• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在斯德哥尔摩县,未选择 CRT 治疗和 CRT 未治疗的 LBBB 患者的预后。

Prognosis of CRT-treated and CRT-untreated unselected population with LBBB in Stockholm County.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Norrbacka S1:02, Eugeniavägen 27-31, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Europace. 2023 Jul 4;25(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad192.

DOI:10.1093/europace/euad192
PMID:37403689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10365846/
Abstract

AIMS

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) might be the first finding of cardiovascular diseases but also the prerequisite for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The prognosis for patients with LBBB and the implications of CRT in an unselected real-world setting are the focus of our study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A central electrocardiogram (ECG) database and national registers have been screened to identify patients with LBBB. Predictors of HF and the use of CRT were identified with Cox models. The hazard ratios (HRs) of death, cardiovascular death (CVD), and HF hospitalization (HFH) were estimated according to CRT use. Of 5359 patients with LBBB and QRS > 150 ms, median age 76 years, 36% were female. At the time of index ECG, 41% had a previous history of HF and 27% developed HF. Among 1053 patients with a class I indication for CRT, only 60% received CRT with a median delay of 137 days, and it was associated with a lower risk of death [HR: 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.57], CVD (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.35-0.63), and HFH (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.48-0.66). The age of over 75 years and the diagnosis of dementia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were predictors of CRT non-use, while having a pacing/defibrillator device independently predicted CRT use.

CONCLUSION

In an unselected LBBB population, CRT is underused but of great value for HF patients. Therefore, it is crucial to find ways of better implementing and understanding CRT utilization and characteristics that influence the management of our patients.

摘要

目的

左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)可能是心血管疾病的首发表现,也是射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的前提。本研究重点关注 LBBB 患者的预后以及 CRT 在未选择的真实世界环境中的应用意义。

方法和结果

筛选了中心心电图(ECG)数据库和国家登记处,以确定 LBBB 患者。使用 Cox 模型确定心力衰竭和 CRT 的预测因素。根据 CRT 的使用情况,估计死亡、心血管死亡(CVD)和心力衰竭住院(HFH)的风险比(HR)。在 5359 例 QRS>150ms 的 LBBB 患者中,中位年龄为 76 岁,36%为女性。在指数 ECG 时,41%的患者有心力衰竭病史,27%的患者发生心力衰竭。在 1053 例有 CRT Ⅰ类适应证的患者中,只有 60%接受了 CRT,中位延迟时间为 137 天,且死亡率降低[HR:0.45,95%置信区间(CI):0.36-0.57]、CVD(HR:0.47,95%CI:0.35-0.63)和 HFH(HR:0.56,95%CI:0.48-0.66)。年龄>75 岁、痴呆和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的诊断是 CRT 未使用的预测因素,而植入起搏器/除颤器则独立预测 CRT 的使用。

