Suppr超能文献

关于暴力袭击、枪支管制和枪支购买的在线兴趣:因果分析。

Online interest regarding violent attacks, gun control, and gun purchase: A causal analysis.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Health Informatics and Analytics Program, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States of America.

School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207924. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increased interest about gun ownership and gun control are oftentimes driven by informational shocks in a common factor, namely violent attacks, and the perceived need for higher levels of safety. A causal depiction of the societal interest around violent attacks, gun control and gun purchase, both synchronous and over time, should be a stepping stone for designing future strategies regarding the safety concerns of the U.S. population.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the causal relationships between unexpected increases in population interest about violent attacks, gun control, and gun purchase.

METHODS

Relationships among online searches for information about violent attacks, gun control, and gun purchase occurring between 2004 and 2017 in the U.S. are explained through a novel structural vector autoregressive time series model to account for simultaneous causal relationships.

RESULTS

More than 20% of the stationary variability in each of gun control and gun purchase interest can be explained by the remaining factors. Gun control interest appears to be caused, in part, by violent attacks informational shocks, yet violent attacks, although impactful, have a lesser effect than gun control debate on long-term gun ownership interests.

CONCLUSIONS

The form in which gun control has been introduced in public debate may have further increased gun ownership interest. Reactive gun purchase interest may be an unintended side effect of gun control debate. U.S. policymakers may need to rethink current approaches to promotion of gun control, and whether societal policy debate without policy outcomes could be having unintended effects.

摘要

背景

枪支拥有和枪支管制的兴趣增加通常是由共同因素引起的信息冲击驱动的,即暴力袭击,以及对更高安全水平的感知需求。对暴力袭击、枪支管制和枪支购买的社会利益进行同步和随时间变化的因果描述,应该是设计美国人口安全问题未来策略的垫脚石。

目的

检验人口对暴力袭击、枪支管制和枪支购买的兴趣突然增加之间的因果关系。

方法

通过一种新颖的结构向量自回归时间序列模型,解释了 2004 年至 2017 年期间美国发生的暴力袭击、枪支管制和枪支购买在线搜索信息之间的关系,以说明同时存在的因果关系。

结果

枪支管制和枪支购买兴趣的稳定变化的 20%以上可以用其余因素来解释。枪支管制兴趣似乎部分是由暴力袭击信息冲击引起的,但尽管暴力袭击具有影响力,但对长期枪支拥有兴趣的影响小于枪支管制辩论。

结论

枪支管制在公共辩论中引入的形式可能进一步增加了枪支拥有兴趣。对枪支的反应性购买兴趣可能是枪支管制辩论的一个意外副作用。美国政策制定者可能需要重新考虑当前促进枪支管制的方法,以及没有政策结果的社会政策辩论是否可能产生意想不到的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db27/6261600/b59415ea289d/pone.0207924.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Online interest regarding violent attacks, gun control, and gun purchase: A causal analysis.
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207924. eCollection 2018.
2
Gun-Related and Other Violent Crime After Involuntary Commitment and Short-Term Emergency Holds.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2020 Dec;48(4):454-467. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.200082-20. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
State Firearm Laws and Interstate Transfer of Guns in the USA, 2006-2016.
J Urban Health. 2018 Jun;95(3):322-336. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0251-9.
5
Legal status and source of offenders' firearms in states with the least stringent criteria for gun ownership.
Inj Prev. 2013 Feb;19(1):26-31. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040290. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
7
Is gun control really about people control?
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Oct 4;10:195. doi: 10.25259/SNI_480_2019. eCollection 2019.
8
Effects of policies designed to keep firearms from high-risk individuals.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:21-37. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122516. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
9
Rising Gun Sales in the Wake of Mass Shootings and Gun Legislation.
J Prim Prev. 2021 Feb;42(1):27-42. doi: 10.1007/s10935-021-00622-7. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Polarization and trust in the evolution of vaccine discourse on Twitter during COVID-19.
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 14;17(12):e0277292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277292. eCollection 2022.
2
Attention and counter-framing in the Black Lives Matter movement on Twitter.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):367. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01384-1. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
3
Internet search patterns reveal firearm sales, policies, and deaths.
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Nov 20;3(1):152. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00356-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Death by Gun Violence-A Public Health Crisis.
JAMA. 2017 Nov 14;318(18):1763-1764. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16446.
2
After the Mass Shooting in Las Vegas - Finding Common Ground on Gun Control.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 26;377(17):1679-1680. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1713203. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
3
The impact of the Orlando mass shooting on fear of victimization and gun-purchasing intentions: Not what one might expect.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 11;12(8):e0182408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182408. eCollection 2017.
4
Advances in using Internet searches to track dengue.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jul 20;13(7):e1005607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005607. eCollection 2017 Jul.
5
Funding and Publication of Research on Gun Violence and Other Leading Causes of Death.
JAMA. 2017 Jan 3;317(1):84-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16215.
6
Editorial Commentary: Perspectives on the Future of Internet Search Engines and Biosurveillance Systems.
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 1;64(1):42-43. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw660. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
8
9
Analysis of the Capacity of Google Trends to Measure Interest in Conservation Topics and the Role of Online News.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 30;11(3):e0152802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152802. eCollection 2016.
10
What Do We Know About the Association Between Firearm Legislation and Firearm-Related Injuries?
Epidemiol Rev. 2016;38(1):140-57. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxv012. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验