• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Delay discounting and its association with food purchasing considerations and food availability in the home in south-east Alabama, USA.美国东南部阿拉巴马州的延迟折扣及其与食品购买考虑因素和家庭食品供应的关联。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Feb;22(2):287-294. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003142. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
2
Food choice motives mediate the relationship between delay discounting and binge eating: A structural equation modelling approach.食物选择动机介导了延迟折扣与暴饮暴食之间的关系:一种结构方程建模方法。
Appetite. 2025 Feb 1;206:107834. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107834. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
3
Qualitative Research on the Real-Time Decision Making of WIC Participants While Food Shopping: Use of Think-Aloud Methodology.关于 WIC 参与者在购物时实时决策的定性研究:使用出声思维法。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Jan;120(1):111-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
4
Delay discounting and household food purchasing decisions: The SHoPPER study.延迟折扣与家庭食物购买决策:SHoPPER 研究。
Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;38(4):334-342. doi: 10.1037/hea0000727.
5
Measuring the healthfulness of food retail stores: variations by store type and neighbourhood deprivation.衡量食品零售店的健康程度:因店铺类型和社区贫困程度而异
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 May 23;11:69. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-69.
6
' - Australian shoppers' experiences with online grocery platforms.- 澳大利亚消费者对在线食品杂货平台的体验。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 May 14;27(1):e134. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001046.
7
Gender and age are associated with healthy food purchases via grocery voucher redemption.性别和年龄与通过杂货店代金券兑换购买健康食品有关。
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(3):2830. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
8
Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study of Factors Associated with the Healthfulness of Parental Responses to Child Food Purchasing Requests.关于父母对儿童购买食品请求的健康回应相关因素的探索性横断面研究
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Aug;20(8):1569-77. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-1956-6.
9
Attitude and Behavior Factors Associated with Front-of-Package Label Use with Label Users Making Accurate Product Nutrition Assessments.与标签使用者准确评估产品营养状况相关的与态度和行为因素有关的包装正面标签使用。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 May;118(5):904-912. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
10
Impulsivity and Fast-Food Consumption: A Cross-Sectional Study among Working Adults.冲动性与快餐消费:一项在职成年人的横断面研究
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Jan;116(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting treatment adherence among patients with hypertension based on the PRECEDE model: A cross-sectional study from a delay discounting perspective.基于PRECEDE模型的高血压患者治疗依从性影响因素:一项从延迟折扣角度进行的横断面研究
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jan-Mar;25(1):100553. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100553. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
2
Tunneling, cognitive load and time orientation and their relations with dietary behavior of people experiencing financial scarcity - an AI-assisted scoping review elaborating on scarcity theory.经济拮据人群的隧道视觉、认知负荷和时间取向及其与饮食行为的关系——一项基于匮乏理论的人工智能辅助范围综述
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Mar 4;21(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01576-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Nutrition Facts Panels: Who Uses Them, What Do They Use, and How Does Use Relate to Dietary Intake?营养成分表:谁在使用它们,他们用它们来做什么,以及使用情况与饮食摄入有何关系?
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Feb;118(2):217-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.014.
2
Do nutrition labels influence healthier food choices? Analysis of label viewing behaviour and subsequent food purchases in a labelling intervention trial.营养标签是否会影响更健康的食物选择?一项标签干预试验中对标签查看行为及随后购买食品的分析。
Appetite. 2018 Feb 1;121:360-365. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.105. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
3
Impact of explained v. unexplained front-of-package nutrition labels on parent and child food choices: a randomized trial.已解释的与未解释的包装正面营养标签对家长和儿童食品选择的影响:一项随机试验。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Apr;20(5):774-785. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002676. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Employer Matching of Employees' Monetary Contributions to Deposit Contracts to Promote Weight Loss.雇主将员工的货币捐款与存款合同相匹配以促进减肥的随机对照试验。
Am J Health Promot. 2016 Jul;30(6):441-52. doi: 10.1177/0890117116658210.
5
The connecting health and technology study: a 6-month randomized controlled trial to improve nutrition behaviours using a mobile food record and text messaging support in young adults.连接健康与技术研究:一项为期6个月的随机对照试验,旨在通过移动食物记录和短信支持改善年轻人的营养行为。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Apr 21;13:52. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0376-8.
6
Impulsivity and Fast-Food Consumption: A Cross-Sectional Study among Working Adults.冲动性与快餐消费:一项在职成年人的横断面研究
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Jan;116(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
7
DietBet: A Web-Based Program that Uses Social Gaming and Financial Incentives to Promote Weight Loss.饮食打赌:一个利用社交游戏和财务激励来促进减肥的基于网络的程序。
JMIR Serious Games. 2014 Feb 7;2(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/games.2987.
8
The influence of home food environments on eating behaviors of overweight and obese women.家庭饮食环境对超重及肥胖女性饮食行为的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 May-Jun;46(3):188-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.01.001.
9
Commitment devices: using initiatives to change behavior.承诺机制:运用主动措施改变行为。
JAMA. 2014 May;311(20):2065-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3485.
10
The contribution of three components of nutrition knowledge to socio-economic differences in food purchasing choices.营养知识的三个组成部分对食品购买选择方面社会经济差异的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Aug;17(8):1814-24. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013002036. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

