙诺啡治疗的动力。我们旨在使用基于专家共识 Delphi 调查技术:1)明确在这种情况下围手术期指南的需求;2)为这些患者的围手术期管理提供一套建议。本实践建议的主要建议是在围手术期继续使用丁丙诺啡治疗。无论指示或制剂如何,减少丁丙诺啡剂量通常都不合适。如果在优化辅助镇痛治疗后镇痛不足,我们建议在继续使用一些剂量的丁丙诺啡的同时,开始使用全阿片激动剂。专家组认为,在手术前,医生必须区分丁丙诺啡用于慢性疼痛(从长期高剂量阿片类药物逐渐减少/转换)和阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)作为丁丙诺啡治疗的主要指征。患者理想情况下应服用丁丙诺啡出院,尽管不一定是术前剂量。根据镇痛需求,他们可能会出院服用全阿片激动剂。总体而言,当 OUD 是主要诊断时,必须在围手术期考虑长期丁丙诺啡治疗的保留和减少伤害。作者认识到,患者间的变异性将需要对临床实践建议进行一些个体化。临床实践建议主要基于较低级别的证据(4 级,5 级)。需要进一步研究,以便为这群患者实施对医生行为的有意义的改变。