Staub Blake N, Lafage Renaud, Kim Han Jo, Shaffrey Christopher I, Mundis Gregory M, Hostin Richard, Burton Douglas, Lenke Lawrence, Gupta Munish C, Ames Christopher, Klineberg Eric, Bess Shay, Schwab Frank, Lafage Virginie
Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Oct 5;30(1):31-37. doi: 10.3171/2018.5.SPINE171232. Print 2019 Jan 1.
Numerous studies have attempted to delineate the normative value for T1S-CL (T1 slope minus cervical lordosis) as a marker for both cervical deformity and a goal for correction similar to how PI-LL (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis) mismatch informs decision making in thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity (ASD). The goal of this study was to define the relationship between T1 slope (T1S) and cervical lordosis (CL). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospective database. Surgical ASD cases were initially analyzed. Analysis across the sagittal parameters was performed. Linear regression analysis based on T1S was used to provide a clinically applicable equation to predict CL. Findings were validated using the postoperative alignment of the ASD patients. Further validation was then performed using a second, normative database. The range of normal alignment associated with horizontal gaze was derived from a multilinear regression on data from asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients (mean age 54.7 years) were included. Analysis revealed a strong correlation between T1S and C0-7 lordosis (r = 0.886), C2-7 lordosis (r = 0.815), and C0-2 lordosis (r = 0.732). There was no significant correlation between T1S and T1S-CL. Linear regression analysis revealed that T1S-CL assumed a constant value of 16.5° (R2 = 0.664, standard error 2°). These findings were validated on the postoperative imaging (mean absolute error [MAE] 5.9°). The equation was then applied to the normative database (MAE 6.7° controlling for McGregor slope [MGS] between -5° and 15°). A multilinear regression between C2-7, T1S, and MGS demonstrated a range of T1S-CL between 14.5° and 26.5° was necessary to maintain horizontal gaze. CONCLUSIONS: Normative CL can be predicted via the formula CL = T1S - 16.5° ± 2°. This implies a threshold of deformity and aids in providing a goal for surgical correction. Just as pelvic incidence (PI) can be used to determine the ideal LL, T1S can be used to predict ideal CL. This formula also implies that a kyphotic cervical alignment is to be expected for individuals with a T1S < 16.5°.
众多研究试图明确T1S-CL(T1斜率减去颈椎前凸)的正常数值,将其作为颈椎畸形的一个指标以及矫正目标,类似于骨盆入射角-腰椎前凸(PI-LL)不匹配在成人胸腰椎脊柱畸形(ASD)决策中的作用。本研究的目的是确定T1斜率(T1S)与颈椎前凸(CL)之间的关系。方法:这是一项对前瞻性数据库的回顾性研究。最初分析手术ASD病例。对矢状面参数进行分析。基于T1S的线性回归分析用于提供一个临床适用的方程来预测CL。使用ASD患者的术后对线情况对结果进行验证。然后使用第二个正常数据库进行进一步验证。与水平凝视相关的正常对线范围来自对无症状患者数据的多元线性回归。结果:共纳入103例患者(平均年龄54.7岁)。分析显示T1S与C0-7前凸(r = 0.886)、C2-7前凸(r = 0.815)和C0-2前凸(r = 0.732)之间存在强相关性。T1S与T1S-CL之间无显著相关性。线性回归分析显示T1S-CL的恒定值为16.5°(R2 = 0.664,标准误差2°)。这些结果在术后影像学上得到验证(平均绝对误差[MAE] 5.9°)。然后将该方程应用于正常数据库(MAE 6.7°,控制麦格雷戈斜率[MGS]在-5°至15°之间)。C2-7、T1S和MGS之间的多元线性回归表明,维持水平凝视需要T1S-CL在14.5°至26.5°之间。结论:正常CL可通过公式CL = T1S - 16.5°±2°预测。这意味着畸形阈值,并有助于提供手术矫正目标。正如骨盆入射角(PI)可用于确定理想的腰椎前凸(LL)一样,T1S可用于预测理想的CL。该公式还意味着,对于T1S < 16.5°的个体,预期颈椎呈后凸对线。