• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与标准治疗相比用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的估计 5 年治疗需要人数,以预防心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院:来自 PARADIGM-HF 试验的数据分析。

Estimated 5-Year Number Needed to Treat to Prevent Cardiovascular Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization With Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition vs Standard Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of Data From the PARADIGM-HF Trial.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;3(12):1226-1231. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3957.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3957
PMID:30484837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6583093/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The addition of receptor-neprilysin inhibition to standard therapy, including a renin-angiotensin system blocker, has been demonstrated to improve outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared with standard therapy alone. The long-term absolute risk reduction from angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy, and whether it merits widespread use among diverse subpopulations, has not been well described.

OBJECTIVE

To calculate estimated 5-year number needed to treat (NNT) values overall and for different subpopulations for the Prospective Comparison of ARNI with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) cohort.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Overall and subpopulation 5-year NNT values were estimated for different end points using data from PARADIGM-HF, a double-blind, randomized trial of sacubitril-valsartan vs enalapril. This multicenter, international study included 8399 men and women with HFrEF (ejection fraction, ≤40%). The study began in December 2009 and ended in March 2014. Analyses began in March 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Random assignment to sacubitril-valsartan or enalapril.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The final cohort of 8399 individuals included 1832 women (21.8%) and 5544 white individuals (66.0%), with a mean (SD) age of 63.8 (11.4) years. The 5-year estimated NNT for the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization with ARNI therapy incremental to ACEI therapy in the overall cohort was 14. The 5-year estimated NNT values were calculated for different clinically relevant subpopulations and ranged from 12 to 19. The 5-year estimated NNT for all-cause mortality in the overall cohort with ARNI incremental to ACEI was 21, with values ranging from 16 to 31 among different subgroups. Compared with imputed placebo, the 5-year estimated NNT for all-cause mortality with ARNI was 11. The 5-year estimated NNT values were also calculated for other HFrEF therapies compared with controls from landmark trials for all-cause mortality and were found to be 18 for ACEI, 24 for angiotensin receptor blockers, 8 for β-blockers, 15 for mineralocorticoid antagonists, 14 for implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and 14 for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The 5-year estimated NNT with ARNI therapy incremental to ACEI therapy overall and for clinically relevant subpopulations of patients with HFrEF are comparable with those for well-established HF therapeutics. These data further support guideline recommendations for use of ARNI therapy among eligible patients with HFrEF.

摘要

重要性

与标准治疗(包括肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂)相比,添加受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNI)已被证明可改善射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的预后。ARNI 治疗的长期绝对风险降低,以及它是否值得在不同亚人群中广泛使用,尚未得到很好的描述。

目的

使用 Prospective Comparison of ARNI with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) 队列研究的数据,计算不同亚人群中总体和不同亚人群中不同终点的估计 5 年需要治疗人数(NNT)值。

设计、地点和参与者:使用来自 PARADIGM-HF 的数据,通过双盲、随机试验比较 sacubitril-valsartan 与依那普利,估计了不同结局的总体和亚人群的 5 年 NNT 值。这项多中心、国际研究纳入了 8399 名 HFrEF(射血分数,≤40%)男性和女性。该研究于 2009 年 12 月开始,2014 年 3 月结束。分析于 2018 年 3 月开始。

干预措施

随机分配接受 sacubitril-valsartan 或依那普利治疗。

主要结局和测量指标

心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院、心血管死亡和全因死亡率。

结果

最终的 8399 名个体队列包括 1832 名女性(21.8%)和 5544 名白人(66.0%),平均(SD)年龄为 63.8(11.4)岁。在整个队列中,与 ACEI 治疗相比,ARNI 治疗增加的主要终点为心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院的 5 年估计 NNT 值为 14。还为不同的临床相关亚人群计算了 5 年估计 NNT 值,范围为 12 至 19。在整个队列中,与 ACEI 相比,ARNI 增加的全因死亡率的 5 年估计 NNT 值为 21,不同亚组的范围为 16 至 31。与推断的安慰剂相比,ARNI 全因死亡率的 5 年估计 NNT 值为 11。还为来自全因死亡率的标志性试验的其他 HFrEF 治疗方法与对照进行了 5 年估计 NNT 值计算,发现 ACEI 为 18,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂为 24,β受体阻滞剂为 8,盐皮质激素拮抗剂为 15,植入式心脏复律除颤器为 14,心脏再同步治疗为 14。

结论和相关性

与标准治疗(包括肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂)相比,添加受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNI)治疗可改善射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的预后。与已确立的心力衰竭治疗方法相比,在整个 HFrEF 患者亚人群中,使用 ARNI 治疗的 5 年估计 NNT 值相当。这些数据进一步支持指南建议在有资格的 HFrEF 患者中使用 ARNI 治疗。

