Black Christina, Ntani Georgia, Inskip Hazel, Cooper Cyrus, Cummins Steven, Moon Graham, Baird Janis
Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 May 23;11:69. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-69.
The consumer nutrition environment has been conceptualised as in-store environmental factors that influence food shopping habits. More healthful in-store environments could be characterised as those which promote healthful food choices such as selling good quality healthy foods or placing them in prominent locations to prompt purchasing. Research measuring the full-range of in-store environmental factors concurrently is limited.
To develop a summary score of 'healthfulness' composed of nine in-store factors that influence food shopping behaviour, and to assess this score by store type and neighbourhood deprivation.
A cross-sectional survey of 601 retail food stores, including supermarkets, grocery stores and convenience stores, was completed in Hampshire, United Kingdom between July 2010 and June 2011. The survey measured nine variables (variety, price, quality, promotions, shelf placement, store placement, nutrition information, healthier alternatives and single fruit sale) to assess the healthfulness of retail food stores on seven healthy and five less healthy foods that are markers of diet quality. Four steps were completed to create nine individual variable scores and another three to create an overall score of healthfulness for each store.
Analysis of variance showed strong evidence of a difference in overall healthfulness by store type (p < 0.001). Large and premium supermarkets offered the most healthful shopping environments for consumers. Discount supermarkets, 'world', convenience and petrol stores offered less healthful environments to consumers however there was variation across the healthfulness spectrum. No relationship between overall healthfulness and neighbourhood deprivation was observed (p = 0.1).
A new composite measure of nine variables that can influence food choices was developed to provide an overall assessment of the healthfulness of retail food stores. This composite score could be useful in future research to measure the relationship between main food store and quality of diet, and to evaluate the effects of multi-component food environment interventions.
消费者营养环境已被概念化为影响食品购物习惯的店内环境因素。更健康的店内环境可被描述为那些促进健康食品选择的环境,例如销售优质健康食品或将它们放置在显眼位置以促使购买。同时测量店内环境因素全范围的研究有限。
制定一个由九个影响食品购物行为的店内因素组成的“健康度”综合评分,并按商店类型和邻里贫困程度评估该评分。
2010年7月至2011年6月期间,在英国汉普郡完成了对601家零售食品店(包括超市、杂货店和便利店)的横断面调查。该调查测量了九个变量(种类、价格、质量、促销、货架摆放、店铺位置、营养信息、更健康的替代品和单份水果销售),以评估零售食品店对七种作为饮食质量标志的健康食品和五种不太健康食品的健康程度。完成了四个步骤来创建九个单独的变量评分,另外三个步骤为每家商店创建一个整体健康度评分。
方差分析显示有强有力的证据表明不同商店类型的整体健康度存在差异(p < 0.001)。大型和高级超市为消费者提供了最健康的购物环境。折扣超市、“世界”商店、便利店和加油站为消费者提供的环境不太健康,不过在健康程度范围内存在差异。未观察到整体健康度与邻里贫困之间的关系(p = 0.1)。
开发了一种新的由九个可影响食品选择的变量组成的综合测量方法,以全面评估零售食品店的健康程度。这个综合评分在未来研究中可能有助于测量主要食品店与饮食质量之间的关系,并评估多成分食品环境干预措施的效果。