结论

在未选择的 LBBB 人群中,CRT 的使用不足,但对心力衰竭患者具有重要价值。因此,找到更好地实施和理解 CRT 应用以及影响患者管理的 CRT 使用特征的方法至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/e734735cc6a7/euad192f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/49b08f0f56df/euad192_ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/bb83ecf119d7/euad192f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/524043657cf2/euad192f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/80deab1cf2fa/euad192f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/f95ef7bb74f0/euad192f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/e734735cc6a7/euad192f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/49b08f0f56df/euad192_ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/bb83ecf119d7/euad192f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/524043657cf2/euad192f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/80deab1cf2fa/euad192f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/f95ef7bb74f0/euad192f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd4/10365846/e734735cc6a7/euad192f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognosis of CRT-treated and CRT-untreated unselected population with LBBB in Stockholm County.在斯德哥尔摩县,未选择 CRT 治疗和 CRT 未治疗的 LBBB 患者的预后。
Europace. 2023 Jul 4;25(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad192.
2
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Improves Outcomes in Patients With Intraventricular Conduction Delay But Not Right Bundle Branch Block: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.心脏再同步治疗改善伴有室内传导延迟但无右束支传导阻滞患者的结局:一项随机对照试验的患者水平荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2023 Mar 7;147(10):812-823. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062124. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
3
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Risk of Recurrent Hospitalizations in Patients Without Left Bundle Branch Block: The Long-Term Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.心脏再同步治疗与无左束支阻滞患者再住院风险:长期多中心自动除颤器植入试验与心脏再同步治疗。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Jul;13(7):e006925. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.006925. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
4
Sustained clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-LBBB patients with prolonged PR-interval: MADIT-CRT long-term follow-up.心脏再同步治疗对PR间期延长的非左束支传导阻滞患者的持续临床获益:MADIT-CRT长期随访
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Nov;105(11):944-952. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1003-z. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
5
Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).多中心自动除颤器植入试验-心脏再同步治疗(MADIT-CRT)中 QRS 形态对心脏再同步治疗效果的影响。
Circulation. 2011 Mar 15;123(10):1061-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.960898. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
6
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women versus men: observational comparative effectiveness study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.女性与男性的心脏再同步治疗:来自国家心血管数据登记处的观察性比较疗效研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2 Suppl 1):S4-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001548. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
7
Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.心脏再同步治疗植入时右向左心室激活延迟时间延长与左束支传导阻滞患者临床结局改善相关。
Europace. 2016 Apr;18(4):550-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv117. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
8
Usefulness of Electrocardiographic Left Atrial Abnormality to Predict Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Mild Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block (a Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Substudy).心电图左心房异常对轻度心力衰竭合并左束支传导阻滞患者心脏再同步治疗反应的预测价值(一项心脏再同步治疗亚组的多中心自动除颤器植入试验)
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 15;122(2):268-274. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.364. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
9
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women: US Food and Drug Administration meta-analysis of patient-level data.心脏再同步治疗在女性中的应用:美国食品和药物管理局患者水平数据的荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1340-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2717.
10
Temporal Influence of Heart Failure Hospitalizations Prior to Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Defibrillator on Subsequent Outcome in Mild Heart Failure Patients (from MADIT-CRT).在轻度心力衰竭患者中(来自MADIT-CRT研究),植入式心律转复除颤器或心脏再同步化治疗除颤器之前心力衰竭住院对后续结局的时间影响
Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 15;115(10):1423-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting Secondary Dilative Cardiomyopathy.再探继发性扩张型心肌病
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 28;26(9):4181. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094181.
2
Unexpected implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: Its characteristics and prognosis.心脏再同步治疗的意外植入:其特征与预后
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Sep 16;5(11):825-827. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.004. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Age-Stratified Clinical Outcome in Patients with Known Heart Failure Who Receive Pacemaker, Resynchronization Therapy, or Defibrillator Implants.

本文引用的文献

1
Timing of cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation.心脏再同步治疗的植入时机。
Europace. 2023 May 19;25(5). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad059.
2
Reduction in long-term mortality using remote device monitoring in a large real-world population of patients with implantable defibrillators.在植入式除颤器的大型真实世界患者群体中使用远程设备监测降低长期死亡率。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):969-977. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac280.
3
Prevalence and incidence of intraventricular conduction disturbances among Chinese adults: Results from the Kailuan study.
植入起搏器、心脏再同步治疗装置或除颤器的已知心力衰竭患者的年龄分层临床结局。
Cardiology. 2024;149(5):474-483. doi: 10.1159/000538529. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
中国成年人室内传导障碍的患病率和发病率:开滦研究结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 20;9:959781. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.959781. eCollection 2022.
4
Fifteen-Year Differences in Indications for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in International Guidelines-Insights from the Heart Failure Registries of the European Society of Cardiology.国际指南中心脏再同步治疗适应证的15年差异——来自欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭注册研究的见解
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 6;11(11):3236. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113236.
5
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-e421. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
6
Use of evidence-based therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction across age strata.基于证据的治疗在射血分数降低的心力衰竭各年龄段患者中的应用。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;24(6):1047-1062. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2483. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
7
Long-term quality of life and acceptance of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey.植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的长期生活质量及接受情况:欧洲心律协会调查结果
Europace. 2022 May 3;24(5):860-867. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac011.
8
Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology.心力衰竭的全球负担:流行病学的全面更新综述
Cardiovasc Res. 2023 Jan 18;118(17):3272-3287. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac013.
9
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator in patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者的心脏再同步治疗伴或不伴除颤器
Europace. 2022 Jan 4;24(1):48-57. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab233.
10
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.2021年欧洲心脏病学会心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南。
Europace. 2022 Jan 4;24(1):71-164. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab232.