美国东南部阿拉巴马州的延迟折扣及其与食品购买考虑因素和家庭食品供应的关联。

Delay discounting and its association with food purchasing considerations and food availability in the home in south-east Alabama, USA.

机构信息

Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, 033 James E. Foy Hall, Auburn, AL36849, USA.

Auburn University College of Human Sciences, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Auburn, AL, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2019 Feb;22(2):287-294. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003142. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980018003142
PMID:30484416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10260547/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Certain factors, such as food quality, label content and grocery characteristics, may be considered when purchasing foods. Food availability in the home has been shown to influence dietary behaviours, also associated with delay discounting (DD). The present study sought to characterize the relationships between DD, food purchasing considerations and healthfulness of foods in the home.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional, online survey of adults (n 477) was conducted with the following measures: DD, consideration of food quality (nutrition, taste) and grocery characteristics (price, ease of preparation, shelf-life) while shopping, use of food labels and food availability in the home. DD was assessed by the area under the delay discounting curve (AUC) using a binary choice task. Greater AUC reflects lower DD. Structural equation modelling was used to allow AUC to simultaneously predict purchasing considerations and foods in the home.

SETTING

Online survey.ParticipantsAdult employees in south-east Alabama, USA.

RESULTS

DD was negatively associated with food label use and emphasis on food quality when shopping (P<0·001). In the final model, DD was associated with availability of healthful foods in the home and emphasis on food quality and grocery characteristics. About 33 % of the variance in shopping behaviours, 5 % in food label use, 7 % in availability of healthful foods and 4 % in availability of unhealthful foods was explained by DD.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with lower DD appear to be more thoughtful in making food purchasing decisions and have healthful foods available in the home more frequently than individuals with higher DD.

摘要

目的

在购买食品时,可能会考虑食品质量、标签内容和杂货店特征等因素。家庭中食物的可得性已被证明会影响饮食行为,这也与延迟折扣(DD)有关。本研究旨在描述 DD、购买食品时的考虑因素以及家庭中食品的健康程度之间的关系。

设计

对美国东南部的成年人(n 477)进行了横断面、在线调查,采用以下措施:DD、购物时对食品质量(营养、口味)和杂货店特征(价格、准备难易度、保质期)的考虑、食品标签的使用以及家庭中食品的可得性。DD 使用二元选择任务通过延迟折扣曲线下的面积(AUC)来评估。较大的 AUC 反映了较低的 DD。结构方程模型用于允许 AUC 同时预测购买考虑因素和家庭中的食品。

地点

在线调查。参与者:美国阿拉巴马州东南部的成年员工。

结果

DD 与购物时使用食品标签和强调食品质量呈负相关(P<0·001)。在最终模型中,DD 与家庭中健康食品的可得性以及对食品质量和杂货店特征的重视有关。购物行为的 33%、食品标签使用的 5%、健康食品的 7%和不健康食品的 4%的方差可由 DD 来解释。

结论

DD 较低的个体在做出购买食品的决策时似乎更有想法,并且家庭中更经常有健康的食品。