相似文献

1
Estimated 5-Year Number Needed to Treat to Prevent Cardiovascular Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization With Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition vs Standard Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of Data From the PARADIGM-HF Trial.血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与标准治疗相比用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的估计 5 年治疗需要人数,以预防心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院:来自 PARADIGM-HF 试验的数据分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;3(12):1226-1231. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3957.
2
Influence of Ejection Fraction on Outcomes and Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) Trial.射血分数对沙库巴曲缬沙坦(LCZ696)治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的疗效及预后的影响:ARNI与ACEI对心力衰竭全球死亡率和发病率影响的前瞻性比较(PARADIGM-HF)试验
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;9(3):e002744. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002744.
3
Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan in the PARADIGM-HF Trial (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) According to Background Therapy.在PARADIGM-HF试验(ARNI与ACEI前瞻性比较以确定对心力衰竭全球死亡率和发病率的影响)中,根据背景治疗情况,沙库巴曲缬沙坦的疗效。
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003212.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan Combination Therapy Compared With Enalapril for the Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠联合治疗与依那普利治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的成本效果比较。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 May;4(5):392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
5
Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition as a Paradigm for All?血管紧张素-中性肽链内切酶抑制作用能否成为通用范例?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Nov;18(11):115. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0784-z.
6
Angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor-a breakthrough in chronic heart failure therapy: summary of subanalysis on PARADIGM-HF trial findings.血管紧张素受体/脑啡肽酶抑制剂——慢性心力衰竭治疗的突破:PARADIGM-HF 试验结果的亚组分析总结。
Heart Fail Rev. 2020 May;25(3):393-402. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09879-x.
7
Dual angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibition as an alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: rationale for and design of the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM-HF).在慢性收缩性心力衰竭患者中,双重血管紧张素受体和脑啡肽酶抑制与血管紧张素转换酶抑制的比较:前瞻性比较 ARNI 与 ACEI 对心力衰竭患者全球死亡率和发病率影响的研究(PARADIGM-HF)的原理和设计。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Sep;15(9):1062-73. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft052. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
8
Outcomes and Effect of Treatment According to Etiology in HFrEF: An Analysis of PARADIGM-HF.射血分数降低心衰(HFrEF)患者按病因的治疗结局和效果:PARADIGM-HF 分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;7(6):457-465. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 May 8.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Switching Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction to Sacubitril/Valsartan: The Australian Perspective.将射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者转换为沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的成本效益:澳大利亚视角
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Sep;29(9):1310-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
10
Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan Relative to a Prior Decompensation: The PARADIGM-HF Trial.沙库巴曲缬沙坦相对于先前失代偿的疗效:PARADIGM-HF 试验。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Oct;4(10):816-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Long term event-free survival following cell-based therapy in patients with cardiomyopathy: the HYPERION observational cohort.心肌病患者接受细胞治疗后的长期无事件生存率:HYPERION观察性队列研究
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2025 May 19;14(5). doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szaf010.
2
Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor Prescribing Patterns in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure.因心力衰竭住院患者中血管紧张素受体-中性肽链内切酶抑制剂的处方模式
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Mar 1;10(3):276-283. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3815.
3
Vericiguat Global Study in Participants with Chronic Heart Failure: Design of the VICTOR trial.慢性心力衰竭患者的维立西呱全球研究:VICTOR试验设计
Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;27(2):209-218. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3501. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
4
Unraveling Chronic Cardiovascular and Kidney Disorder through the Butterfly Effect.通过蝴蝶效应揭示慢性心血管和肾脏疾病
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 20;14(5):463. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14050463.
5
Prognosis of CRT-treated and CRT-untreated unselected population with LBBB in Stockholm County.在斯德哥尔摩县,未选择 CRT 治疗和 CRT 未治疗的 LBBB 患者的预后。
Europace. 2023 Jul 4;25(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad192.
6
Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure compared to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.与肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Med Sci. 2023 May 14;19(3):565-576. doi: 10.5114/aoms/159113. eCollection 2023.
7
Transcatheter mitral and tricuspid interventions-the bigger picture: valvular disease as part of heart failure.经导管二尖瓣和三尖瓣介入治疗——宏观视角:瓣膜疾病作为心力衰竭的一部分
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 15;10:1091309. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1091309. eCollection 2023.
8
The grand challenge of discovering new cardiovascular drugs.发现新型心血管药物的巨大挑战。
Front Drug Discov (Lausanne). 2022;2. doi: 10.3389/fddsv.2022.1027401. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
9
A New Perspective on the Renin-Angiotensin System.肾素-血管紧张素系统的新视角
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;13(1):16. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010016.
10
Pathophysiology and Management of Heart Failure in the Elderly.老年人心力衰竭的病理生理学与管理
Int J Angiol. 2022 Nov 11;31(4):251-259. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758357. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Physical and Social Activity Limitations in Patients With Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial.沙库巴曲缬沙坦对心力衰竭患者身体活动和社会活动受限的影响:PARADIGM-HF 试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jun 1;3(6):498-505. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0398.
2
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Enalapril in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦与依那普利治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的成本效果分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;1(6):666-72. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1747.
3
Potential Mortality Reduction With Optimal Implementation of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor Therapy in Heart Failure.血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂治疗心力衰竭的最佳实施可降低潜在死亡率。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;1(6):714-7. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1724.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan Combination Therapy Compared With Enalapril for the Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠联合治疗与依那普利治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的成本效果比较。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 May;4(5):392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
5
Estimating the Long-Term Treatment Benefits of Sacubitril-Valsartan.沙库巴曲缬沙坦的长期治疗获益评估
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2289-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1509753.
6
A putative placebo analysis of the effects of LCZ696 on clinical outcomes in heart failure.关于LCZ696对心力衰竭临床结局影响的一项假定安慰剂分析。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Feb 14;36(7):434-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu455.
7
Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure.血管紧张素-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与依那普利治疗心力衰竭的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
8
Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for mild-to-moderate heart failure.心脏再同步治疗轻中度心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 16;363(25):2385-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009540. Epub 2010 Nov 14.
9
Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms.依普利酮治疗有收缩性心力衰竭和轻度症状的患者。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 6;364(1):11-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009492. Epub 2010 Nov 14.
10
Number needed to treat with rosuvastatin to prevent first cardiovascular events and death among men and women with low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: justification for the use of statins in prevention: an intervention trial evaluating rosuvastatin (JUPITER).在低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平低且高敏C反应蛋白升高的男性和女性中,使用瑞舒伐他汀预防首次心血管事件和死亡的需治疗人数:他汀类药物用于预防的依据:一项评估瑞舒伐他汀的干预试验(JUPITER)
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):616-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.848473. Epub 2009 Sep 22.