• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因心力衰竭住院患者中血管紧张素受体-中性肽链内切酶抑制剂的处方模式

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor Prescribing Patterns in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure.

作者信息

Srivastava Pratyaksh K, Klomhaus Alexandra M, Greene Stephen J, Heidenreich Paul, Lewsey Sabra C, Yancy Clyde W, Fonarow Gregg C

机构信息

Ahmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Department of Medicine, Statistics Core, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Mar 1;10(3):276-283. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3815.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3815
PMID:39661383
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11904728/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition (ARNI) improves mortality among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), ie, those with an EF of 40% or less.

OBJECTIVE

To describe national longitudinal trends in ARNI prescribing patterns among hospitalized patients with HFrEF.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using data from the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) registry, hospitalized patients with HFrEF at 614 participating hospitals were identified. Rates of ARNI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) prescription at discharge were evaluated across 3 time periods. Adjusted logistic regression and piecewise logistic regression were used to evaluate the impact of publication dates on ARNI prescription rates.

EXPOSURES

ARNI prescribing patterns in hospitalized patients with HFrEF.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Rates of ARNI, ACEI, and ARB prescription at discharge were evaluated across 3 time periods as follows: (1) period 1 included the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of sacubitril-valsartan to the day before the PIONEER-HF (Comparison of Sacubitril-Valsartan vs Enalapril on Effect on N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Patients Stabilized From an Acute Heart Failure Episode) trial publication (July 7, 2015-November 10, 2018); (2) period 2 included the day of the PIONEER-HF trial publication to the day before publication of the 2021 Update to the 2017 Consensus for Optimization of Heart Failure Treatment (November 11, 2018-January 10, 2021); and (3) period 3 included the day of the 2021 update publication to the last available data at the time of analysis (January 11, 2021-December 31, 2022).

RESULTS

A total of 114 333 hospitalized patients (mean [IQR] age, 67.0 [57.0-78.0] years; 74 765 male [65.4%]) were included in this study. Rates of ARNI prescribed at discharge increased from 1.1% (27 of 2451) during July 7, 2015, to September 30, 2015, to 55.4% (1957 of 3536) during October 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. ACEI or ARB prescription at discharge fell from 88.3% (2612 of 2957) to 45.9% (2033 of 4434) over the same period, whereas ACEI, ARB, or ARNI prescription increased from 71.1% (2639 of 3713) to 84.7% (3990 of 4711). In adjusted logistic regression models, compared with period 1, patients discharged during period 2 and period 3 were found to have a 3.81-fold (95% CI, 3.65-3.98) and 9.15-fold (95% CI, 8.79-9.52) increased odds of ARNI prescription at discharge, and a 0.46 (95% CI, 0.45-0.48) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.24-0.26) decreased odds of ACEI or ARB prescription at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this cross-sectional study reveal that in the 7 years after FDA drug approval of sacubitril-valsartan, rates of ARNI or ACEI, ARB, or ARNI prescription at discharge increased, and rates of ACEI or ARB prescription decreased. Overall prescription of ARNI at discharge was 55.4% in eligible patients at the end of the study, suggesting remaining opportunity for continued improvement in ARNI prescription.

摘要

重要性

血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNI)可降低射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者(即射血分数为40%或更低的患者)的死亡率。

目的

描述住院HFrEF患者中ARNI处方模式的全国纵向趋势。

设计、设置和参与者:利用“遵循心力衰竭治疗指南”(GWTG-HF)注册研究的数据,确定了614家参与医院的住院HFrEF患者。评估了3个时间段出院时ARNI、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)的处方率。采用调整后的逻辑回归和分段逻辑回归来评估发表日期对ARNI处方率的影响。

暴露因素

住院HFrEF患者的ARNI处方模式。

主要结局和衡量指标

在3个时间段评估出院时ARNI、ACEI和ARB的处方率如下:(1)第1阶段包括美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准沙库巴曲缬沙坦至“先锋-HF”(沙库巴曲缬沙坦与依那普利对急性心力衰竭发作稳定患者N末端脑钠肽前体影响的比较)试验发表前一天(2015年7月7日至2018年11月10日);(2)第2阶段包括“先锋-HF”试验发表当天至《2017年心力衰竭治疗优化共识2021年更新》发表前一天(2018年11月11日至2021年1月10日);(3)第3阶段包括2021年更新发表当天至分析时的最后可用数据(2021年1月11日至2022年12月31日)。

结果

本研究共纳入114333例住院患者(平均[四分位间距]年龄为67.0[57.0 - 78.0]岁;74765例男性[65.4%])。出院时ARNI的处方率从2015年7月7日至2015年9月30日的1.1%(2451例中的27例)增至2022年10月1日至2022年12月31日的55.4%(3536例中的1957例)。同期出院时ACEI或ARB的处方率从88.3%(2957例中的2612例)降至45.9%(4434例中的2033例),而ACEI、ARB或ARNI的处方率从71.1%(3713例中的2639例)增至84.7%(4711例中的3990例)。在调整后的逻辑回归模型中,与第1阶段相比,第2阶段和第3阶段出院的患者出院时ARNI处方的优势比分别增加3.81倍(95%置信区间,3.65 - 3.98)和9.15倍(95%置信区间,8.79 - 9.52),ACEI或ARB处方的优势比分别降低0.46(95%置信区间,0.45 - 0.48)和0.25(95%置信区间,0.24 - 0.26)。

