Suppr超能文献

美国东南部阿拉巴马州的延迟折扣及其与食品购买考虑因素和家庭食品供应的关联。

Delay discounting and its association with food purchasing considerations and food availability in the home in south-east Alabama, USA.

机构信息

Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, 033 James E. Foy Hall, Auburn, AL36849, USA.

Auburn University College of Human Sciences, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Auburn, AL, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2019 Feb;22(2):287-294. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003142. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Certain factors, such as food quality, label content and grocery characteristics, may be considered when purchasing foods. Food availability in the home has been shown to influence dietary behaviours, also associated with delay discounting (DD). The present study sought to characterize the relationships between DD, food purchasing considerations and healthfulness of foods in the home.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional, online survey of adults (n 477) was conducted with the following measures: DD, consideration of food quality (nutrition, taste) and grocery characteristics (price, ease of preparation, shelf-life) while shopping, use of food labels and food availability in the home. DD was assessed by the area under the delay discounting curve (AUC) using a binary choice task. Greater AUC reflects lower DD. Structural equation modelling was used to allow AUC to simultaneously predict purchasing considerations and foods in the home.

SETTING

Online survey.ParticipantsAdult employees in south-east Alabama, USA.

RESULTS

DD was negatively associated with food label use and emphasis on food quality when shopping (P<0·001). In the final model, DD was associated with availability of healthful foods in the home and emphasis on food quality and grocery characteristics. About 33 % of the variance in shopping behaviours, 5 % in food label use, 7 % in availability of healthful foods and 4 % in availability of unhealthful foods was explained by DD.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with lower DD appear to be more thoughtful in making food purchasing decisions and have healthful foods available in the home more frequently than individuals with higher DD.

摘要

目的

在购买食品时,可能会考虑食品质量、标签内容和杂货店特征等因素。家庭中食物的可得性已被证明会影响饮食行为,这也与延迟折扣(DD)有关。本研究旨在描述 DD、购买食品时的考虑因素以及家庭中食品的健康程度之间的关系。

设计

对美国东南部的成年人(n 477)进行了横断面、在线调查,采用以下措施:DD、购物时对食品质量(营养、口味)和杂货店特征(价格、准备难易度、保质期)的考虑、食品标签的使用以及家庭中食品的可得性。DD 使用二元选择任务通过延迟折扣曲线下的面积(AUC)来评估。较大的 AUC 反映了较低的 DD。结构方程模型用于允许 AUC 同时预测购买考虑因素和家庭中的食品。

地点

在线调查。参与者:美国阿拉巴马州东南部的成年员工。

结果

DD 与购物时使用食品标签和强调食品质量呈负相关(P<0·001)。在最终模型中,DD 与家庭中健康食品的可得性以及对食品质量和杂货店特征的重视有关。购物行为的 33%、食品标签使用的 5%、健康食品的 7%和不健康食品的 4%的方差可由 DD 来解释。

结论

DD 较低的个体在做出购买食品的决策时似乎更有想法,并且家庭中更经常有健康的食品。

相似文献

1
Delay discounting and its association with food purchasing considerations and food availability in the home in south-east Alabama, USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Feb;22(2):287-294. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003142. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
3
Qualitative Research on the Real-Time Decision Making of WIC Participants While Food Shopping: Use of Think-Aloud Methodology.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Jan;120(1):111-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
4
Delay discounting and household food purchasing decisions: The SHoPPER study.
Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;38(4):334-342. doi: 10.1037/hea0000727.
5
Measuring the healthfulness of food retail stores: variations by store type and neighbourhood deprivation.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 May 23;11:69. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-69.
6
' - Australian shoppers' experiences with online grocery platforms.
Public Health Nutr. 2024 May 14;27(1):e134. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001046.
9
Attitude and Behavior Factors Associated with Front-of-Package Label Use with Label Users Making Accurate Product Nutrition Assessments.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 May;118(5):904-912. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
10
Impulsivity and Fast-Food Consumption: A Cross-Sectional Study among Working Adults.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Jan;116(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Nutrition Facts Panels: Who Uses Them, What Do They Use, and How Does Use Relate to Dietary Intake?
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Feb;118(2):217-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.014.
3
Impact of explained v. unexplained front-of-package nutrition labels on parent and child food choices: a randomized trial.
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Apr;20(5):774-785. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002676. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
6
Impulsivity and Fast-Food Consumption: A Cross-Sectional Study among Working Adults.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Jan;116(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
The influence of home food environments on eating behaviors of overweight and obese women.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 May-Jun;46(3):188-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.01.001.
9
Commitment devices: using initiatives to change behavior.
JAMA. 2014 May;311(20):2065-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3485.
10
The contribution of three components of nutrition knowledge to socio-economic differences in food purchasing choices.
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Aug;17(8):1814-24. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013002036. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验