结论与意义

这项横断面研究的结果显示,在FDA批准沙库巴曲缬沙坦后的7年里,出院时ARNI或ACEI、ARB或ARNI的处方率增加,而ACEI或ARB的处方率降低。在研究结束时,符合条件的患者出院时ARNI的总体处方率为55.4%,这表明ARNI处方仍有持续改善的空间。

相似文献

1
Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor Prescribing Patterns in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure.因心力衰竭住院患者中血管紧张素受体-中性肽链内切酶抑制剂的处方模式
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Mar 1;10(3):276-283. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3815.
2
Early Adoption of Sacubitril/Valsartan for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF).沙库巴曲缬沙坦在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中的早期应用:来自“遵循指南-心力衰竭(GWTG-HF)”的见解。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Apr;5(4):305-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.12.018.
3
Estimated 5-Year Number Needed to Treat to Prevent Cardiovascular Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization With Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition vs Standard Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of Data From the PARADIGM-HF Trial.血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与标准治疗相比用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的估计 5 年治疗需要人数,以预防心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院:来自 PARADIGM-HF 试验的数据分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;3(12):1226-1231. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3957.
4
Effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors on left atrial remodeling and prognosis in heart failure.血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂对心力衰竭患者左心房重构及预后的影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;9(1):667-675. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13691. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
5
Clinical Effectiveness of Sacubitril/Valsartan Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠片治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的临床疗效。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 17;10(16):e021459. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021459. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
6
Influence of Ejection Fraction on Outcomes and Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) Trial.射血分数对沙库巴曲缬沙坦(LCZ696)治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的疗效及预后的影响:ARNI与ACEI对心力衰竭全球死亡率和发病率影响的前瞻性比较(PARADIGM-HF)试验
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;9(3):e002744. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002744.
7
Relationship Between Hospital Characteristics and Early Adoption of Angiotensin-Receptor/Neprilysin Inhibitor Among Eligible Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure.医院特征与心力衰竭住院患者中血管紧张素受体/脑啡肽酶抑制剂早期应用的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 5;8(3):e010484. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010484.
8
Combined Angiotensin Receptor Antagonism and Neprilysin Inhibition.血管紧张素受体拮抗剂与中性内肽酶抑制剂联合使用
Circulation. 2016 Mar 15;133(11):1115-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018622.
9
Kidney Outcomes Following Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Therapy for Thrombotic Microangiopathy.血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗血栓性微血管病的肾脏结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432862. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32862.
10
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction Combined With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Kidney Disease.沙库巴曲缬沙坦与血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体拮抗剂在射血分数降低合并中重度慢性肾脏病患者中的疗效和安全性比较。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jan-Dec;29:10742484241265337. doi: 10.1177/10742484241265337. Epub 2024 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure: Twenty Years in Review, Lessons Learned, and the Road Ahead.《遵循心力衰竭治疗指南:二十年回顾、经验教训与未来之路》
Circ Heart Fail. 2025 May 12:e012936. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.125.012936.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart failure quality of care and in-hospital outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry.COVID-19 大流行期间心力衰竭的护理质量和院内结局:来自 Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure 注册研究的结果。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;24(6):1117-1128. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2484. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of new medicines into clinical practice: a systematic review.新药品在临床实践中的采用的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 5;21(1):1198. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07196-4.
3
Cost-effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Hospitalized Patients Who Have Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭住院患者的成本效果分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Nov 1;5(11):1236-1244. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2822.
4
Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.血管紧张素-中性肽链内切酶抑制在急性失代偿性心力衰竭中的作用
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 14;380(11):1090. doi: 10.1056/NEJMx190009. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
5
Estimated 5-Year Number Needed to Treat to Prevent Cardiovascular Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization With Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition vs Standard Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of Data From the PARADIGM-HF Trial.血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与标准治疗相比用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的估计 5 年治疗需要人数,以预防心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院:来自 PARADIGM-HF 试验的数据分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;3(12):1226-1231. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3957.
6
Early Adoption of Sacubitril/Valsartan for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF).沙库巴曲缬沙坦在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中的早期应用:来自“遵循指南-心力衰竭(GWTG-HF)”的见解。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Apr;5(4):305-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.12.018.
7
Risk-treatment mismatch in the pharmacotherapy of heart failure.心力衰竭药物治疗中的风险-治疗不匹配
JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1240-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1240.
8
Why do patients fail to receive beta-blockers for chronic heart failure over time? A "real-world" single-center, 2-year follow-up experience of beta-blocker therapy in patients with chronic heart failure.为何随着时间推移,慢性心力衰竭患者无法接受β受体阻滞剂治疗?一项针对慢性心力衰竭患者β受体阻滞剂治疗的“真实世界”单中心2年随访经验。
Am Heart J. 2005 May;149(5):921-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.07.026.